blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 10:05:21 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  The worst Premier League. Ever?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: The worst Premier League. Ever?  (Read 5977 times)
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« on: September 16, 2015, 10:35:44 AM »

been meaning to write this for weeks


Manchester city spend fortunes and are already 1/3 shots to win the title

Arsenal are inconsistent, and have real issues spending money to strengthen what they have from who is available

Man U rebuilding

Liverpool permanently rebuilding..sell suarez, spend  sell sterling, spend. spend badly, it might be said

Chelsea trouble behind the scenes?

that leaves space for the likes of Palace, Swansea etc to fill into the top 6 perhaps temporarily

at the other end there are bad teams

sunderland, newcastle, villa, west brom, three promoted teams grappling to adapt..jury out on stoke


performance in europe has been bad for 3 years, and the co-efficient that gets us 4 teams in the champions league must be in trouble


is this cyclical, an accident of so many teams with issues in the short term only?

or is it structural? overpaying average talent, a transfer of wealth from tv deals to players that means they have little incentive to perform?
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
DungBeetle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4147


View Profile
« Reply #1 on: September 16, 2015, 11:00:16 AM »

Surely it is cyclical.  The money available surely means they can't fail to assemble the best talent in the medium term.  I think last season was just as poor apart from Man City were in Chelsea's spot.  Personally I think Watford/Bournemouth/Norwich will add more than Hull/QPR/Burnley did.

What is embarrassing is the continual failure in Europe.   To be honest though, I'm not really fussed if we go from 4 to 3 teams in Champ League and one of the big boys has to miss out.
Logged
The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17074


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: September 16, 2015, 04:13:25 PM »

Surely it is cyclical.  The money available surely means they can't fail to assemble the best talent in the medium term.  I think last season was just as poor apart from Man City were in Chelsea's spot.  Personally I think Watford/Bournemouth/Norwich will add more than Hull/QPR/Burnley did.

What is embarrassing is the continual failure in Europe.   To be honest though, I'm not really fussed if we go from 4 to 3 teams in Champ League and one of the big boys has to miss out.

I think this will be good for English football.

Too much complacency at some clubs.
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
The Camel
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 17074


Under my tree, being a troll.


View Profile
« Reply #3 on: September 16, 2015, 04:16:20 PM »

been meaning to write this for weeks


Manchester city spend fortunes and are already 1/3 shots to win the title

Arsenal are inconsistent, and have real issues spending money to strengthen what they have from who is available

Man U rebuilding

Liverpool permanently rebuilding..sell suarez, spend  sell sterling, spend. spend badly, it might be said

Chelsea trouble behind the scenes?

that leaves space for the likes of Palace, Swansea etc to fill into the top 6 perhaps temporarily

at the other end there are bad teams

sunderland, newcastle, villa, west brom, three promoted teams grappling to adapt..jury out on stoke


performance in europe has been bad for 3 years, and the co-efficient that gets us 4 teams in the champions league must be in trouble


is this cyclical, an accident of so many teams with issues in the short term only?

or is it structural? overpaying average talent, a transfer of wealth from tv deals to players that means they have little incentive to perform?

It was only one game (sample size etc) and Aguero wasn't playing, but FML City were poor last night. And Juve should be significantly weaker this season than last.

It's telling that many of the best players in this country are cast offs from Real and Barca.
Logged

Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists

"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012

"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
Archer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1050


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: September 16, 2015, 05:44:49 PM »

been meaning to write this for weeks


Manchester city spend fortunes and are already 1/3 shots to win the title

Arsenal are inconsistent, and have real issues spending money to strengthen what they have from who is available

Man U rebuilding

Liverpool permanently rebuilding..sell suarez, spend  sell sterling, spend. spend badly, it might be said

Chelsea trouble behind the scenes?

that leaves space for the likes of Palace, Swansea etc to fill into the top 6 perhaps temporarily

at the other end there are bad teams

sunderland, newcastle, villa, west brom, three promoted teams grappling to adapt..jury out on stoke


performance in europe has been bad for 3 years, and the co-efficient that gets us 4 teams in the champions league must be in trouble


is this cyclical, an accident of so many teams with issues in the short term only?

or is it structural? overpaying average talent, a transfer of wealth from tv deals to players that means they have little incentive to perform?


City are stronger now than than at any point in the last 5 years including their 2 title winning years. Despite last night, I'd would say it is an inevitability that they will bridge the gap in the next few years to the Big 3 of Barcelona, Real Madrid and Bayern.

Arsenal likewise IMO are stronger than they were 5 years ago.

Chelsea were the real deal just over a month ago before  the season started.

United  post Ferguson have not been great. I'd say it is inevitable they will become a major force again when the rebuild is complete. The problem now of course is they have been so dull - before the Liverpool game at the weekend they had only scored 6 times in their last 10 league games. That is unheard of for United and whilst personally I'm enjoying their struggles it is not what we are used to or good for the Premier League.

