poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 23, 2025, 12:54:04 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262378
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
England cricket team
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
...
15
16
17
18
[
19
]
20
21
22
23
...
27
Author
Topic: England cricket team (Read 54135 times)
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #270 on:
July 30, 2015, 10:26:21 PM »
2005 was something of a one-off as a comparator
Such a heightened experience because England were at last competitive again after so long and the sides were pretty well matched.
Some bowling skill levels today are as good as any at any time and so it's not a complete surprise that teams get blown away from time to time.
I've enjoyed cricket for a long time, even when test cricket was just about the dullest thing in the world of sport. On balance, I'd rather watch these abbreviated, fast scoring matches than some of the turgid stuff I watched in the past.
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
horseplayer
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10314
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #271 on:
July 30, 2015, 10:27:04 PM »
Quote from: Tal on July 30, 2015, 10:24:25 PM
Quote from: horseplayer on July 30, 2015, 10:16:38 PM
It didnt look a weak middle order pre the ashes so maybe we should get some credit.
Thought Shane Warne was disgusting today on comms, suggesting Cook had slagged of Clarke regularly (no such evidence) and constantly referring to how Haddin (his best mate) should be playing. Certainly his views give you a great indication as to who he hates, mildly dislikes and loves in the Aussie camp.
Even argued with the Clarke captaincy away stats (that i posted pre series) as being "misleading" (how?!!) and that he is not in bad form. Pointing by contrast was excellent very balanced and able to be critical of people you can tell he respects and possibly even likes.
Has Punter done commentary in Oz before this or have Sky just struck oil? He's a real Gary Neville. Suberb.
I have heard him briefly on the Big Bash stuff before but was not particular taken either way. Obviously more time in the tests, just superb.
Still nothing quite beats Michael Vaughan on TMS late evening he knew the Aussies were "not up for this test" by the body language before the toss on Wednesday morning. Quite how he garnered this i have no idea, i have never heard such an after-timer on any media form.
Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 7809
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #272 on:
July 30, 2015, 10:29:37 PM »
Find McGrath has a really good dry sense of humour on TMS - knowledgeable too izzit
Logged
sola virtus nobilitat
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #273 on:
July 30, 2015, 11:57:53 PM »
Quote from: horseplayer on July 30, 2015, 10:27:04 PM
Quote from: Tal on July 30, 2015, 10:24:25 PM
Quote from: horseplayer on July 30, 2015, 10:16:38 PM
It didnt look a weak middle order pre the ashes so maybe we should get some credit.
Thought Shane Warne was disgusting today on comms, suggesting Cook had slagged of Clarke regularly (no such evidence) and constantly referring to how Haddin (his best mate) should be playing. Certainly his views give you a great indication as to who he hates, mildly dislikes and loves in the Aussie camp.
Even argued with the Clarke captaincy away stats (that i posted pre series) as being "misleading" (how?!!) and that he is not in bad form. Pointing by contrast was excellent very balanced and able to be critical of people you can tell he respects and possibly even likes.
Has Punter done commentary in Oz before this or have Sky just struck oil? He's a real Gary Neville. Suberb.
I have heard him briefly on the Big Bash stuff before but was not particular taken either way. Obviously more time in the tests, just superb.
Still nothing quite beats Michael Vaughan on TMS late evening he knew the Aussies were "not up for this test" by the body language before the toss on Wednesday morning. Quite how he garnered this i have no idea, i have never heard such an after-timer on any media form.
Botham is pretty terrible after timer as well. Vaughan has been a massive disappointment to me post career, he is just a bit of a prat IMO. Was a big fan of his captaincy and his style when batting.
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 15837
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #274 on:
July 31, 2015, 12:09:50 AM »
Quote from: Longy on July 30, 2015, 11:57:53 PM
Quote from: horseplayer on July 30, 2015, 10:27:04 PM
Quote from: Tal on July 30, 2015, 10:24:25 PM
Quote from: horseplayer on July 30, 2015, 10:16:38 PM
It didnt look a weak middle order pre the ashes so maybe we should get some credit.
Thought Shane Warne was disgusting today on comms, suggesting Cook had slagged of Clarke regularly (no such evidence) and constantly referring to how Haddin (his best mate) should be playing. Certainly his views give you a great indication as to who he hates, mildly dislikes and loves in the Aussie camp.
Even argued with the Clarke captaincy away stats (that i posted pre series) as being "misleading" (how?!!) and that he is not in bad form. Pointing by contrast was excellent very balanced and able to be critical of people you can tell he respects and possibly even likes.
Has Punter done commentary in Oz before this or have Sky just struck oil? He's a real Gary Neville. Suberb.
I have heard him briefly on the Big Bash stuff before but was not particular taken either way. Obviously more time in the tests, just superb.
Still nothing quite beats Michael Vaughan on TMS late evening he knew the Aussies were "not up for this test" by the body language before the toss on Wednesday morning. Quite how he garnered this i have no idea, i have never heard such an after-timer on any media form.
Botham is pretty terrible after timer as well. Vaughan has been a massive disappointment to me post career, he is just a bit of a prat IMO. Was a big fan of his captaincy and his style when batting.
Vaughan is just a shameless media whore these days, saying shit just to keep him in the cricketing public eye.
Logged
vegaslover
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4624
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #275 on:
July 31, 2015, 12:11:20 AM »
Quote from: Woodsey on July 30, 2015, 09:35:30 PM
Quote from: vegaslover on July 30, 2015, 09:15:47 PM
Quote from: Woodsey on July 30, 2015, 06:26:36 PM
Quote from: TightEnd on July 30, 2015, 06:24:18 PM
because it is mainly there to eliminate howlers from an umpire, although often not sued like that by teams
in tennis its in or out, with cricket there are a lot of really tight judgement calls an umpire has to make, in tennis if its in and called out its a mistake .
in cricket its there to support the umpire not help the player
Tennis is more black and white as you know where the ball landed. Cricket they are often predicting the trajectory of the ball so a lot more chance of error, so it's a computers best guess basically.
