blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 25, 2025, 04:46:01 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262439 Posts in 66607 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Satellite Spot
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Satellite Spot  (Read 4191 times)
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: April 04, 2012, 01:33:40 PM »

if you know for a fact he's not going to make a bad call then, jam ATC ainec.

It depends on what Eso meant by getting it right 90% of the time.

If it's that the guy's a good satellite player and won't make any mistakes then yes it's a shove atc.

If it's that the guy knows what you're shoving with and will call with better then it's very different.

On reflection I think it is more of this and therefore we should only be jamming the top end of our range then?
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
action man
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10650



View Profile WWW
« Reply #16 on: April 04, 2012, 02:09:41 PM »

if you know for a fact he's not going to make a bad call then, jam ATC ainec.

It depends on what Eso meant by getting it right 90% of the time.

If it's that the guy's a good satellite player and won't make any mistakes then yes it's a shove atc.

If it's that the guy knows what you're shoving with and will call with better then it's very different.

On reflection I think it is more of this and therefore we should only be jamming the top end of our range then?

if its that rich your friend is a fish. Still jamming what i would in this spot in an mtt then Ax+ Kx+ most Q's  anything suited etc.
Logged
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: April 04, 2012, 02:11:39 PM »

if you know for a fact he's not going to make a bad call then, jam ATC ainec.

It depends on what Eso meant by getting it right 90% of the time.

If it's that the guy's a good satellite player and won't make any mistakes then yes it's a shove atc.

If it's that the guy knows what you're shoving with and will call with better then it's very different.

On reflection I think it is more of this and therefore we should only be jamming the top end of our range then?

if its that rich your friend is a fish. Still jamming what i would in this spot in an mtt then Ax+ Kx+ most Q's  anything suited etc.
I jammed Q7o
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
action man
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10650



View Profile WWW
« Reply #18 on: April 04, 2012, 02:21:03 PM »

think its fine
Logged
DMorgan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4440



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: April 04, 2012, 02:29:27 PM »

Any 2 if he knows his satellite ICM shizzle. Would begin to fold out maybe the bottom 5-10% if you think he's gunna make some sort of lol call with AJs
Logged

smashedagain
moderator of moderators
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 12402


if you are gonna kiss arse you have to do it right


View Profile
« Reply #20 on: April 04, 2012, 03:39:31 PM »

I think the Villan understands ICM to mean ice-cream van IMO Smiley
Logged

[ ] ept title
[ ] wpt title
[ ] wsop braclet
[X] mickey mouse hoodies
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #21 on: April 04, 2012, 03:54:20 PM »

Yeah I am atc against anyone with a clue. Start chopping off the bottom of your range the more incomptent villain is. Think I would shove q7o against anyone who hasn't proved to be an utter headcase.

Logged
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #22 on: April 04, 2012, 03:57:29 PM »

ATC is profitable with ICM, and Q7o is the nuts, has an overcard to JJ Wink which is probably (well should be) the bottom of his calling range i would guess?
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #23 on: April 04, 2012, 03:58:32 PM »

ATC is profitable with ICM, and Q7o is the nuts, has an overcard to JJ Wink which is probably (well should be) the bottom of his calling range i would guess?
The bottom of his calling range was way lower than JJ   Wink
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: April 04, 2012, 03:59:48 PM »

ATC is profitable with ICM, and Q7o is the nuts, has an overcard to JJ Wink which is probably (well should be) the bottom of his calling range i would guess?
The bottom of his calling range was way lower than JJ   Wink

It definitely shouldnt be much lower. ICM > ranges
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
DMorgan
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4440



View Profile
« Reply #25 on: April 04, 2012, 04:10:53 PM »

The bottom of his calling range was way lower than JJ   Wink


Then you need to re-evaluate this

I would say his calling range will be 90%+ correct as he is a decent winner on this site.

Still definitely shoving Q7o vs anyone though
Logged

EvilPie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14241



View Profile
« Reply #26 on: April 04, 2012, 04:11:59 PM »

What's it a satellite for? If it's a low buy in I think you can factor in the mate's spite call factor as well.

He probably knows that even if he's ahead he should fold but thinks he'll call with K2 because he knows you're shoving very wide and any king is enormous.
Logged

Motivational speeches at their best:

"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
EvilPie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14241



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: April 04, 2012, 04:14:05 PM »


I would say his calling range will be 90%+ correct as he is a decent winner on this site.


Assuming it's DTD this argument won't stand up in court.
Logged

Motivational speeches at their best:

"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #28 on: April 04, 2012, 04:15:24 PM »

The bottom of his calling range was way lower than JJ   Wink


Then you need to re-evaluate this

I would say his calling range will be 90%+ correct as he is a decent winner on this site.

Still definitely shoving Q7o vs anyone though
Maybe gave him too much credit for correct calling range in a satty.
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
Eso Kral
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6910


Lucky in Life!!


View Profile
« Reply #29 on: April 04, 2012, 04:18:22 PM »

What's it a satellite for? If it's a low buy in I think you can factor in the mate's spite call factor as well.

He probably knows that even if he's ahead he should fold but thinks he'll call with K2 because he knows you're shoving very wide and any king is enormous.
£150 DTD tourney  ^^ is probs his thinking
Logged

Andrew Charles Blacklock - Lived for those he loved and those he loved remember.
Pages: 1 [2] 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.118 seconds with 19 queries.