on line abuse

[Wardonkey]

Did vinni get hit on the head?

[Scottish Dave]

if its your contention that i used a thesaurus all well and good, but i find your underlying condersention dissparaging. furthermore had i used a thesaurus i would have constucted an assertion with a far greater array of obscure and extravegant synonyms!!!!!!

'it's'
'condescension'
'disparaging'
'extravagant'

Hope this helps. I await your next display of linguistic gymnastics with bated breath.

thanks for your corrections they're REALLY helpful, as it was an on going joke the errors featured in the sbsequent post were intentional; i think only heid got it!
as for the piece its self i am alittle supprised at the extent to which the digressive comments exceeded that of the piece itself;never mind. thanks to those who participated as it was a topical subject for me that i felt was of significant importance. the joke in writing the piece was that i spent longer trying to wake my girlfriend up to type than i did on the piece itself(i'm horribly inept at a key board) The response could have been so different if hadnt drunkenly ushered her straight into the spare tv!!! that was the end of that she was none to pleased.let me furthermore dispell the increasingly prevalent falacy that i'm a ringer. if i wasnt as drunk as i was last night i may have wished i had been in light of the proficiantly articulated derision i recieved.(mickeyt and scottish dave) dont stop digging me out lads i may return to gcse education yet!!! there was a 19th century auther and playwright who was the most appalling speller and his work when written by himself was barely legible, but it was his contention that the content and communication of his work far exceeded something as trivial as grammar. the playwright being oscar wilde was of course correct.I shall continue to formulate the most exasparatingly  poorly constructed pieces when a tad drunk and hope that in such an informal format for communication you all will develop a countenence my interminable but insightful opinions!! I'm eager to know how many of you that were so benevolant in ignominiously correcting my spelling had to consult a dictionary-) i suspect heid as being the only one who didnt (to astute for that time in the morning) lol

right i was honestly fine up till this!

Bolt are you honestly sane??

[Trace]

if its your contention that i used a thesaurus all well and good, but i find your underlying condersention dissparaging. furthermore had i used a thesaurus i would have constucted an assertion with a far greater array of obscure and extravegant synonyms!!!!!!

'it's'
'condescension'
'disparaging'
'extravagant'

Hope this helps. I await your next display of linguistic gymnastics with bated breath.

thanks for your corrections they're REALLY helpful, as it was an on going joke the errors featured in the sbsequent post were intentional; i think only heid got it!
as for the piece its self i am alittle supprised at the extent to which the digressive comments exceeded that of the piece itself;never mind. thanks to those who participated as it was a topical subject for me that i felt was of significant importance. the joke in writing the piece was that i spent longer trying to wake my girlfriend up to type than i did on the piece itself(i'm horribly inept at a key board) The response could have been so different if hadnt drunkenly ushered her straight into the spare tv!!! that was the end of that she was none to pleased.let me furthermore dispell the increasingly prevalent falacy that i'm a ringer. if i wasnt as drunk as i was last night i may have wished i had been in light of the proficiantly articulated derision i recieved.(mickeyt and scottish dave) dont stop digging me out lads i may return to gcse education yet!!! there was a 19th century auther and playwright who was the most appalling speller and his work when written by himself was barely legible, but it was his contention that the content and communication of his work far exceeded something as trivial as grammar. the playwright being oscar wilde was of course correct.I shall continue to formulate the most exasparatingly  poorly constructed pieces when a tad drunk and hope that in such an informal format for communication you all will develop a countenence my interminable but insightful opinions!! I'm eager to know how many of you that were so benevolant in ignominiously correcting my spelling had to consult a dictionary-) i suspect heid as being the only one who didnt (to astute for that time in the morning) lol

Heid - grab yer coat  you've pulled!!!!   

If this is someone messing about I have an idea who it may be!

[Robert HM]

Keep it coming bolt.

[bolt pp]

lol i love it!! am i sane?  when i take my pills......which they force me to do-)

[bolt pp]

I was going to ask if he/she had swallowed a dictionary, until I saw the spelling!!  lol


Must say this thread has cracked me up and put a smile on my face!


Thanks guys.

xx

i'm glad your amused but am eager to find out if you have an opinion about the content of my piece,
i would furthermore like to know what exactly it is that induced you to unequivocal incredulity over the validity of it?

[bolt pp]

Keep it coming bolt.

