Another WSOP 2014 Fantasy League - (PAID entry)

[Marky147]

You've missed me off the sheet, Mere

[MereNovice]

You've missed me off the sheet, Mere

Oops, sorry.

After 13 events, the table looks like this:

Manager   Score
Gazza   21
Killer River    20
kp24   20
NigDawG   20
swinebag22   19
Marky147   18
TheTonyG   **   18
pizzled   18
George2Loose   17
DaveShoelace    17
dino1980   17
Yian   17
Claypole   16
Mark_Porter    **   15
hatthehole   15
Big_D    **   14
Chompy   14
redsimon   14
tikay   11
scotty77   10

Those with "**" after their name are only entered in the £10 pool.


The spreadsheet is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aia1Hxq-NDNWdGhYZEFlTHlabWdVNWNTY2dWa3YxRXc&usp=drive_web#gid=7

[MereNovice]

After 17 events, the table looks like this:

Manager   Score
NigDawG   25
Killer River    24
swinebag22   23
pizzled   23
George2Loose   23
Gazza   22
kp24   22
Claypole   22
Marky147   21
dino1980   21
Yian   20
TheTonyG   **   19
DaveShoelace    19
Big_D    **   19
Mark_Porter    **   18
hatthehole   18
Chompy   16
redsimon   15
tikay   15
scotty77   13

Those with "**" after their name are only entered in the £10 pool.


The spreadsheet is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aia1Hxq-NDNWdGhYZEFlTHlabWdVNWNTY2dWa3YxRXc&usp=drive_web#gid=7

[kp24]

super close and bunched up

[MereNovice]

After 20 events, the table looks like this:

Manager   Score
NigDawG   26
Killer River    25
pizzled   25
kp24   25
George2Loose   25
Gazza   24
swinebag22   23
Claypole   23
dino1980   23
Yian   22
Marky147   21
Big_D    **   21
TheTonyG   **   20
DaveShoelace    20
hatthehole   20
Mark_Porter    **   19
Chompy   16
tikay   16
redsimon   16
scotty77   15

Those with "**" after their name are only entered in the £10 pool.


The spreadsheet is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aia1Hxq-NDNWdGhYZEFlTHlabWdVNWNTY2dWa3YxRXc&usp=drive_web#gid=7

[DaveShoelace]

Maybe next year we can do a draft format where we can't have the same players, because we pretty much have the same team as each other.

That said, a single result could swing it this way, which is fun.

Nice to see ElkY giving those of us who dumped him from our team a bit of a sweat.

[MereNovice]

Maybe next year we can do a draft format where we can't have the same players, because we pretty much have the same team as each other.

That said, a single result could swing it this way, which is fun.

Nice to see ElkY giving those of us who dumped him from our team a bit of a sweat.

I'm always game for introducing new ideas.
I lack the flair and imagination to come up with anything fresh myself but if someone else cab do the "creative" bit then I'm  happy.
I'm not sure how many poker players could reasonably be included in a draft, though. We'd need quite a few if there were a significant number of managers.

I think removing Vanessa Selbst from the available selections would increase the variety in the teams for a start!

[DaveShoelace]

Maybe next year we can do a draft format where we can't have the same players, because we pretty much have the same team as each other.

That said, a single result could swing it this way, which is fun.

Nice to see ElkY giving those of us who dumped him from our team a bit of a sweat.

I'm always game for introducing new ideas.
I lack the flair and imagination to come up with anything fresh myself but if someone else cab do the "creative" bit then I'm  happy.
I'm not sure how many poker players could reasonably be included in a draft, though. We'd need quite a few if there were a significant number of managers.

I think removing Vanessa Selbst from the available selections would increase the variety in the teams for a start!

Actually you might be onto the better idea. Removing say the most popular ten players really opens things up and is no more work for you.

Either way, really appreciate this as always, thanks very much

[MereNovice]

Maybe next year we can do a draft format where we can't have the same players, because we pretty much have the same team as each other.

That said, a single result could swing it this way, which is fun.

