2 from bubble

[pleno1]

PokerStars Hand #116661333000: Tournament #910932679, $69+$6 USD Hold'em No Limit - Level XVI (350/700) - 2014/05/25 18:50:12 CET [2014/05/25 12:50:12 ET]
Table '910932679 8' 9-max Seat #6 is the button
Seat 1: TiltMeHarder (4733 in chips)
Seat 2: diamanto13 (50303 in chips)
Seat 5: uWannaLoan? (25394 in chips)
Seat 6: Päffchen (12428 in chips)
Seat 7: danger0us (15262 in chips)
Seat 8: pads1161 (46867 in chips)
Seat 9: RomeOpro (10653 in chips)
TiltMeHarder: posts the ante 85
diamanto13: posts the ante 85
uWannaLoan?: posts the ante 85
Päffchen: posts the ante 85
danger0us: posts the ante 85
pads1161: posts the ante 85
RomeOpro: posts the ante 85
danger0us: posts small blind 350
pads1161: posts big blind 700
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to pads1161 [range/]
RomeOpro: folds
TiltMeHarder: raises 3948 to 4648 and is all-in
diamanto13: folds
uWannaLoan?: folds
Päffchen: folds
danger0us: raises 10529 to 15177 and is all-in
pads1161:


i opening/3betting every hand, 2 from moey. my first bb sicne being big stack

both regs,

[theprawnidentity]

66+,ATs+,AJo+

[Flash92]

I'm probably calling 88+, AJs+, AQo+

But Tomsom always has good maths/equity calcs in these situations so I'm prolly gunna be using his range from now on

Are 6's really a call?

Ash

[mulhuzz]

66+,ATs+,AJo+

Really calling ATs but not KQs? Why so?

[Tal]

KQ+ AJ+ 88+

At the risk of stating the obvious, are we all that keen to get involved? Should we be looking for reasons to call or recognising the reshove is 0% light and narrowing our range a bit, to factor in the situation?

[EvilPie]

These ranges look ridiculously wide to me.

Unless it's a turbo and we're in a rush to get the chips I'd be really tight.

Probably going with AQ and 1010

Not overly happy with the AQ but can't fold it. KQ easy fold as is AJ. 99 I might have to flick it in if I was feeling lucky or my name was pads1161.

[Tal]

These ranges look ridiculously wide to me.

Unless it's a turbo and we're in a rush to get the chips I'd be really tight.

Probably going with AQ and 1010

Not overly happy with the AQ but can't fold it. KQ easy fold as is AJ. 99 I might have to flick it in if I was feeling lucky or my name was pads1161.

It's Pleno...on a Sunday...

[willrobrobu]

yeh id be looking sl tighter too

[MC]

How wide do we think shorty is here on the bubble? How many players left/paid?

If their ranges were both on the wider side I think AT, 55, A9s could be considered

General line would be 66+, AJ+, ATs+

[EvilPie]

Hmmmm......

I'd not noticed that re-shover is SB. That obviously widens his range a bit. Still can't bring myself to go as low as 66 though, probs go as far as 88 and also add in AJ.

It's certainly not going to be a surprise to see him turn up here with 55+ and maybe KJs, KQ+ but I'd still want to err on the side of caution.

[Junior Senior]

You really wanna burn 15k? I think we should be tight here 1010+ AQs+
Happy to keep bubble going and keep opening and three betting loose opens

[wazz]

Think I'm TT+/AKo

[MC]

I'm not intending to be rude, but if I saw anyone folding nines here I'd be like...

Click to see full-size image.

[wazz]

Oh i misread the hh, thought the original raiser had a stack left. 88+ATs+AJo+ unsure about KQs

[theprawnidentity]

77/66 > KQs in multiway all ins according to nash.  Forgetting ICM for a second and just looking at cEV, 66 would net 1826 chips and KQs 599.

So we have significantly more equity.  Even 55 has more equity netting 1003 chips.