DTD Monte Carlo £250,000 Gtd: Day 3 and final

[TightEnd]

Thanks for the rail guys, so appreciate it.

Really really cross with myself for my exit hand...so stupid.

Nevermind. Live and learn.

Gl to the guys left in. Was an awesome final.

Well played, fantastic effort

Will forgive you the spoiler....

[Woodsey]

spoilers itt

LOL

[The_duke]

Thanks for the rail guys, so appreciate it.

Really really cross with myself for my exit hand...so stupid.

Nevermind. Live and learn.

Gl to the guys left in. Was an awesome final.

ooops

[Whollyflush]

never ever get someone world-class in the commentary box DTD. would be disastrous for the poker world. dont mind trumpers commentary(he obv has his own style/slightly unusual thought process), but just imagine if u had someone who played a lot in there and all these ppl listening!

haha this.

[George2Loose]

Pretty standard call Bob imo. And why is A5 a snap and A4 a fold?

shows what I know - I thought Jake's A4 was a fold

I would have folded that tbh.

Against Alex it's a call. Against the other two an easy fold

Your say that like it's the only possible answer. I'm thinking bigger picture, Cody has a playable stack now and has a good chance of running over the table, he does not need to gamble. I think its marginal tbh.

His edge actually comes from knowing the A4 is a call here in the long run

I understand, but you can argue it both ways, its not as clear cut as your saying I don't think. Even Jake had to think about it, he knew it was marginal for him.

Case in point. Cody just rejams QJ against Alex. Again you could argue he can use his edge in better spots. In fact this is a good spot and Jake is good enough to know it

[dakky]

Pretty standard call Bob imo. And why is A5 a snap and A4 a fold?

shows what I know - I thought Jake's A4 was a fold

I would have folded that tbh.

Against Alex it's a call. Against the other two an easy fold

Your say that like it's the only possible answer. I'm thinking bigger picture, Cody has a playable stack now and has a good chance of running over the table, he does not need to gamble. I think its marginal tbh.

I agree with you here as it goes due to the makeup of the table. Put three top regs there and its a call

[claypole]

"what do they call that - an anagram" - PMSL

Ul Alex - vwp, was rooting for you two heads up....obv you and Jake

[Pinchop73]

His edge actually comes from knowing the A4 is a call here in the long run

This.

A short stacked Golder is going to be shoving much wider bvb. Got to take your 65/35s.

[smashedagain]

Thanks for the rail guys, so appreciate it.

Really really cross with myself for my exit hand...so stupid.

Nevermind. Live and learn.

Gl to the guys left in. Was an awesome final.

Well played, fantastic effort

Will forgive you the spoiler....

no say its a sick joke and mitch has got into your account

[Alonso]

Thanks for the rail guys, so appreciate it.

Really really cross with myself for my exit hand...so stupid.

Nevermind. Live and learn.

Gl to the guys left in. Was an awesome final.

Where'is spoiler alert?

[Woodsey]

Pretty standard call Bob imo. And why is A5 a snap and A4 a fold?

shows what I know - I thought Jake's A4 was a fold

I would have folded that tbh.

Against Alex it's a call. Against the other two an easy fold

Your say that like it's the only possible answer. I'm thinking bigger picture, Cody has a playable stack now and has a good chance of running over the table, he does not need to gamble. I think its marginal tbh.

His edge actually comes from knowing the A4 is a call here in the long run

I understand, but you can argue it both ways, its not as clear cut as your saying I don't think. Even Jake had to think about it, he knew it was marginal for him.

Case in point. Cody just rejams QJ against Alex. Again you could argue he can use his edge in better spots. In fact this is a good spot and Jake is good enough to know it

But as you know re-jamming is totally different than calling  

That's the beauty of poker there often isn't a 100% correct answer

[George2Loose]

Pretty standard call Bob imo. And why is A5 a snap and A4 a fold?

shows what I know - I thought Jake's A4 was a fold

I would have folded that tbh.

Against Alex it's a call. Against the other two an easy fold

Your say that like it's the only possible answer. I'm thinking bigger picture, Cody has a playable stack now and has a good chance of running over the table, he does not need to gamble. I think its marginal tbh.

His edge actually comes from knowing the A4 is a call here in the long run

I understand, but you can argue it both ways, its not as clear cut as your saying I don't think. Even Jake had to think about it, he knew it was marginal for him.

Case in point. Cody just rejams QJ against Alex. Again you could argue he can use his edge in better spots. In fact this is a good spot and Jake is good enough to know it

But as you know re-jamming is totally different than calling  

That's the beauty of poker there often isn't a 100% correct answer

ICM

[Pinchop73]

boom

[Woodsey]

Pretty standard call Bob imo. And why is A5 a snap and A4 a fold?

shows what I know - I thought Jake's A4 was a fold

I would have folded that tbh.

Against Alex it's a call. Against the other two an easy fold

Your say that like it's the only possible answer. I'm thinking bigger picture, Cody has a playable stack now and has a good chance of running over the table, he does not need to gamble. I think its marginal tbh.

His edge actually comes from knowing the A4 is a call here in the long run

I understand, but you can argue it both ways, its not as clear cut as your saying I don't think. Even Jake had to think about it, he knew it was marginal for him.

Case in point. Cody just rejams QJ against Alex. Again you could argue he can use his edge in better spots. In fact this is a good spot and Jake is good enough to know it

But as you know re-jamming is totally different than calling  

That's the beauty of poker there often isn't a 100% correct answer

ICM

This ain't a $10 MTT you know  

Anyway, we can agree to disagree.

[mondatoo]

Great result Alex very well done and a sick effort at the B2B, congrats.