Its all about the etymology m8, go on the bolt!!!!

[TightEnd]

etymology?

good stuff mate 

Now then, repeat after me:


1. All sentences need to begin with capital letters.

2. I will use full stops, commas and all other appropriate forms of punctuation where necessary.

3. Paragraphs are not just something army types draw in maths lessons.


100 times please, after school

If you follow these three easy rules I can enjoy the etymology of the text in your posts much more! cheers

[Trace]

Keep it coming bolt.

Its all about the etymology m8, go on the bolt!!!!

IT ' S     FFS!!!   sheesh

[thetank]

Why is it that the annonimity that accompanies playing online induces the most deplorably reprehensible language and abuse from seemingly the preponderance of players.
insults that are nothing short of egreadious and would provoke substantial reaction if done in the bricks and mortar game are insouciantly conveyed at the drop of a hat precipitated by nothing more than a bad beat.a multitude of players are abusing the system thus, with compunction and impunity.
Are poker players inherintly contemptable and just very good at duplicitously fiegning humility and magnanomy in the real world only to asuage there anger and frustration by imparting the most pernicious inviduous insults when they get home and play online.
should there be a code of practice that precludes such behaviour and admonishes the perpertraitors with exclusion or suspension depending on the extent to which they have transgressed it?
the nefarious and cowardly element who i would propose never act thus offline, in fear of reprisal, should be filtered out so that human decency, prevalent decorum,and a propensity for reverence can flourish over individual site profit!

Signed: Baby Kangaroo Tribbianni

[thetank]

thanks for your corrections they're REALLY helpful, as it was an on going joke the errors featured in the sbsequent post were intentional; i think only heid got it!
as for the piece its self i am alittle supprised at the extent to which the digressive comments exceeded that of the piece itself;never mind. thanks to those who participated as it was a topical subject for me that i felt was of significant importance. the joke in writing the piece was that i spent longer trying to wake my girlfriend up to type than i did on the piece itself(i'm horribly inept at a key board) The response could have been so different if hadnt drunkenly ushered her straight into the spare tv!!! that was the end of that she was none to pleased.let me furthermore dispell the increasingly prevalent falacy that i'm a ringer. if i wasnt as drunk as i was last night i may have wished i had been in light of the proficiantly articulated derision i recieved.(mickeyt and scottish dave) dont stop digging me out lads i may return to gcse education yet!!! there was a 19th century auther and playwright who was the most appalling speller and his work when written by himself was barely legible, but it was his contention that the content and communication of his work far exceeded something as trivial as grammar. the playwright being oscar wilde was of course correct.I shall continue to formulate the most exasparatingly  poorly constructed pieces when a tad drunk and hope that in such an informal format for communication you all will develop a countenence my interminable but insightful opinions!! I'm eager to know how many of you that were so benevolant in ignominiously correcting my spelling had to consult a dictionary-) i suspect heid as being the only one who didnt (to astute for that time in the morning) lol

Probably witty, but can't be arsed reading it.

I'll say  just in case it is. 

[bolt pp]

Keep it coming bolt.

Its all about the etymology m8, go on the bolt!!!!

IT ' S     FFS!!!   sheesh

well if you want to be pedantic: IT'S    FFS!!!    sheesh'  is a sentence fragment without the correct punctuation to denote pauses and a conclusion; sheesh is an onomatopoeic phrase not recognised in modern English writing and the word its without a commer is a commenly used adjective used to imply ownership. ty gl

[bolt pp]

etymology?

good stuff mate 

Now then, repeat after me:


1. All sentences need to begin with capital letters.

2. I will use full stops, commas and all other appropriate forms of punctuation where necessary.

3. Paragraphs are not just something army types draw in maths lessons.


100 times please, after school

If you follow these three easy rules I can enjoy the etymology of the text in your posts much more! cheers

i'm trying but everyones picking on me!!! is there no safe place for a person with an amazingly high iQ of 98!!!

[Jinky04]

Circumlocution. No one's a bigger fan of it than myself but 'net forums work better if we're all as concise as possible.

[bolt pp]

Circumlocution. No one's a bigger fan of it than myself but 'net forums work better if we're all as concise as possible.

would you not agree then that in accentuating the content of my post as opposed to concentrating on grammatical proficiancy i have upheld the aforementioned practise of being concise?