|
kukushkin88
|
 |
« Reply #330 on: October 01, 2012, 10:38:10 PM » |
|
Fell asleep and missed the 2nd half of last nights game. I backed Eagles to beat the spread and ended up with a push, having told myself I was backing a suggestion in this thread by someone who knew their stuff. I found myself reading lots of posts by Kukushkin88 and then felt like a right wally this morning when I checked scores to see that Eagles won but never beat the spread.
Thoughts on the MNF game? with some analysis folks for a newby who doesn't quite understand NFL.
Surely there was plenty of Philly -1 about? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
The Camel
|
|
« Reply #331 on: October 01, 2012, 10:41:03 PM » |
|
Fell asleep and missed the 2nd half of last nights game. I backed Eagles to beat the spread and ended up with a push, having told myself I was backing a suggestion in this thread by someone who knew their stuff. I found myself reading lots of posts by Kukushkin88 and then felt like a right wally this morning when I checked scores to see that Eagles won but never beat the spread.
Thoughts on the MNF game? with some analysis folks for a newby who doesn't quite understand NFL.
In short, key battle is Dallas pass rush v Chicago O line. If Cutler gets enough time, he could have a huge day. Big if though. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
|
|
|
|
kukushkin88
|
|
« Reply #332 on: October 01, 2012, 10:48:16 PM » |
|
Fell asleep and missed the 2nd half of last nights game. I backed Eagles to beat the spread and ended up with a push, having told myself I was backing a suggestion in this thread by someone who knew their stuff. I found myself reading lots of posts by Kukushkin88 and then felt like a right wally this morning when I checked scores to see that Eagles won but never beat the spread.
Thoughts on the MNF game? with some analysis folks for a newby who doesn't quite understand NFL.
In short, key battle is Dallas pass rush v Chicago O line. If Cutler gets enough time, he could have a huge day. Big if though. Over 41.5 on the points perhaps? It´s not completely dependent on Cutler having a big night but if he does then it´s pretty much there. Haven´t really done the research and don´t really have time to, so if I do have a bet it will be minimum stakes. It just seems a little low in spite of both teams problems on the O-Line. Any view from a Dallas fan?? |
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 01, 2012, 10:51:03 PM by kukushkin88 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bobby1
|
|
« Reply #333 on: October 01, 2012, 10:58:40 PM » |
|
Small bet Dallas -3 for me, Hopefully their pass rush will give Cutler as many problems as GB did and when that happens Cutler just takes chances. Dallas CB are much improved this year too so he could find it tough when he does get time.
Looks like Forte will start at RB but prob share carries with Bush for Chicago with Bush prob getting the goal line work again but they both seem to still be less than 100% with Forte returning quickly from his ankle and Bush hurting his shoulder last week.
Dallas O hasn't really clicked the last two games but away at Seattle is always a struggle and they did enough to win last time out so I'm hoping they do the same again tho its a small bet.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
“The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.”
|
|
|
|
AceHighSuited
|
|
« Reply #334 on: October 01, 2012, 11:03:37 PM » |
|
Fell asleep and missed the 2nd half of last nights game. I backed Eagles to beat the spread and ended up with a push, having told myself I was backing a suggestion in this thread by someone who knew their stuff. I found myself reading lots of posts by Kukushkin88 and then felt like a right wally this morning when I checked scores to see that Eagles won but never beat the spread.
Thoughts on the MNF game? with some analysis folks for a newby who doesn't quite understand NFL.
Surely there was plenty of Philly -1 about? Might have been bud, but I got crushed yesterday with European comeback in the golf. If Furyk had have won his match regardless of other results I have my biggest winning day in last 14 months. As a result I only had funds in one place available last night, and played the -2. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AceHighSuited
|
|
« Reply #335 on: October 01, 2012, 11:09:11 PM » |
|
Thanks guys appreciate the responses. I'll have a few small bets for entertainment value, I am off work tomorrow so can stay up and watch whole game.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
AceHighSuited
|
|
« Reply #336 on: October 02, 2012, 01:41:15 AM » |
|
the tremendous lack of proper coverage from the bbc has me seething hard.
