blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 28, 2024, 12:08:00 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272608 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Flop 2 pair facing raise
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Flop 2 pair facing raise  (Read 1682 times)
ShipItHollaBallaaa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 35


View Profile
« on: February 18, 2013, 10:41:27 PM »

Hi guys,

My first strat post on here. Don't rly have any pther poker playing friends to ask and I've seen some v good strategy posts on here so would like some of your guys' insight thanks.

Villain is a reg playing 16/14/5

How would you have played it?

Poker Stars $0.25/$0.50 No Limit Hold'em - 8 players - View hand 2107307
DeucesCracked Poker Videos Hand History Converter

MP1: $50.00
MP2: $40.58
CO: $17.50
BTN: $21.25
SB: $51.44
BB: $81.96
UTG: $26.05
Hero (UTG+1): $71.84

Pre Flop: ($0.75) Hero is UTG+1 with T A
1 fold, Hero raises to $1.50, MP1 calls $1.50, 5 folds

Flop: ($3.75) T Q A (2 players)
Hero bets $2.50, MP1 raises to $7.50, Hero calls $5

Turn: ($18.75) 5 (2 players)
Hero checks, MP1 bets $10.75, Hero calls $10.75

River: ($40.25) 7 (2 players)
Hero checks, MP1 bets $30.25 all in, Hero folds
Logged
sedds
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: February 18, 2013, 10:54:12 PM »

I think its a folds vs vs a 16/14's flatting range here, he probably has all combos of TT/QQ some of AQ/AA. Even if you add AK and some Ax suited hands its still looks ugly equity wise. He would have to be bluffing a decent % with pocket pairs which seems extremely unlikely at 50nl without history, and obviously wouldn't be a great board to do it on.
Logged
ShipItHollaBallaaa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 35


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: February 18, 2013, 11:08:03 PM »

Cheers sedds, so you're advocating a fold on the flop?
Logged
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5483


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: February 18, 2013, 11:18:11 PM »

In FR I'm folding somewhere, not sure where but definitely somewhere. Prob river when we can remove AK etc imo. This is presuming a reg woudnt vb AK on the river, not qualified to comment there really.
Logged

[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
sedds
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: February 18, 2013, 11:23:46 PM »

np, yeah i think his flatting range here is going to be very tight, and the board really hits your perceived range so even if he did have some FDs/bluffable hands i don't think he would raise them in this spot. Combo wise we do block TT and AA and he may not flat KJ pre (though that would mean he doesn't flat QT either), but i think even though he doesn't rep that many hands, i think his bluff frequency is going to be extremely low.
Logged
sedds
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: February 18, 2013, 11:27:23 PM »

In FR I'm folding somewhere, not sure where but definitely somewhere. Prob river when we can remove AK etc imo. This is presuming a reg woudnt vb AK on the river, not qualified to comment there really.

Yeah i guess AK isn't impossible, though i think it would bad vs on this board vs anyone decent.
Logged
jgcblack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3445


C'est la vie


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: February 18, 2013, 11:37:06 PM »

I'm going to say its a call on the flop, a call on the turn, and a fold on the river...

I just don't see him having anything worse when he raises+triples too often.  There just aren't enough   type combos to make it ok imo.

He definitely seems nittier than most, I'd be tempted to peel this river the 'first' time.... mainly to understand what kind of reg he is (with the possibility we're good here some %)  Obviously on the tighter side of life.



also - possibly fold pre... this would be the ultimate bottom of my opening range for value with Ahigh..
Logged

sedds
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 26



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: February 19, 2013, 12:16:21 AM »

Even with an really optimistic range including some suited aces/AK and bluffs with KK/JJ our equity is still only about 50%. Though i think his range is much stronger than that. Any sort of pure bluff seems really unlikely in a FR game at 50nl in early positions, especially on a board that smashes an EP range. Vs a wider flatting range that includes more QJ/JT decent bluffing hands I would be more inclined to call down, but villain is probably multitabling/mass tabling and isn't going to be flatting much more than PPs/strong aces or planning to get out of line
Logged
jgcblack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3445


C'est la vie


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: February 19, 2013, 01:01:07 AM »

Even with an really optimistic range including some suited aces/AK and bluffs with KK/JJ our equity is still only about 50%. Though i think his range is much stronger than that. Any sort of pure bluff seems really unlikely in a FR game at 50nl in early positions, especially on a board that smashes an EP range. Vs a wider flatting range that includes more QJ/JT decent bluffing hands I would be more inclined to call down, but villain is probably multitabling/mass tabling and isn't going to be flatting much more than PPs/strong aces or planning to get out of line

This, he just has QQ... Cheesy
Logged

TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2448



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: February 19, 2013, 01:04:51 AM »

play 6max imo.

Also 16/14/5 for FR isn't tight at all if anything its on the loose side.
Logged

@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
ShipItHollaBallaaa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 35


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: February 19, 2013, 01:20:57 AM »



He definitely seems nittier than most, I'd be tempted to peel this river the 'first' time.... mainly to understand what kind of reg he is (with the possibility we're good here some %)  Obviously on the tighter side of life.



also - possibly fold pre... this would be the ultimate bottom of my opening range for value with Ahigh..

I've got 5k hands on him...he's fairly straight forward but decent enough reg.

play 6max imo.

Lol why do you say that?

Think sedds has pretty much nailed this hand tbh, cheers mate.
Logged
shipitonetime
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 327



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: February 19, 2013, 02:08:04 AM »

play 6max imo.

Also 16/14/5 for FR isn't tight at all if anything its on the loose side.

What are your stats shipitholla?
« Last Edit: February 19, 2013, 02:15:58 AM by shipitonetime » Logged
ShipItHollaBallaaa
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 35


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: February 19, 2013, 04:31:11 AM »

Only 24/18/5

I dont really like playing too loose tbh.
Logged
JustinSayne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 284


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: February 19, 2013, 08:27:06 AM »

Fold flop, its nitring and everyone has it.
Logged
jgcblack
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3445


C'est la vie


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: February 19, 2013, 08:42:26 AM »

play 6max imo.

Also 16/14/5 for FR isn't tight at all if anything its on the loose side.

What are your stats shipitholla?

Definitely play 6max and sack off the nitring games.

They're a joke.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.146 seconds with 21 queries.