Does Rasta get about reverse implied odds?
Who cares, he's fun to listen to.
I care...so there!
Nah don't really, just am lil confused how he doesn't seem to get it when giving 'crit' over hands, seems to be advocating always playing on feel and not caring about position nor above mentioned rev implied odds with hands like J9.
He's entertaining to a degree but i've only been listening 5 minutes and feel like my ears have been put through the ringer already, can't imagine he'd ever change his mind either-despite being given some very good advice from his co-commentator-in every situation they are seeing.
Don't be so results based Rasta, think/talk more about value and position please.
Does Rasta get about reverse implied odds?
That's Ed's domain Dom
It's just scary to think that some ppl may listen to Rasta talk over feel and believe it's the way to go as it's from a 'name' and a commentator-example-'we believe we can hit'.
Above is obv what I want everyone to become disciples to, let's make poker like it was 7 years ago.
Author