Party Poker's 48 hour Cash Game comes to Dusk Till Dawn

[GreekStein]

There's too many players who are trying to prove they are stars by playing laggy in these games when the right way is to play tight really imo. Its not as good to watch but gets the job done.

Roberto's river call there is horrid. What can he beat?

[George2Loose]

There's too many players who are trying to prove they are stars by playing laggy in these games when the right way is to play tight really imo. Its not as good to watch but gets the job done.

Roberto's river call there is horrid. What can he beat?

The voting aspect makes this shitty tho cos if u play too solid u just get removed

[TightEnd]

Indeed.exactly that happened to fitoussi.

[smashedagain]

There's too many players who are trying to prove they are stars by playing laggy in these games when the right way is to play tight really imo. Its not as good to watch but gets the job done.

Roberto's river call there is horrid. What can he beat?

The voting aspect makes this shitty tho cos if u play too solid u just get removed

as happened to neil...only 500 votes cast 38% wanted him to go 28 annette

[Woodsey]

There's too many players who are trying to prove they are stars by playing laggy in these games when the right way is to play tight really imo. Its not as good to watch but gets the job done.

Roberto's river call there is horrid. What can he beat?

I was joking obv, I would have been a nit too. Most of the lagtard kids lost anyway  

[Cf]

There was one interesting bit where I think Romanello (or however you spell it) complained about someone 3/4/whevertheywereupto-betting pre. He moaned it didn't let them see flops. I actually agree with it to an extent. Hands where it went raise-call-call-call-raise-fold-fold-fold are boring to watch. Multi-way pots where everyone hits is much more fun.

Basically to me in this format I like to watch the loose-passive sort of players who are quite loud over the technically much better young guy who just sits there quietly playing good poker. I'm watching it for a bit of entertainment, not for a poker lesson.

So as far as the voting goes... yeah, get rid of the tight/aggressive players. Can't for the life of me understand why Viffer got voted off though.

[pleno1]

There was one interesting bit where I think Romanello (or however you spell it) complained about someone 3/4/whevertheywereupto-betting pre. He moaned it didn't let them see flops. I actually agree with it to an extent. Hands where it went raise-call-call-call-raise-fold-fold-fold are boring to watch. Multi-way pots where everyone hits is much more fun.

how'd that go for him?