blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 22, 2025, 01:53:50 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262365 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  hypothetical wsop spot
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Go Down Print
Author Topic: hypothetical wsop spot  (Read 11967 times)
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #45 on: July 08, 2013, 03:09:55 PM »

Also I think it's safe to assume that no-one is calling off with KK after you've called, only AA will call and there is a 3.5% liklihood of someone at an 8 handed table to be dealt AA in any one hand, its relevant sure, and this would be one of the time that it will concern me most, buts a small figure and shouldn't factor into the obvious decisions  like folding QQ and using the reason that someone might have ACES behind you would be absurd. 88 on the other hand, the risk of running into it is a little more prominent as you have much less equity against the blind all-in.

The main event is a brilliant tournament but it's still poker, I 100% agree you should call a tighter range than the exact same spot first hand of an ept, but not THAT much tighter as folding JJ would be giving away a very easy hugely profitable spot. So what if he has 97 and makes three 9's, its still just a tournament, there will be the same one next year and got very unlucky here, happens.

Logged

Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #46 on: July 08, 2013, 03:12:17 PM »

we would need a super read to call queens or worse. Not worth the risk

what kind of super reads you gonna get on a blind 300 big blind shove?

I'd say there's a 5% chance someone careless enough to open jam UTG on hand one of the main event carelessly exposes their cards.

Wink
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #47 on: July 08, 2013, 03:15:22 PM »

obviously if there are external factors that cause you to be really risk adverse early doors thats different, he question is what would I do - I'd be really happy to call a blind all in UTG vs UTG1 first hand with TT, as I think you make a lot of money (real $) by doing so.

However in wouldn't actually believe they were blind and would fold KK very quickly. unless i knew 100% they hadn't seen - as in i had watched the guy from the first second he got his cards, 98% sure is not enough, and if i was 99% sure I'd rather have AK or AQ i think for a blocckkker. 97% sure or less and I might even just fold blind, no use to even finding AA really.
Logged

titaniumbean
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10018


Equity means nothing.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #48 on: July 08, 2013, 03:16:36 PM »

doesn't help that the tables are 9 and 10 handed alot early in the wsop events. sooo  many players
Logged
wazz
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 614



View Profile
« Reply #49 on: July 08, 2013, 11:17:28 PM »

Oh I didn't see that he was shoving blind.

QQ+ then imo.
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #50 on: July 08, 2013, 11:43:09 PM »

you got 80% with QQ, 77.5% with JJ and 75% with TT 72% with 99

If we're calling QQ, surely we should call 99 as well?
Logged

neverbluff67
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 237



View Profile
« Reply #51 on: July 09, 2013, 12:35:14 AM »

He's not blind right??

Getting in AA only,     

If he's blind, I think you should call wider in relation to how big you consider your edge postflop vs the table


Logged
pleno1
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 18912



View Profile
« Reply #52 on: July 09, 2013, 12:37:28 AM »

He's not blind right??

Getting in AA only,     

If he's blind, I think you should call wider in relation to how big you consider your edge postflop vs the table




It's hypothetical and he is blind.
Logged

Worst playcalling I have ever seen. Bunch of  fucking jokers . Run the bloody ball. 18 rushes all game? You have to be kidding me. Fuck off lol
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #53 on: July 09, 2013, 12:53:38 AM »

He's not blind right??

Getting in AA only,     

If he's blind, I think you should call wider in relation to how big you consider your edge postflop vs the table




you'd need a ridiculously soft table (and be certain it wont be one of the early ones to break) to turn down 75% though surely?
Logged

neverbluff67
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 237



View Profile
« Reply #54 on: July 09, 2013, 01:57:46 AM »

There has be be a cut off somewhere and I think mine would be JJ I'd get in QQ+
Logged
Oxford_HRV
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 644



View Profile
« Reply #55 on: July 09, 2013, 02:52:00 AM »

Personally i'd announce raise, pretending i havent noticed UTG has shoved then proceed to flop nuts with 

but this is so player dependant you could either be ridic balla and re jam ATC HU4rollz

or fold out everything but AA.

all depends on how much you wanna be gtd to play more than just one hand
Logged

To win at poker is to not have to play
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #56 on: July 09, 2013, 09:58:22 AM »

If he's looked I'm folding KK.

If he's generally all-in blind then I don't think I can give up an edge of folding 7's AQ+. I would generally expect people to fold KK behind too so I wouldn't be too worried about that.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
MANTIS01
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6734


What kind of fuckery is this?


View Profile
« Reply #57 on: July 09, 2013, 10:37:07 AM »

I would fold everything except AA and don't give one fuck what the maths says.

Let's say you buy a ticket to the final British Lions test and fly to Australia to watch the game. Somebody outside the ground offers you £5k for it? I don't care how much money I'm theoretically losing I'm still doing the conga through the turnstiles.
Logged

Tikay - "He has a proven track record in business, he is articulate, intelligent, & presents his cases well"

Claw75 - "Mantis is not only a blonde legend he's also very easy on the eye"

Outragous76 - "a really nice certainly intelligent guy"

taximan007 & Girgy85 & Celtic & Laxie - <3 Mantis
lucky_scrote
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3525



View Profile
« Reply #58 on: July 09, 2013, 10:51:01 AM »

To be fair, to the likes of recreational players I can understand folding out most of their hands in this spot when they should be calling because busting first hand is a pretty nut low scenario for them regardless of what edge they are offered. If you are a professional though, you need to do what is appropriate.
Logged

<3 ENSUING
stato_1 said, "banoffee pie i reckon"
stato_1 said, "this is delicious"
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #59 on: July 09, 2013, 01:20:17 PM »

I would fold everything except AA and don't give one fuck what the maths says.

Let's say you buy a ticket to the final British Lions test and fly to Australia to watch the game. Somebody outside the ground offers you £5k for it? I don't care how much money I'm theoretically losing I'm still doing the conga through the turnstiles.

How about if they offer you £5k + a 75% chance you'll get to keep your ticket, and with better seats?
Logged

Pages: 1 2 3 [4] 5 6 7 8 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.095 seconds with 20 queries.