Well played The Sun

[Woodsey]

Totally missed this story, Good wind up lads letting the PC tossers think they had scored a victory and then sticking 2 fingers up to them 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30928544

Wait.....you're saying you don't like political correctness?

Pretty shite..

[The Camel]

Totally missed this story, Good wind up lads letting the PC tossers think they had scored a victory and then sticking 2 fingers up to them 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30928544

Wait.....you're saying you don't like political correctness?

Pretty shite..

Which part do you disagree with?

Because Page 3 belonged in the days of the 1970s Stewart Lee is talking about. When racism, homophobia and sexism was seen as acceptable.

It objectifies and belittles women and there is no place for it in 2015 UK.

[DaveShoelace]

I'm anticipating this thread is about to turn into quite a heated and polorising debate, so to lighten the upcoming mood, check out this funny dog:

Click to see full-size image.

[Woodsey]

Totally missed this story, Good wind up lads letting the PC tossers think they had scored a victory and then sticking 2 fingers up to them 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30928544

Wait.....you're saying you don't like political correctness?

Pretty shite..

Which part do you disagree with?

Because Page 3 belonged in the days of the 1970s Stewart Lee is talking about. When racism, homophobia and sexism was seen as acceptable.

It objectifies and belittles women and there is no place for it in 2015 UK.

I don't particulalry care if the sun keeps page 3 or not mate, market forces should take care of that, if people want to buy it as it is they should be allowed to, equally those that don't like it can choose not to buy it.

Racism, homophobia and sexism are all wrong, it's just where the line is drawn. The thing is there is no official line despite what some people will try and argue, your line is different to mine and that is only defined by our difference of opinions, in reality the whole thing is just a massive grey area. Liberals want to jump on any minor skirmish of the line they have drawn, less liberal minded people just see that as ultra nit picking and being too PC.

That pretty much it mate, I don't expect either of us to change our opinions, and we are all allowed different opinions right? Yours is not better than mine and vice versa, but it's easy to get into arguments about it because we both feel very strongly our opinion is the right one.

[George2Loose]

If market forces allowed it would it be ok to post child pornography?

[Woodsey]

If market forces allowed it would it be ok to post child pornography?

No, but your going to extremes now. Page 3 is still in the grey area for now.

[George2Loose]

If market forces allowed it would it be ok to post child pornography?

No, but your getting to extremes now. Page 3 is still in the grey area for now.

Extremes? Political correctness gone mad

[EvilPie]

It objectifies and belittles women and there is no place for it in 2015 UK.

What a crock of shit!!

How's that for polarisation?

[The Camel]

Totally missed this story, Good wind up lads letting the PC tossers think they had scored a victory and then sticking 2 fingers up to them 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30928544

Wait.....you're saying you don't like political correctness?

Pretty shite..

Which part do you disagree with?

Because Page 3 belonged in the days of the 1970s Stewart Lee is talking about. When racism, homophobia and sexism was seen as acceptable.

It objectifies and belittles women and there is no place for it in 2015 UK.

I don't particulalry care if the sun keeps page 3 or not mate, market forces should take care of that, if people want to buy it as it is they should be allowed to, equally those that don't like it can choose not to buy it.

Racism, homophobia and sexism are all wrong, it's just where the line is drawn. The thing is there is no official line despite what some people will try and argue, your line is different to mine and that is only defined by our difference of opinions, in reality the whole thing is just a massive grey area. Liberals want to jump on any minor skirmish of the line they have drawn, less liberal minded people just see that as ultra nit picking and being too PC.

That pretty much it mate, I don't expect either of us to change our opinions, and we are all allowed different opinions right? Yours is not better than mine and vice versa, but it's easy to get into arguments about it because we both feel very strongly our opinion is the right one.

That's all fair enough.

But I'm genuinely interested to know what part of that Steward Lee clip you think is "shite" and why.

[Woodsey]

If market forces allowed it would it be ok to post child pornography?

No, but your getting to extremes now. Page 3 is still in the grey area for now.

Extremes? Political correctness gone mad

Not even close, not a very good example.

