blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
August 12, 2025, 05:04:17 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262839 Posts in 66615 Topics by 16992 Members
Latest Member: Rmf22
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Man botches reshove spot in £50 tournament, rips up equity.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Man botches reshove spot in £50 tournament, rips up equity.  (Read 2443 times)
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #15 on: June 22, 2013, 04:21:09 PM »

yh i think you should fold the shove it's too risky to be all-in with a covering big stack behind you
Logged

tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: June 22, 2013, 04:32:48 PM »


Absolutely LOVE the OP Skippy!


a man who I suspect may not get his entire income from his poker

So good, & beats "he is a lolpro/moron/twat/fish/reta**/mo**" by a country mile.

Post more.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
SubZERO
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 205


FINISH HIM!!!!! Babality


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: June 24, 2013, 10:01:37 PM »

fold pre for sure, opeing 22-66 utg here is a disaster imo - with a load of reshove stacks behind you and hands that play very poorly post flop out of position, I think I agree with 99+ and then AQ+ from UTG range presuming its a full table

as played flatting the shove is the worst option. Shoving seems too spewy, too many chips with a medium strength hand. I'd fold, probably fairly quickly

Logged
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.043 seconds with 20 queries.