Nice to see ElkY giving those of us who dumped him from our team a bit of a sweat.

I'm always game for introducing new ideas.
I lack the flair and imagination to come up with anything fresh myself but if someone else cab do the "creative" bit then I'm  happy.
I'm not sure how many poker players could reasonably be included in a draft, though. We'd need quite a few if there were a significant number of managers.

I think removing Vanessa Selbst from the available selections would increase the variety in the teams for a start!

Actually you might be onto the better idea. Removing say the most popular ten players really opens things up and is no more work for you.

Either way, really appreciate this as always, thanks very much

You're very welcome.

I'll make sure that your ideas are brought to the attention of the "organising committee".

[George2Loose]

Did I get elky back in in time for the horse?

[MereNovice]

Did I get elky back in in time for the horse?

Yes.
You had Elky back for event #19.
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aia1Hxq-NDNWdGhYZEFlTHlabWdVNWNTY2dWa3YxRXc&usp=drive_web#gid=8

The Horse event is event #22.

[MintTrav]

Maybe next year we can do a draft format where we can't have the same players, because we pretty much have the same team as each other.

That said, a single result could swing it this way, which is fun.

Nice to see ElkY giving those of us who dumped him from our team a bit of a sweat.

I'm always game for introducing new ideas.
I lack the flair and imagination to come up with anything fresh myself but if someone else cab do the "creative" bit then I'm  happy.
I'm not sure how many poker players could reasonably be included in a draft, though. We'd need quite a few if there were a significant number of managers.

I think removing Vanessa Selbst from the available selections would increase the variety in the teams for a start!

Actually you might be onto the better idea. Removing say the most popular ten players really opens things up and is no more work for you.

Either way, really appreciate this as always, thanks very much

You're very welcome.

I'll make sure that your ideas are brought to the attention of the "organising committee".

Or you could just leave it open for the entrants to choose anyone they like, which is what we have done in the APAT version. It doesn't really cause extra work and might lead to more entrants - I didn't enter cos a number of the people I wanted to choose weren't on the lists.

[MereNovice]

Maybe next year we can do a draft format where we can't have the same players, because we pretty much have the same team as each other.

That said, a single result could swing it this way, which is fun.

Nice to see ElkY giving those of us who dumped him from our team a bit of a sweat.

I'm always game for introducing new ideas.
I lack the flair and imagination to come up with anything fresh myself but if someone else cab do the "creative" bit then I'm  happy.
I'm not sure how many poker players could reasonably be included in a draft, though. We'd need quite a few if there were a significant number of managers.

I think removing Vanessa Selbst from the available selections would increase the variety in the teams for a start!

Actually you might be onto the better idea. Removing say the most popular ten players really opens things up and is no more work for you.

Either way, really appreciate this as always, thanks very much

You're very welcome.

I'll make sure that your ideas are brought to the attention of the "organising committee".

Or you could just leave it open for the entrants to choose anyone they like, which is what we have done in the APAT version. It doesn't really cause extra work and might lead to more entrants - I didn't enter cos a number of the people I wanted to choose weren't on the lists.

There are two wildcard selections for people to "express themselves".

My personal feeling is that it might lead to less entries as people who don't follow poker avidly would feel overwhelmed at having to select a "good" team without assistance.

I'm sorry to hear that you didn't feel able to enter, though.

[George2Loose]

I think the format is perfect to encourage maximum participants

[MereNovice]

After 23 events, the table looks like this:

Manager   Score
Claypole   29
Gazza   28
George2Loose   28
NigDawG   27
Killer River    27
pizzled   27
kp24   27
dino1980   24
Yian   24
swinebag22   23
Big_D    **   22
tikay   22
TheTonyG   **   21
Mark_Porter    **   21
Marky147   21
DaveShoelace    21
hatthehole   21
Chompy   16
redsimon   16
scotty77   16

Those with "**" after their name are only entered in the £10 pool.


The spreadsheet is here:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0Aia1Hxq-NDNWdGhYZEFlTHlabWdVNWNTY2dWa3YxRXc&usp=drive_web#gid=7