[Woodsey]

Totally missed this story, Good wind up lads letting the PC tossers think they had scored a victory and then sticking 2 fingers up to them 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30928544

Wait.....you're saying you don't like political correctness?

Pretty shite..

Which part do you disagree with?

Because Page 3 belonged in the days of the 1970s Stewart Lee is talking about. When racism, homophobia and sexism was seen as acceptable.

It objectifies and belittles women and there is no place for it in 2015 UK.

I don't particulalry care if the sun keeps page 3 or not mate, market forces should take care of that, if people want to buy it as it is they should be allowed to, equally those that don't like it can choose not to buy it.

Racism, homophobia and sexism are all wrong, it's just where the line is drawn. The thing is there is no official line despite what some people will try and argue, your line is different to mine and that is only defined by our difference of opinions, in reality the whole thing is just a massive grey area. Liberals want to jump on any minor skirmish of the line they have drawn, less liberal minded people just see that as ultra nit picking and being too PC.

That pretty much it mate, I don't expect either of us to change our opinions, and we are all allowed different opinions right? Yours is not better than mine and vice versa, but it's easy to get into arguments about it because we both feel very strongly our opinion is the right one.

That's all fair enough.

But I'm genuinely interested to know what part of that Steward Lee clip you think is "shite" and why.

I was being facetious because red dog wrote excellent, I didn't even listen to it if I'm honest mate.

[George2Loose]

If market forces allowed it would it be ok to post child pornography?

No, but your getting to extremes now. Page 3 is still in the grey area for now.

Extremes? Political correctness gone mad

Not even close, not a very good example.

It's all point of views tho. One person may think it's a good example, another may think it's bad. Grey area kinda thing

[taximan007]

Totally missed this story, Good wind up lads letting the PC tossers think they had scored a victory and then sticking 2 fingers up to them 

I thought they were just bringing back girls with their knockers out, but if they're now sticking 2 fingers up them then I think that's a bit far for a newspaper - keep that kind of stuff to specialist magazines.

Andrew T wins again 😄

[Woodsey]

If market forces allowed it would it be ok to post child pornography?

No, but your getting to extremes now. Page 3 is still in the grey area for now.

Extremes? Political correctness gone mad

Not even close, not a very good example.

It's all point of views tho. One person may think it's a good example, another may think it's bad. Grey area kinda thing

Come on mate be fair, child pornography is illegal, at least if you said something like showing fully naked women with their bits out that would be legal and probably be within someone's grey area.

[RED-DOG]

Totally missed this story, Good wind up lads letting the PC tossers think they had scored a victory and then sticking 2 fingers up to them 

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30928544

Wait.....you're saying you don't like political correctness?

Pretty shite..

Which part do you disagree with?

Because Page 3 belonged in the days of the 1970s Stewart Lee is talking about. When racism, homophobia and sexism was seen as acceptable.

It objectifies and belittles women and there is no place for it in 2015 UK.

I don't particulalry care if the sun keeps page 3 or not mate, market forces should take care of that, if people want to buy it as it is they should be allowed to, equally those that don't like it can choose not to buy it.

Racism, homophobia and sexism are all wrong, it's just where the line is drawn. The thing is there is no official line despite what some people will try and argue, your line is different to mine and that is only defined by our difference of opinions, in reality the whole thing is just a massive grey area. Liberals want to jump on any minor skirmish of the line they have drawn, less liberal minded people just see that as ultra nit picking and being too PC.

That pretty much it mate, I don't expect either of us to change our opinions, and we are all allowed different opinions right? Yours is not better than mine and vice versa, but it's easy to get into arguments about it because we both feel very strongly our opinion is the right one.

That's all fair enough.

But I'm genuinely interested to know what part of that Steward Lee clip you think is "shite" and why.

I was being facetious because red dog wrote excellent, I didn't even listen to it if I'm honest mate.

So you disagree with me before you know what I'm referring to? Fair enough.

FWIW I have absolutely no problem with page 3. I don't think anyone is being exploited. I do however disagree with adding the word 'tossers' every time you say PC.

It isn't always a bad thing.