NigawG is the GREATEST'

[pleno1]

PokerStars Hand #98579722946: Tournament #2013050032, $50+$5 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level LIII (40000/80000) - 2013/05/14 22:01:42 CET [2013/05/14 16:01:42 ET]
Table '2013050032 346' 6-max Seat #4 is the button
Seat 1: gboro780 (4989628 in chips)
Seat 2: TMoney0209 (1926999 in chips)
Seat 3: Roothlus (12296444 in chips)
Seat 4: sms9231 (6033312 in chips)
Seat 5: NigDawG (6801617 in chips)
gboro780: posts the ante 10000
TMoney0209: posts the ante 10000
Roothlus: posts the ante 10000
sms9231: posts the ante 10000
NigDawG: posts the ante 10000
NigDawG: posts small blind 40000
gboro780: posts big blind 80000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
TMoney0209: folds
Roothlus: folds
sms9231: raises 85000 to 165000
NigDawG: raises 285000 to 450000
gboro780: folds
sms9231: calls 285000
*** FLOP *** [ ]
NigDawG: bets 480000
sms9231: calls 480000
*** TURN *** [ ] []
NigDawG: bets 1200000
sms9231: raises 3893312 to 5093312 and is all-in
NigDawG: calls 3893312
*** RIVER *** [ ] []
*** SHOW DOWN ***
NigDawG: shows [ ] (two pair, Kings and Sixes)
sms9231: shows [ ] (three of a kind, Sixes)
sms9231 collected 12176624 from pot
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 12176624 | Rake 0
Board [ ]
Seat 1: gboro780 (big blind) folded before Flop
Seat 2: TMoney0209 folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 3: Roothlus folded before Flop (didn't bet)
Seat 4: sms9231 (button) showed [ ] and won (12176624) with three of a kind, Sixes
Seat 5: NigDawG (small blind) showed [ ] and lost with two pair, Kings and Sixes


ALTHOUGH, he called, he tanked for a really long time ott.

I would be high fiviing the dealer and wte phrases its cool to use atm.

Hope he can come teach me.

He just doubled back up, wii.

[BorntoBubble]

Such a sick tank. Although if he had folded we probs would never have known what a sicko move it was!

If i was still in that would have been me v him. Im sick at turning trips.

Would love to know how close you folding you were brammer

[EvilPie]

Slowroll.

[George2Loose]

Rub

[PathFinder]

Dont take this the wrong way as i have serious respect for someone who is as successful as NigawG but i dont see how tanking but still making the wrong decision is a great thing???

[Young_gun]

He wasnt tanking, he was multitabling 

[rfgqqabc]

Rub

s

[cambridgealex]

Dont take this the wrong way as i have serious respect for someone who is as successful as NigawG but i dont see how tanking but still making the wrong decision is a great thing???

He didn't make the wrong decision. To even consider folding here is pretty sick.

[pleno1]

no, anybody else SNAPS here, doesnt think for more than 5 seconds, Im sure of that. Tanking for 2 minutes or so is just insane, absolute boss

[PathFinder]

Dont take this the wrong way as i have serious respect for someone who is as successful as NigawG but i dont see how tanking but still making the wrong decision is a great thing???

He didn't make the wrong decision. To even consider folding here is pretty sick.

I think your being a little pedantic with what im saying. Of course it wasnt the "wrong decision" in terms of what you should be doing. But it was the wrong decision in terms of actual result.

[NigDawG]

lol doesn't matter much if i still click the call button

[cambridgealex]

Dont take this the wrong way as i have serious respect for someone who is as successful as NigawG but i dont see how tanking but still making the wrong decision is a great thing???

He didn't make the wrong decision. To even consider folding here is pretty sick.

I think your being a little pedantic with what im saying. Of course it wasnt the "wrong decision" in terms of what you should be doing. But it was the wrong decision in terms of actual result.

Yes but that's actually irrelevant.

[SuuPRlim]

Seat 5: NigDawG (small blind) showed [ ] and lost with two pair, Kings and Sixes

[Tal]

I wouldn't say it's "actually irrelevant"!

Would have been an amazing fold.

At the risk of sounding idiotic...I'm having a bit of difficulty understanding the point of this. There's a basic point about not being results oriented, so we have to call when we should generally call, fold when we should fold, etc.

So, NigDawG made the correct decision in calling (but took longer than most because he was contemplating not doing the right thing?). That wouldn't warrant a thread!

I'm assuming it is more that he made a subjective read but that he calculated a fold isn't right often enough to justify it. That his assessment was closer to the truth in this particular case than his peers' is what has got them cooing.

Is that about right?

Apologies to all, particulalry Mr DawG

[pleno1]

we i must be reading or seeing something different.

i mean i was speechless for at least 5 minutes. wow.