What I think is an extremely complex decision

[Sulphur man]

Assuming you are playing a high volume of games then taking these small edges will certainly be beneficial to the ROI
unless they are fundamentally flawed, say for example this is an icm spot then the play may not be worth taking.
 
Would also assume that these 5%'s over the course of time would all add up. It's fine to say that our ROI is set
and under the circumstances the edge of making this play is to but it will be under a constant flux with stack sizes
and the kind of opponents in the pot, payouts, tournament m etc.

What I'm basically saying is that this is contextual to each hand and poker is about finding way's we can have small edges
on a hand by hand basis.

Really thought provoking question. And yeah Cake basically.

[pleno1]

http://www.runitonce.com/mtt/theory-variance-vs-style/

Kind f related. Great read.

[rfgqqabc]

http://www.runitonce.com/mtt/theory-variance-vs-style/

Kind f related. Great read.

Agree a lot with Galfond in the first post, the looser o8 guys tend to have better results. Thinking of a guy like OhRaiseyDaisy who plays the 215s and seems to crush. Guys like UhhhMe too. The problem is sometimes they can go too far in places like icmless/anteless full ring omaha games its just right to be tight.