Same for Tennis as cricket. 3mm give for Hawkeye in Tennis.
As Rich and Mark have said, the review system is there to get rid of the howlers, unfortunately too often the reviews are tactical.
Yeah but the ball lands where it's gonna land in tennis, no element of predicting future trajectory unlike cricket.
I know what you saying, but it still not completely accurate in tennis. makers themselves say 3mm leeway. Pretty obv watching Wimbledon this year where there are occasional errors, as clearly evident on the faces of players.
Everyone knows it is not 100% for cricket, but does what it supposed to do and prevents the howlers
Logged
HutchGF
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1097
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #276 on:
July 31, 2015, 10:54:08 AM »
I agree with comments made on Ponting's commentary - he really is very good. I envisaged him being very dry and matter of fact but his tactical nous shines through and for such a fierce on-field competitor he is surprisingly balanced.
I also will admit to enjoying Warney's commentary despite his seemingly endless search for controversy. The banter between him and some of the England lads (Hussein et al) is fun to listen to and adds a bit of spice.
The same bit of spice which seems to be lacking on the field tbh.
Logged
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1437
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #277 on:
July 31, 2015, 11:21:22 AM »
Quote from: nirvana on July 30, 2015, 10:29:37 PM
Find McGrath has a really good dry sense of humour on TMS - knowledgeable too izzit
Mcgrath has been bang on so far, really enjoyed listening to his stints on TMS but i think he is about the only one i do enjoy listening to on there.
Booked the day off graft today so i could have a good weekend watching the cricket. That's went down the shitpan. I was doing a bit raindance at 11.30 on wednesday morning.
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 24288
"He's always at it!"
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #278 on:
July 31, 2015, 01:32:42 PM »
Open with Lyon and get in a second over before lunch?
Logged
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
JohnCharver
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1249
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #279 on:
July 31, 2015, 02:46:28 PM »
bell knows hes got 3 days right lol.
Hope lyth gets out, he needs dropped and think selectors make mistakes based on us winning= no need to change.
Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #280 on:
July 31, 2015, 03:48:18 PM »
Quote from: JohnCharver on July 31, 2015, 02:46:28 PM
bell knows hes got 3 days right lol.
Hope lyth gets out, he needs dropped and think selectors make mistakes based on us winning= no need to change.
Who are you replacing him with?
Logged
JohnCharver
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1249
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #281 on:
July 31, 2015, 04:04:09 PM »
Quote from: Longy on July 31, 2015, 03:48:18 PM
Quote from: JohnCharver on July 31, 2015, 02:46:28 PM
bell knows hes got 3 days right lol.
Hope lyth gets out, he needs dropped and think selectors make mistakes based on us winning= no need to change.
Who are you replacing him with?
Anybody.
Not sure, seen some debate from people who follow the county game and obvious its not an easy solution but might as well roll the dice on someone.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #282 on:
July 31, 2015, 04:07:07 PM »
Quote from: JohnCharver on July 31, 2015, 04:04:09 PM
Quote from: Longy on July 31, 2015, 03:48:18 PM
Quote from: JohnCharver on July 31, 2015, 02:46:28 PM
bell knows hes got 3 days right lol.
Hope lyth gets out, he needs dropped and think selectors make mistakes based on us winning= no need to change.
Who are you replacing him with?
Anybody.
Not sure, seen some debate from people who follow the county game and obvious its not an easy solution but might as well roll the dice on someone.
thats the exact opposite of what England do
better to suggest things that are realistic.
there is no easy ready made solution, hence the difficulty and why he might stay.
i would pick compton, but england won't.
Logged
My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
JohnCharver
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1249
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #283 on:
July 31, 2015, 04:24:36 PM »
Quote from: TightEnd on July 31, 2015, 04:07:07 PM
Quote from: JohnCharver on July 31, 2015, 04:04:09 PM
Quote from: Longy on July 31, 2015, 03:48:18 PM
Quote from: JohnCharver on July 31, 2015, 02:46:28 PM
bell knows hes got 3 days right lol.
Hope lyth gets out, he needs dropped and think selectors make mistakes based on us winning= no need to change.
Who are you replacing him with?
Anybody.
Not sure, seen some debate from people who follow the county game and obvious its not an easy solution but might as well roll the dice on someone.
thats the exact opposite of what England do
better to suggest things that are realistic.
there is no easy ready made solution, hence the difficulty and why he might stay.
i would pick compton, but england won't.
Stoneman, geordies have great records in ashes adversity.
Logged
swinebag22
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 589
Re: England cricket team
«
Reply #284 on:
July 31, 2015, 04:39:16 PM »
Tough one with the opener role. Opening the batting is very tough. Just shows how great Cook has done. The possible (already tried) contenders to replace Lyth for me are (in no order)
Carberry
Robson
Compton
who have all had a dip with minimal success and have all been treated fairly harshly. Can't think of anyone untried who could step in here.
The best thing the selectors could do would be to put an arm round Lyth, tell him he is the future and will be opening for the final 2 tests. Having said that, his confidence does seem shattered and he has looked outclassed.
A left field option for me would be promoting Moin Ali to opener and given Rashid a run out at 8. Trouble is, England won't really need a second spinner at Trent bridge so this is lefter than left field
Logged
Pages:
1
...
15
16
17
18
[
19
]
20
21
22
23
...
27
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...