blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 28, 2025, 07:56:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262547 Posts in 66609 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  Using accumulators to get the best of it by gambling on what the going will be
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Using accumulators to get the best of it by gambling on what the going will be  (Read 2972 times)
aaron1867
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3386



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: November 29, 2012, 05:34:52 AM »

I have read this and I do not understand hardly any of it. I can only just understand that we are betting in doubles on horses that prefer a certain condition, therefore this is getting us value? it would be terribly hard to predict the going in a horse race, but understand theory slightly I suppose.

I probably am likely to understand this a lot less as I am a a backer on singles rather than a double/treble, etc.

edit: red is in thread Smiley Smiley
« Last Edit: November 29, 2012, 05:37:17 AM by aaron1867 » Logged
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: November 29, 2012, 06:34:41 AM »

Don't feel embarassed because your concept isn't original.

I thought I was the inventor of "one hand one bounce" at playground cricket when I was eight.

Yes, I learned of that when I was about 6, & I was told you had invented it previously....
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.048 seconds with 20 queries.