think 80 is too big as we are never gonna be raise/folding that amount so something like 55/65 is better IMO as people can peel wider/jam wider IMO.
given reads too its hard to see him stacking off pre there even with KK so I think the more we make it the harder it is for us to get in stacks. fwiw id rather flat than make it 80 even if we are so deep...also for the reason that given reads he ain't gonna be 3betting light with stuff like 9Ts or 77 etc its always gonna be broadway cards or TT thru to KK.
awooga sir username?
Can understand the thoughts re: making it 55/60, but I made it so large because the table was full of people drinking who were capable of shoving over the top (most were 200bb plus) thinking they had FE and the villain in this case was pretty much never 3b/folding.
That said, given what happened: he had QQ and said he
knew I had aces and unless he flopped a set he wasn't putting in a penny more (the less said about this the better) - I'd have to agree with your first sentence in the second paragraph...
It was a real mindfuck of a hand. Despite the general consensus in here I was super close to folding. I realise that given pot odds etc and that his range should contain more than just QQ it would be a super tight fold (possibly very bad in fact) but given live tells etc I was close to making it.
I'm the long-time banned WMF. AWOOGA.