Why can't we just have MNF back on ESPN like last year?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
action man
|
|
« Reply #337 on: October 02, 2012, 01:24:53 PM » |
|
early thoughts on packers -7 at indy and
browns +10 at giants plz
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #338 on: October 02, 2012, 03:24:00 PM » |
|
I backed the Packers last week and thought they were a very good bet but after the last few weeks results I have just come to the conclusion that they aren't all that good. The O line in particular just isn't protecting Rodgers that well. If I had to pick a 7 point favourite on the road this week I would much rather back the Texans.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
bobby1
|
|
« Reply #339 on: October 02, 2012, 05:55:37 PM » |
|
I thought this could be quite interesting. The three teams that have beaten New Orleans before the Packers did were all well beaten ATS the week after, it could be that beating the Saints is being over rated for the teams and in the lines.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: October 02, 2012, 05:57:26 PM by bobby1 »
|
Logged
|
“The two most important days in your life are the day you are born and the day you find out why.”
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #340 on: October 02, 2012, 08:57:29 PM » |
|
I saw an interesting stat that all of the teams that had beaten the Saints hadn't won another game themselves which leads me to believe the Saints just aren't that good. They aren't getting beat by world beaters so Green Bay just sneaking by them isn't that impressive. Also Seattle flattered against them and I am not yet totally convinced by San Fran. I gave them a chance last week to prove they were a decent team but now I am fairly convinced they aren't yet they will be overbet for a while yet because they are Green Bay, they were nearly unbeaten last year and also possibly because they "should" have beat the Seahawks but actually they stunk for the first half of that game and allowed a ridiculous number of sacks. I haven't done enough work yet but I am almost certainly a backer of an Indy side that should be improving at +7.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Simon Galloway
|
|
« Reply #341 on: October 03, 2012, 07:45:45 PM » |
|
Miami fans will know about her, everyone else can just admire the scenery. | Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
action man
|
|
« Reply #342 on: October 04, 2012, 12:09:58 AM » |
|
I saw an interesting stat that all of the teams that had beaten the Saints hadn't won another game themselves which leads me to believe the Saints just aren't that good. They aren't getting beat by world beaters so Green Bay just sneaking by them isn't that impressive. Also Seattle flattered against them and I am not yet totally convinced by San Fran. I gave them a chance last week to prove they were a decent team but now I am fairly convinced they aren't yet they will be overbet for a while yet because they are Green Bay, they were nearly unbeaten last year and also possibly because they "should" have beat the Seahawks but actually they stunk for the first half of that game and allowed a ridiculous number of sacks. I haven't done enough work yet but I am almost certainly a backer of an Indy side that should be improving at +7.
up to £500 at +7 if you want it |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #343 on: October 04, 2012, 12:20:55 AM » |
|
Miami fans will know about her, everyone else can just admire the scenery. | Click to see full-size image. |
That wall needs rendering |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
|
redarmi
|
|
« Reply #344 on: October 04, 2012, 10:38:49 PM » |
|
I saw an interesting stat that all of the teams that had beaten the Saints hadn't won another game themselves which leads me to believe the Saints just aren't that good. They aren't getting beat by world beaters so Green Bay just sneaking by them isn't that impressive. Also Seattle flattered against them and I am not yet totally convinced by San Fran. I gave them a chance last week to prove they were a decent team but now I am fairly convinced they aren't yet they will be overbet for a while yet because they are Green Bay, they were nearly unbeaten last year and also possibly because they "should" have beat the Seahawks but actually they stunk for the first half of that game and allowed a ridiculous number of sacks. I haven't done enough work yet but I am almost certainly a backer of an Indy side that should be improving at +7.
up to £500 at +7 if you want it Only just seen this and not sure if line moved after. Happy to take 300 if you still want it but understand if not. |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Author