Help required to settle an argument I was having with a friend the other night. We were discussing the situations in which the players decide to 'run it twice'. I have never played in a game were this has happened so i was assuming the order of events regarding the burn cards. Lets say we have 2 players all in pre with

vs

, standard sequence of events is burn,flop,burn,turn,burn,river.....my argument was that the 2nd board would be dealt exactly the same, however he insists that there are no burns and the 5 cards are dealt straight off the top......someone please clarify.im pretty sure im right but its one of those were he sounded so sure i was doubting myself.apologies for wishy washy description