blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 10:35:53 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  Borgata Sues Phil Ivey over Alleged Edge-Sorting Scheme
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Borgata Sues Phil Ivey over Alleged Edge-Sorting Scheme  (Read 2774 times)
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« on: April 12, 2014, 09:16:53 PM »

Once, twice....


On Tuesday, New Jersey’s Borgata Hotel Casino & Spa filed suit against Phil Ivey, a female companion of Ivey’s, and in a separate but related series of allegations, the card manufacturer Gemaco, over $9.626 million won by Ivey at high-stakes baccarat over the course of four separate visits to the Borgata in 2012.

http://www.flushdraw.net/misc/borgata-sues-phil-ivey-companion-card-maker-alleged-edge-sorting-scheme/
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 12, 2014, 11:50:05 PM »

The Borgata, in filing the case, calculated that the game’s initial 1.06% house advantage was shifted to a 6.765% advantage in Ivey’s favor, and that Ivey did not bet the maximum until after a shoe with faulty cards had been pre-sorted, so that the top card in the shoe — favorable or unfavorable — could be determined.

 
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
cambridgealex
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14799


#lovethegame


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: April 13, 2014, 12:03:44 AM »

I'm in the camp that it's dodgy from Ivey but ultimately the casino's fault and they have no case against him, same as crockfords. Does seem ludicrous that this happened after crockfords case was public knowledge!
Logged

Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
edgascoigne
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2144


Newbury Racecourse's Best Dressed Gent. And What?


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: April 13, 2014, 08:44:27 AM »

It's just extraordinary that a casino should have any case at all here.

How many poor souls think they have a 'system' that will enable them to beat the house at various games? Wait until there's been 4 reds in a row and bet black on the wheel of doom. 'Count' cards at blackjack live you've seen in the movies? Only here there's a diff number of decks/auto-shuffler/you can't count properly for toffee. Etc.

Just really grinds my gears that casinos and bookmakers, businesses though they are I will concede, are able to claim extra protection versus punters smarter than the average bear with such stunts.

The only way I see foul play here is if Ivey deliberately corrupted a manufacturing process way back down the line, had a dealer in his pocket, or indeed both. And if he did? Good luck to him I say, the casino's greed has done for them here ffs - this all happened AS the Crockfords news broke!!
Logged

Allez!!
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7126


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 13, 2014, 10:16:01 AM »

I'm in the camp that it's dodgy from Ivey but ultimately the casino's fault and they have no case against him, same as crockfords. Does seem ludicrous that this happened after crockfords case was public knowledge!

Depends on law/regulations in the countries.  In the UK, cheating is described as "interfering in the process of gambling" which is sufficiently vague to cover what Ivey admitted doing.
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10437



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: April 15, 2014, 11:39:00 PM »

Big Casinos+ bookmakers in being huge nits shocker
Logged

dakky
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 509


View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 16, 2014, 02:52:35 AM »

I'm in the camp that it's dodgy from Ivey but ultimately the casino's fault and they have no case against him, same as crockfords. Does seem ludicrous that this happened after crockfords case was public knowledge!

Depends on law/regulations in the countries.  In the UK, cheating is described as "interfering in the process of gambling" which is sufficiently vague to cover what Ivey admitted doing.

If you were to say use a computer/electronic device / communication device to cheat/get an edge at a game is this now a potential criminal charge since 2007 gaming act or not?
Logged
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7126


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 17, 2014, 08:55:25 AM »

I'm in the camp that it's dodgy from Ivey but ultimately the casino's fault and they have no case against him, same as crockfords. Does seem ludicrous that this happened after crockfords case was public knowledge!

Depends on law/regulations in the countries.  In the UK, cheating is described as "interfering in the process of gambling" which is sufficiently vague to cover what Ivey admitted doing.

If you were to say use a computer/electronic device / communication device to cheat/get an edge at a game is this now a potential criminal charge since 2007 gaming act or not?

Because the law is so vague I don't think it isn't really possible to say.  But I think there is a big difference between noticing that the cards are marked and using social engineering to persuade casino employees to manipulate the cards so that they are effectively marked.

Logged
mulhuzz
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3016



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 17, 2014, 06:34:42 PM »

Deece article here by a lawyer here:

http://www.pokernews.com/news/2014/04/sorting-out-the-law-behind-phil-ivey-s-edge-sorting-debacle-18054.htm
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 18, 2014, 12:43:18 PM »

another very good article

http://igaming.org/poker/news/phil-ivey-vs-borgata-weak-spots-inside-the-baccarat-allegations/
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.128 seconds with 19 queries.