AlexMartin
|
 |
« Reply #45 on: September 06, 2011, 09:50:57 PM » |
|
sizing is weird, but i love it if he has a set/straight.
i be called a nit here, but i'd prob fold turn.
turn fold seems standard?
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cambridgealex
|
 |
« Reply #46 on: September 06, 2011, 10:54:24 PM » |
|
Can someone please explain to me why we're folding the turn when we beat J4 Q4 J9 and 94, all of which he could easily have in this spot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Poker goals: [ ] 7 figure score [X] 8 figure score
|
|
|
George2Loose
|
 |
« Reply #47 on: September 06, 2011, 11:07:07 PM » |
|
Can someone please explain to me why we're folding the turn when we beat J4 Q4 J9 and 94, all of which he could easily have in this spot.
Cos he's gonna pwn you on the river with 74o?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Ole Ole Ole Ole!
|
|
|
AlexMartin
|
 |
« Reply #48 on: September 07, 2011, 12:07:57 AM » |
|
Can someone please explain to me why we're folding the turn when we beat J4 Q4 J9 and 94, all of which he could easily have in this spot.
because the pot went super-multiway and he probably shouldnt ever raise any of those hands for value? Plus his raising range generally consists of v few bluffs, very strong made hands and very high equity semibluffs, which we'r gonna be oop to on a lot of dirty rivers....
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
cambridgealex
|
 |
« Reply #49 on: September 07, 2011, 03:06:11 AM » |
|
Can someone please explain to me why we're folding the turn when we beat J4 Q4 J9 and 94, all of which he could easily have in this spot.
because the pot went super-multiway and he probably shouldnt ever raise any of those hands for value? Plus his raising range generally consists of v few bluffs, very strong made hands and very high equity semibluffs, which we'r gonna be oop to on a lot of dirty rivers.... probably shouldnt raise two pair but this guy would. this guy wouldnt semi bluff draws can spaz out im convinced folding the turn vs this guy is wrong
|
|
|
Logged
|
Poker goals: [ ] 7 figure score [X] 8 figure score
|
|
|
AlexMartin
|
 |
« Reply #50 on: September 07, 2011, 06:58:09 AM » |
|
i dont think its really a case of right or wrong, just think its gonna be a really high-variance spot.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pleno1
|
 |
« Reply #51 on: September 07, 2011, 09:33:45 AM » |
|
Ahhh. Disagree. Dunno why pleno and Pinchop have decided the river sizing is especially 'big' or 'weird'.
Because its live cash, $210 into $240 is without doubt a HUGE bet in live cash.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
 |
« Reply #52 on: September 07, 2011, 09:37:09 AM » |
|
Ahhh. Disagree. Dunno why pleno and Pinchop have decided the river sizing is especially 'big' or 'weird'.
Because its live cash, $210 into $240 is without doubt a HUGE bet in live cash. Meh, when you take the ex rate into consideration it's not really that much.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member

Offline
Posts: 20728
|
 |
« Reply #53 on: September 07, 2011, 10:40:25 AM » |
|
That is both a silly reason and made up pleno
|
|
|
Logged
|
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
|
|
|
pleno1
|
 |
« Reply #54 on: September 07, 2011, 10:55:33 AM » |
|
not the $ amount its the btpa (bet to pot amount) that looks very big in live 200nl game.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
pleno1
|
 |
« Reply #55 on: September 07, 2011, 10:57:57 AM » |
|
That is both a silly reason and made up pleno
what is
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
SuuPRlim
|
 |
« Reply #56 on: September 07, 2011, 11:28:05 AM » |
|
river sizing seems ridic stnd to me. I honestly think people bet too small in live cash all the time which is daft because people tend to call pretty in-elastically
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
mondatoo
|
 |
« Reply #57 on: September 07, 2011, 11:39:31 AM » |
|
not the $ amount its the btpa (bet to pot amount) that looks very big in live 200nl game.

|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
pleno1
|
 |
« Reply #58 on: September 07, 2011, 11:46:29 AM » |
|
betting <200 reps a far wwder value range and can only see him taking this exact line with exactly 108cc/k10cc.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
|
|
|
SuuPRlim
|
 |
« Reply #59 on: September 07, 2011, 11:52:05 AM » |
|
80% pot bet doesnt need to get called as often to show the same profit + we have more of a chance of making more money etc.
thats how i see it anyways, when i have a good hand like 2 pair I bet big as a general rule lol
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|