blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 14, 2025, 05:16:56 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262233 Posts in 66603 Topics by 16988 Members
Latest Member: Jengajenga921
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  2013/14 Ashes thread
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 49 Go Down Print
Author Topic: 2013/14 Ashes thread  (Read 86527 times)
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #120 on: July 12, 2013, 12:44:17 PM »

Evens both teams at the moment in the betting

very interesting match

England go favorites if we can set 200+ I reckon
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
gherkin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 129


View Profile
« Reply #121 on: July 12, 2013, 01:01:18 PM »

Evens both teams at the moment in the betting

very interesting match

England go favorites if we can set 200+ I reckon

I was thinking about this, I reckon maybe 230 would be the 50/50 target.  

You can watch for 15 minutes, see the ball do nothing and think 280 would be par with a patient run chase.  Then you see the ball reverse swinging, batsmen struggling to time the ball and not getting value for shots and think it's more like 200.

Great game!

Logged
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1437



View Profile
« Reply #122 on: July 12, 2013, 01:23:04 PM »

I think swanny will be crucial in the 4th innings
Logged
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22503



View Profile
« Reply #123 on: July 12, 2013, 02:40:29 PM »

Think we need Bell to get a 100, gettttttt.
Logged
DungBeetle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4147


View Profile
« Reply #124 on: July 12, 2013, 02:45:42 PM »

I think Aussies will struggle to chase much above 200.

Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #125 on: July 12, 2013, 02:46:39 PM »

Think we need Bell to get a 100, gettttttt.


Doesn't need that many

Aussies can't get 200 on this slow spinning track. Don't think so anyway. Until the new ball, was a real struggle to score
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
mondatoo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22503



View Profile
« Reply #126 on: July 12, 2013, 02:51:49 PM »

Think we need Bell to get a 100, gettttttt.


Doesn't need that many

Aussies can't get 200 on this slow spinning track. Don't think so anyway. Until the new ball, was a real struggle to score

I was thinking 250.

Prior such a loose cannon, could get 50 off 40 balls, or be out next ball, fun to watch though.
Logged
DungBeetle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4147


View Profile
« Reply #127 on: July 12, 2013, 03:03:24 PM »

250 lead England very heavy favs imo.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #128 on: July 12, 2013, 03:05:15 PM »

Right then. One tenth of the way through the Ashes.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
gherkin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 129


View Profile
« Reply #129 on: July 12, 2013, 03:05:29 PM »

Think we need Bell to get a 100, gettttttt.


Doesn't need that many

Aussies can't get 200 on this slow spinning track. Don't think so anyway. Until the new ball, was a real struggle to score

You're more optimistic than me!  England 208-5 and haven't batted brilliantly - could be only 3 down (in 90 overs) if you think Trott wasn't out and Root's decision probably would have been overturned if he referred it.  

Australia have bowled well, seems to have turned into a pitch where both wickets and runs are hard to come by.  Still think a lead of ~230 is par
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« Reply #130 on: July 12, 2013, 05:32:46 PM »

Stuart Broad 
Logged
gherkin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 129


View Profile
« Reply #131 on: July 12, 2013, 05:42:01 PM »

If I was playing for England, having seen the 2 howlers against us yesterday, I'm not walking!  Australia have wasted 3 reviews this innings (they got 1 back because of the Trott shocker) so can't complain.

What comes around goes around, great bit of luck for England!
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15837



View Profile
« Reply #132 on: July 12, 2013, 05:43:23 PM »

If I was playing for England, having seen the 2 howlers against us yesterday, I'm not walking!  Australia have wasted 3 reviews this innings (they got 1 back because of the Trott shocker) so can't complain.

What comes around goes around, great bit of luck for England!

What was the second one mate? Saw the trott one...
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #133 on: July 12, 2013, 05:46:17 PM »

Lovely to see Bell producing when England really need it. Gets a lot of (what my one eye thinks is unmerited) criticism for being a fair weather scorer but this is a steely innings.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
gherkin
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 129


View Profile
« Reply #134 on: July 12, 2013, 05:57:21 PM »

If I was playing for England, having seen the 2 howlers against us yesterday, I'm not walking!  Australia have wasted 3 reviews this innings (they got 1 back because of the Trott shocker) so can't complain.

What comes around goes around, great bit of luck for England!

What was the second one mate? Saw the trott one...

Agar was stumped very early in his innings - it was close, one camera angle was inconclusive but there was another that was conclusive.  Australia went on to score around 150 more after that!



As I mentioned before, even if you don't consider the bails broken there (which to me they are) then he is still not behind the line on the next frame in which they definitely are!

Maybe can't be considered a "shocker" like Trott's as the Umpire obviously decided he couldn't be sure but it's definitely the wrong decision which cost England a lot of runs
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 ... 49 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.074 seconds with 20 queries.