blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 25, 2025, 09:08:15 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262433 Posts in 66607 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  re-jam spot.		 0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: re-jam spot.  (Read 2200 times)
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« on: March 10, 2013, 10:07:01 PM »
what do we jam pre here?

sunday million, 3.5k left, 1600 itm

Table '710020010 92' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: Dhr. Awesome (10804 in chips)
Seat 2: pads1161 (58110 in chips)
Seat 3: hopezACE (37104 in chips)
Seat 4: lermonad (13026 in chips)
Seat 5: mst jun. (11486 in chips)
Seat 6: RodrigoFP (31935 in chips)
Seat 7: NutPopper (11974 in chips)
Seat 8: Samboha (6958 in chips)
Seat 9: SUPER00TILT (10396 in chips)
Dhr. Awesome: posts the ante 80
pads1161: posts the ante 80
hopezACE: posts the ante 80
lermonad: posts the ante 80
mst jun.: posts the ante 80
RodrigoFP: posts the ante 80
NutPopper: posts the ante 80
Samboha: posts the ante 80
SUPER00TILT: posts the ante 80
NutPopper: posts small blind 400
Samboha: posts big blind 800
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to pads1161 [X X]
SUPER00TILT: folds
Dhr. Awesome: raises 9924 to 10724 and is all-in
pads1161:

readless.
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 10, 2013, 10:14:06 PM »
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:12:47 PM
call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 10, 2013, 10:15:31 PM »
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:14:06 PM
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:12:47 PM
call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove

changed my mind actually, AJs AQo KQs 88
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
LonOhRay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 486



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 11, 2013, 04:16:36 AM »
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:15:31 PM
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:14:06 PM
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:12:47 PM
call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove

changed my mind actually, AJs AQo KQs 88

This and throw in an occasional J5o for miss click balance purposes
Logged
PathFinder
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 411



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 11, 2013, 03:42:16 PM »
There's only 2 stacks behind us that we should worry about as the rest are similar to initial jammer. He is however shoving UTG+1 so my range to re-jam is a little tighter:

AQ+ 1010+
Logged
dreenie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2382



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2013, 03:13:40 AM »
Think he at best has AK, so would jam AK and JJ+ think my range in this spot is gonna be super tight from his shove utg
Logged
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5371


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2013, 03:48:40 AM »
Quote from: LonOhRay on March 11, 2013, 04:16:36 AM
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:15:31 PM
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:14:06 PM
Quote from: TL900 on March 10, 2013, 10:12:47 PM
call with ATs AJo KQo 77 or summat, fold the bottom to the 30k stacks if they reshove

changed my mind actually, AJs AQo KQs 88

This and throw in an occasional J5o for miss click balance purposes

Really this loose? I'm not sure how much tighter I am, probably AQ+ and TT+, surely we are too early here? Readless= search his tables too. I guess Toms range is spot on vs any grinder but think the mil might be a touch too tight vs a readless utg jam.

<3 to J5o
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2013, 04:20:26 AM »
I did tighten it, didn't you see? :p
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
Rupert
:)
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2119



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2013, 07:51:53 AM »
flat entire range, TT+ AQs AK, 99 is close don't think anything else is
Logged
rupertelder.com ... @ruperte ... twitch'ing
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2013, 08:30:56 AM »
meh Tongue
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
LonOhRay
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 486



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2013, 05:06:59 PM »
I read it as 5/1k for some reason

Would go with Rupert's range wouldn't fold 99, stack isn't damaged if we lose
Logged
ashj22
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 114


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 18, 2013, 11:09:35 PM »
i think i re jam 99+ AQ+
Logged
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22504



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 18, 2013, 11:42:38 PM »
Calling KQs readless is definitely a mistake.
Logged
TL900
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2418



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 18, 2013, 11:49:03 PM »
Quote from: mondatoo on March 18, 2013, 11:42:38 PM
Calling KQs readless is definitely a mistake.

I agree, duno what I was smoking the day I wrote this
Logged
@MtSpewmore
Quote from: jgcblack
I wouldn't normally try so hard, but didn't have another opportunity I could wait for. I wasn't ready to surrender what I WANTED SO MUCH, that easily, I couldn't guarantee a call with me staying stoic and relying on a flinch "top pair" calling reflex.
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 19, 2013, 09:37:54 AM »
guy had 65o.
Logged
Quote from: TightEnd on December 16, 2013, 12:59:59 AM
Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.114 seconds with 19 queries.