Very deep... call/fold?

[amcgrath1uk]

PokerStars Game #63717299144: Tournament #426010564, $5.00+$0.50 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XXXII (7000/14000) - 2011/06/23 22:50:48 WET [2011/06/23 17:50:48 ET]
Table '426010564 148' 9-max Seat #8 is the button
Seat 1: bamseditlev (154198 in chips)
Seat 2: amcgrath1uk (225380 in chips)
Seat 4: barbiegirl52 (150440 in chips)
Seat 5: Panumanu (128251 in chips)
Seat 6: Izzzmine (86716 in chips)
Seat 7: derkunde (163335 in chips)
Seat 8: labrador1964 (249599 in chips)
bamseditlev: posts the ante 1750
amcgrath1uk: posts the ante 1750
barbiegirl52: posts the ante 1750
Panumanu: posts the ante 1750
Izzzmine: posts the ante 1750
derkunde: posts the ante 1750
labrador1964: posts the ante 1750
bamseditlev: posts small blind 7000
amcgrath1uk: posts big blind 14000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to amcgrath1uk [ ]
barbiegirl52: folds
Panumanu: folds
Izzzmine: folds
derkunde: raises 147585 to 161585 and is all-in
labrador1964: raises 86264 to 247849 and is all-in
bamseditlev: folds
JMøller is connected
amcgrath1uk: ?

Labrador1964 hasn't been particularly active, and we're down to approx 50 from a starting 3998.

Call or fold?

[Longy]

Never passing, we have a queen and another queen right?

[outragous76]

when you say very deep you dont mean stacked I assume

call

[muckthenuts]

what the other two said

[amcgrath1uk]

Never passing, we have a queen and another queen right?

We do. However I found this a tough spot, especially as I'd been on the same table as Labrador for about an hour and not seen him do much.

[paulhouk03]

folding queens isnt fun

[amcgrath1uk]

folding queens isnt fun

nope it isn't. But I couldn't see Labrador re-shoving with less than KK.

[MC]

folding queens isnt fun

nope it isn't. But I couldn't see Labrador re-shoving with less than KK.

You think his button re-shove range vs a 12bb cut-off shove is KK+?!

My range is going to be in the A9+, A8s+, 55+, KQ zone, villain dependant. Surely we have to assume a tight player is at least AJ+, 88+ here?

I'm snap calling TT+, AQ+ in your spot, so QQ isn't even a decision dude.

[Longy]

folding queens isnt fun

nope it isn't. But I couldn't see Labrador re-shoving with less than KK.

Well you are kind of answering your own question here. I would be v surprised if he didn't have AK or JJ at least in his range in this spot.

[cambridgealex]

50p

[SuuPRlim]

we have less than 30bigs?

I would desribe this as shallow personally

[pleno1]

wtf? snap?

[Doobs]

we have less than 30bigs?

I would desribe this as shallow personally

way less than 30 bigs.

snap obv

[Pinchop73]

Deep itm, sat on 16bigs, with two shoves in front of us, and we've woken up with QQ's?! Sick life.

Even if he's 8/7, he's only sat on 17bb's himself and will shove much wider than normal to go hu with the original shove. Ship it!

Results orientated threads ftmfw.

[amcgrath1uk]

Nope not results orientated.

I called and tripled up. I was heavily debating folding, mainly due to how tight the re-shover had been playing. He had AK, and was dead by the turn.