blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 22, 2025, 08:07:03 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262362 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  HOT $33 turbo SAT $6.60 24SEATS
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: HOT $33 turbo SAT $6.60 24SEATS  (Read 1961 times)
Oxford_HRV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 644



View Profile
« on: March 23, 2013, 02:46:38 PM »

usual day to day scenario

110 players left

AVG: 18BBS we got 16 of them

we get dealt  in the small

UTG+1 goes all in for 5bb

HJ isolates all in for 29bb

are we usually flippin/crushing/crushed here?
~ is the majority calling or folding




Logged

To win at poker is to not have to play
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 23, 2013, 03:16:55 PM »

Kinda depends on what stacks he's shoving into. Highly doubt I'm folding though.
Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
dwayne110
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 670


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 24, 2013, 02:48:31 AM »

Given this is a satellite, how much does this change our strategy here/make the call closer, as underpairs to our hand are a high part of the re-shovers range here? Perhaps better spots to make a move ourselves with 16 bb's left, given he has us covered? I admit I think I'm rarely finding the fold button myself here(!), but from a satellite 'survival' strategy point of view is it correct play with 15-20 bb's?
Logged
JustinSayne
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 278


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 24, 2013, 07:23:31 PM »

This is a snap fold I think
Logged
SubZERO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 205


FINISH HIM!!!!! Babality


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 24, 2013, 11:07:10 PM »

The fact that this is a satellite doesnt really alter it for me here, we are way off the places and need to get chips

All the stack sizes would help, but without any reads I'm calling here although I do think its sorta close.
Logged
david3103
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6089



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 25, 2013, 09:25:05 AM »

We're a long way short of the seats but calling a reshove from someone who covers us seems optimistic to me.

Would reshove this myself in HJ though
Logged

It's more about the winning than the winnings

5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
BulldozerD
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1888



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 25, 2013, 11:20:44 AM »

prob call Ak but folding this
Logged
Oxford_HRV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 644



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 25, 2013, 03:06:37 PM »

Kinda depends on what stacks he's shoving into. Highly doubt I'm folding though.

everyone was circa avg, 12/20bb. BB was playing 7bb but that was about it off the top of my head.

seems after a little review its still close on call/fold

really i felt the same as dwayne110 that he would have 66+ at 75/80%ish of the time..

i really think it might be personal decision here on if we keep grinding, or is 16bbs ok to risk in here to win just about 40bb total

i decided we still want chips and it looked like we could scoop a huge pot, so clicked call and the guy flipped KK and held.

excluding the result this time it still looks really flippy to me on call/fold. next time i may opt to fold. ty guys
Logged

To win at poker is to not have to play
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22503



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 25, 2013, 03:50:54 PM »

If utgs jamming say 40% then to call here with AQ you need hj to be jamming 55+, ATos, A9s.

If they're both competent then it's a really easy rejam as utg should be jamming wider thus so will hj be.

Never played these low stakes sats but would assume std is pretty bad so it's bordering on a fold but it's really close and in game I'd probs have jammed.
« Last Edit: March 25, 2013, 03:56:28 PM by mondatoo » Logged
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 25, 2013, 03:53:32 PM »

meh, not folding
« Last Edit: March 25, 2013, 04:19:18 PM by MC » Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 16733


View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 25, 2013, 04:13:20 PM »

Optimistic to expect two competent people in a $5 sat.  I think it is a fold in a sat and not going to worry about it too much.  Would shove this in the hijack but first mover so important in sats.
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
MC
Super
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6260



View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 25, 2013, 04:21:10 PM »

If utgs jamming say 40% then to call here with AQ you need hj to be jamming 55+, ATos, A9s.

If they're both competent then it's a really easy rejam as utg should be jamming wider thus so will hj be.

Never played these low stakes sats but would assume std is pretty bad so it's bordering on a fold but it's really close and in game I'd probs have jammed.

If they're incompetent they probs get it in even wider, ergo more of a shove
Logged

"Success is not final, failure is not fatal"
@epitomised
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22503



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 25, 2013, 04:28:12 PM »

Optimistic to expect two competent people in a $5 sat.  I think it is a fold in a sat and not going to worry about it too much.  Would shove this in the hijack but first mover so important in sats.

Ye obv, thought hero itt would find the info interesting for future reference if he was to find himself in a similar spot in a different comp.

Would be beyond terrible to fold AQ in hj here.

I think it's close because if we are assuming hj isn't competent then I'd say there's a fairly high % of the time were he's guna flat AA/KK and if we take this out of his range and say he's jamming 77-QQ AJ+ ATs+ then AQ is a call.
Logged
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22503



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 25, 2013, 04:31:10 PM »

If utgs jamming say 40% then to call here with AQ you need hj to be jamming 55+, ATos, A9s.

If they're both competent then it's a really easy rejam as utg should be jamming wider thus so will hj be.

Never played these low stakes sats but would assume std is pretty bad so it's bordering on a fold but it's really close and in game I'd probs have jammed.

If they're incompetent they probs get it in even wider, ergo more of a shove

I disagree, the fact utg has only 5bbs in the 1st place, unless we have unknown info that he's just lost a decent pot then he's probs too nitty. Don't think randoms in hj are more likely to be rejamming wide here in a sat.

« Last Edit: March 25, 2013, 04:41:23 PM by mondatoo » Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 16733


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 25, 2013, 05:17:51 PM »

I assume bad players shove too tight as a rule.  They call wide but 3 bets are usually much tighter.  Think he would have to have pleno stats for me to call with 24 seats.

I would call if it was a one seat sat.

Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.09 seconds with 19 queries.