blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 29, 2025, 10:25:08 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262573 Posts in 66610 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Very interesting hand IMHOOFC
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Very interesting hand IMHOOFC  (Read 2070 times)
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« on: November 16, 2011, 04:23:31 PM »

Hi, will post the link as dont have the converter etc.

http://weaktight.com/4103844

Guy has got increasingly aggresive since hero got deep, villain likes to get to showdwon and hero has a really bad image.

Thoughts?

Flop? Should we be betting this deep vs 3bet?

Turn line? What we feeling about c/f, c/c ?

River?

If we are villian what should we be checking behind? What should we be bluffing? WHat should we be valuing?
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
Solaris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: November 16, 2011, 06:10:23 PM »

Think as played it's fine. I might be check/folding the flop, especially as villain is described as being very aggro now we're deep. I check the river nearly always. It's a ridiculously thin spot to be betting for value. The only hand that might call a river bet is the hand he has as we have the .

Given that you have a bad image, I'm checking the river back as the villain. Don't need to turn my hand into a bluff and don't expect to be called by worse.
Logged
Bully87
Just a 50NL Fish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 385



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: November 16, 2011, 06:14:04 PM »

CBetting with nothing and binking turn vs passive showdown player, what a life!

As played for me, I'd be CBetting the majority of the time on that board once I've 4b pre, once he calls I'd shut down unless you bink the turn, Villain has played his hand way to passively post flop.

Possibly missed a bet on river? I don't hate a check but if he's passive and bombs river and I've got TPTK I'd do a little sick and probably fold, lucky villain has played his hand like a wuss and you scoop it.

River Solaris, if he bets, c/c or c/f?
Logged
zerofive
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1884


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: November 16, 2011, 06:17:50 PM »

A lot of players at the low mid stakes tend to think they've being levelled loads and end up confusing themselves when they start playing too aggressively. Presuming villain doesn't have a history/stats of this level of aggression during normal play? Couple this with your reads/image, I'd have a hard time not shoving for value on the river. I know it doesn't look like we're beating much, but with the AKQ of clubs dead, he rarely shows up with a flush. We're worried about QQ/JJ/KQ s. Nothing misses so check/call river seems like a waste. He has what it looks like he has.

With your image as bad as you say it is, I'm not check/folding turn. We could check call to make our hand look like the bare ace of clubs, then check call river when AQ seems like a decent value bet spot versus your one-barrel range.

Too thin?
Logged
Solaris
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1056


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: November 16, 2011, 06:24:00 PM »

Only river bet we can make is a shove Bully, surely? We have 160 or so back with the pot being 245.

I c/f the river. I can't see what holdings he has that bet the river that we beat?
Logged
Bully87
Just a 50NL Fish
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 385



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: November 16, 2011, 06:28:22 PM »

Only river bet we can make is a shove Bully, surely? We have 160 or so back with the pot being 245.

I c/f the river. I can't see what holdings he has that bet the river that we beat?

Would have been my choice too if he bet, TPTK is so minging most of the time, espesh vs passive players. HEM stats would help too, granted you mentioned he's got more aggro now your deeper but his general habits depending on sample size will probably be the same.
Logged
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: November 16, 2011, 07:29:52 PM »

A lot of players at the low mid stakes tend to think they've being levelled loads and end up confusing themselves when they start playing too aggressively. Presuming villain doesn't have a history/stats of this level of aggression during normal play? Couple this with your reads/image, I'd have a hard time not shoving for value on the river. I know it doesn't look like we're beating much, but with the AKQ of clubs dead, he rarely shows up with a flush. We're worried about QQ/JJ/KQ s. Nothing misses so check/call river seems like a waste. He has what it looks like he has.

With your image as bad as you say it is, I'm not check/folding turn. We could check call to make our hand look like the bare ace of clubs, then check call river when AQ seems like a decent value bet spot versus your one-barrel range.

Too thin?

shoving river as value would be ridic imo, with AK. we are 300bbs deep at start of play guys.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
zerofive
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1884


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: November 16, 2011, 08:09:21 PM »

Stats would be useful. You've described him as terrible and he thinks you're worse.
Logged
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: November 16, 2011, 08:11:48 PM »

You've described him as terrible

huh where?

dont think stats are super important here especially fold to 4bet etc. as we are deep.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: November 17, 2011, 08:11:59 PM »

im pretty sure theoretically vs someone decent its a c/f >> a bet or a jam

I assume we were c/f yh?
Logged

Ragz
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 164


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: November 18, 2011, 01:57:15 PM »

Villain is aggressive but likes to get to showdown? Kind of contradicting analysis of villain there so it's hard to judge the best play. If he's aggressive with bluff potential full stop then I like c/c turn c/c river. If he prefers to get to showdown asap then I think your line is fine.
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2011, 06:40:07 PM »

c/c the river is far ad away the worst of the options imo
Logged

DMorgan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4440



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: November 19, 2011, 07:15:25 PM »

Seems pretty standard to this point, now c/f
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.173 seconds with 19 queries.