Dave, all the younger lads laugh at people betting to find out were they are. Is sizing your turn bet to fold out xx not the same thing in a roundabout way. Not a level just curious to know if it's different
Well, I spose it's a similar strategy, but the thinking behind it is very different imo, the concept of "finding out where you are" as I have seen it time after time would be raising your A7 on AT8 just to "see if the other guy has an ACE" - the reasons this is a terrible strategy are a) when you ARE behind, you're putting not far off the same money in as you would be calling 2 streets and folding (so you dont get a chance to spike 2pair or show the hand down losing a ton of equity) b) people can jam stuff like J9/Q9 etc if they think ur raise folding a badish Ace (obvs burning equity) and 3) you're stopping someone from barreling his chips off when he DOESN'T have the hand by over-repping ur hand.
The idea of betting the turn in my hand was because I gave his range a reasonable amount of weight to hands like
,
,
all of which have good equity vs my actual hand, but should be under it vs my range hence why I expected him to fold those hands, I also have 3 nut outs and some equity that I'm thinking will be exclusive a decent % of the time when called so I'm effectivley semi-bluffing. If I thought he wasn't going to fold mid-ish Qx's or any flush draw then I would have chk/folded the turn. So i'm pretty clear on where I am in the hand, I am taking a line which maximises my equity vs the range of hands I have assigned him, If my range's are wrong/misjudged then the chances are I will make a small mistake on a later street.
It's the river where I think my hand gets interesting....