blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 09, 2025, 01:35:04 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262130 Posts in 66599 Topics by 16765 Members
Latest Member: Jengajenga921
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  More mafs.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: More mafs.  (Read 2838 times)
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« on: April 02, 2015, 05:23:58 PM »

If a bucket has a 4mm hole in the bottom allowing water to leak out at a rate of 1 pint a minute, does that mean that a 8mm hole will allow water to leak out at 2 pints a minute?

My gut feeling is no, it will leak out faster, but I don't really understand why.

If I'm right and it is faster, how would we calculate how big the hole should be for 2 pints per minute?

Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24288


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 02, 2015, 05:26:32 PM »

4mm being what? The radius, diameter, circumference or 4mm2 being the area of the hole?
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 02, 2015, 05:30:19 PM »

4mm being what? The radius, diameter, circumference or 4mm2 being the area of the hole?

Sorry, obv missing relevant info.

Diameter.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 02, 2015, 05:30:23 PM »

4mm and 8mm being the diameter of the hole?  If that's the case, then the 8mm hole will let more than double the amount of water out per minute as the area of the hole is what's important.

The area is πr2.

4mm diameter gives a r=2mm

3.14 x 22 = 12.56mm2

8mm diameter gives a r=4mm

3.14 x 42 = 50.24mm2

So the water will come out at 4 times the rate.
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
doubleup
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7123


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 02, 2015, 05:32:56 PM »

think this is maybe physics rather than maths?

If you removed the entire bottom of the bucket, the water would fall as fast as possible (can't remember what speed that is).  

Aren't there other forces at play?
Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 02, 2015, 05:33:49 PM »

4mm and 8mm being the diameter of the hole?  If that's the case, then the 8mm hole will let more than double the amount of water out per minute as the area of the hole is what's important.

The area is πr2.

4mm diameter gives a r=2mm

3.14 x 22 = 12.56mm2

8mm diameter gives a r=4mm

3.14 x 42 = 50.24mm2

So the water will come out at 4 times the rate.


OK. I believe you, but I want to understand your answer, so first of all, what does "The area is πr2" mean and how do you know that it's so?
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 44239


We go again.


View Profile WWW
« Reply #6 on: April 02, 2015, 05:35:23 PM »

think this is maybe physics rather than maths?

If you removed the entire bottom of the bucket, the water would fall as fast as possible (can't remember what speed that is). 

Aren't there other forces at play?

I think we were assuming everything else was a constant and that if you have a hole that's twice as big (or two holes the same size instead of one), then the water would flow at twice the rate. Having a hole with twice the diameter is the same as having a hole 4 times as big, or four holes of the same size as the original one.  Therefore the flow rate would be 4x the original?
Logged

'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
david3103
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6089



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2015, 05:36:13 PM »

If 4mm is the diameter which seems likely since Tom would have used a 4mm drill then the area of the hole would be 4pi
To double the flow needs an 8pi hole ( pi x 2 ^2) so the diameter needs to be such that the square of half of it is 8
Sq rt of 8 is approx 2.82 so the hole needa to be 5.64mm ish
Logged

It's more about the winning than the winnings

5 November 2012 - Kinboshi says "Best post ever on blonde thumbs up"
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #8 on: April 02, 2015, 05:36:25 PM »

think this is maybe physics rather than maths?

If you removed the entire bottom of the bucket, the water would fall as fast as possible (can't remember what speed that is).  

Aren't there other forces at play?

Surely not if the bucket was bucket shaped. (i.e. conical)
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
Longines
Gamesmaster
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3795


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 02, 2015, 05:37:29 PM »

http://www.efunda.com/formulae/fluids/draining_tank.cfm#calc

Cliffs: Boshi is right and the rate for a given hole size depends on how deep the water in the bucket is.
Logged
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #10 on: April 02, 2015, 05:39:10 PM »

If 4mm is the diameter which seems likely since Tom would have used a 4mm drill then the area of the hole would be 4pi
To double the flow needs an 8pi hole ( pi x 2 ^2) so the diameter needs to be such that the square of half of it is 8
Sq rt of 8 is approx 2.82 so the hole needa to be 5.64mm ish


See, that's really surprising. I'm very interested in pi holes.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 02, 2015, 05:40:28 PM »

http://www.efunda.com/formulae/fluids/draining_tank.cfm#calc

Cliffs: Boshi is right and the rate for a given hole size depends on how deep the water in the bucket is.


We're assuming a constant flow rate regardless of depth.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #12 on: April 02, 2015, 05:41:52 PM »

If 4mm is the diameter which seems likely since Tom would have used a 4mm drill then the area of the hole would be 4pi
To double the flow needs an 8pi hole ( pi x 2 ^2) so the diameter needs to be such that the square of half of it is 8
Sq rt of 8 is approx 2.82 so the hole needa to be 5.64mm ish


See, that's really surprising. I'm very interested in pi holes.


How do we arrive at the fact that a 5.64mm hole is 8pi?
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #13 on: April 02, 2015, 05:43:15 PM »

And would it be the same if it was metres or kilometers instead of mm?
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
RED-DOG
International Lover World Wide Playboy
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 47368



View Profile WWW
« Reply #14 on: April 02, 2015, 05:44:46 PM »

It must be a bugger when you're packaging ice cream. Twice as much to fill a slightly bigger tub.
Logged

The older I get, the better I was.
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.144 seconds with 19 queries.