Liverpool/Spurs. Hmmm.

Looking at the teams City have played this year, we have had big battles with Everton and Palace, both very imprssive  and, to a lesser extent,  Watford.  Comfortable wins only against WBA (very poor) and Chelsea. Of the games I've seen on TV not involving City  I've also been very impressed with Swansea and, just for you, Leicester!


Sure, recent performance in Europe has not been the best. I don't think this is due to a lack of quality and it strikes me we play a completely different game. Using a poker analogy, the Premier  League 90 minutes is like a "super turbo" and many European games are "slow structures".

The risk of losing the 4th spot to Italy is real. Ironically, this is due more to poor performance by English teams in the Europa League than the Champions League.
Logged
DungBeetle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4147


View Profile
« Reply #5 on: September 16, 2015, 09:20:44 PM »

Arsenal hitting a new low for the English clubs this week.  Total lack of application so far and poor discipline against the group minnow.  Wenger will deflect by blaming the ref I imagine.
« Last Edit: September 16, 2015, 09:26:09 PM by DungBeetle » Logged
Ant040689
Probation
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 0



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: September 17, 2015, 03:07:50 PM »

The Prem is missing the big name players that it once had as well imo. Namely, Suarez, Bale and Ronaldo of recent times. The types of players that you would watch a game just because you knew they were not too far away from doing something special. Not sure I can name one with a similar feel now, maybe Silva? It is a shame Hazard has started slowly.
Logged
Ironside
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 41931



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: September 17, 2015, 03:11:15 PM »

Aguero?
Logged

I am the master of my fate
I am the captain of my soul.
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1437



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: September 17, 2015, 03:25:49 PM »

Aguero?

Normally i'd say yes, but he's looked awful the start of this season. When i say awful, i mean not match fit.
Logged
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7809



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: September 17, 2015, 03:45:27 PM »

Not so bothered about individuals - just hard to find a team playing at anything like the tempo and cohesion of the best European sides. City on their day, Arsenal sporadically
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1437



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: September 17, 2015, 04:51:41 PM »

Think Premier League teams are about 4 times behind the rest of Europe. A winning style now seems to be defend really well and be shit hot on the counter attack. Bayern Munich began this trend when they were dominating Europe, Robben and Ribery with blistering pace on the attack. Real Madrid then carried this on with Ronaldo being the main man, bags of pace and an engine that can go for days.

Barcelona had to change their tactics. The whole "Tika taka" was no longer working. So this went with a top 3 with blistering pace and lightening movement in Saurez Neymar and Messi. And they're back to winning everything.

Now it seems the premier league big boys are all trying to play their on version of "tika taka" which works in the premier league because the defences arn't as good as other European sides. When they come up against the big boys of Europe they have no chance.

Even teams in the premier league who are having success play this counter attacking football. Namely Leicester and West Ham.
Logged
exstream
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2508


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: September 17, 2015, 05:28:55 PM »

Think Premier League teams are about 4 times behind the rest of Europe. A winning style now seems to be defend really well and be shit hot on the counter attack. Bayern Munich began this trend when they were dominating Europe, Robben and Ribery with blistering pace on the attack. Real Madrid then carried this on with Ronaldo being the main man, bags of pace and an engine that can go for days.

Barcelona had to change their tactics. The whole "Tika taka" was no longer working. So this went with a top 3 with blistering pace and lightening movement in Saurez Neymar and Messi. And they're back to winning everything.

Now it seems the premier league big boys are all trying to play their on version of "tika taka" which works in the premier league because the defences arn't as good as other European sides. When they come up against the big boys of Europe they have no chance.

Even teams in the premier league who are having success play this counter attacking football. Namely Leicester and West Ham.

4 times behind? I'd say either 3 or 4 mate.
Logged
aaron1867
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3386



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: September 17, 2015, 05:37:09 PM »

Do you not think that the new Tv deal for next season has got anything to do with it? Perhaps the top teams are focusing on next season and the the reality in rebuilding during this season in terms of compeiting in the CL, then have a more valid attempt next season with the more money?

But is it really worst PL ever? Away from the top 6, the league looks really competitive.
Logged
DungBeetle
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4147


View Profile
« Reply #13 on: September 17, 2015, 05:43:30 PM »

Not sure about that.  Man City have spent £100 million on two players.  Man Utd have spent absolute fortunes under Van Gaal and barely improved.  Ditto Liverpool who have gone backwards.

I don't think they are biding their time. (apart from old Arsene of course and possibly Spurs due to the new stadium)
Logged
arbboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 13270


View Profile
« Reply #14 on: September 17, 2015, 05:46:54 PM »

I think people forget this 'record' EPL tv deal is equally balanced between all 20 clubs (barring additional payments for each game shown - these are marginal compared to the flat fee lump all 20 teams get).  This is what is making the middle 10 clubs so much more competitive as they have real buying power to attract champions league players wages wise who they would never have been able to attract in the past.  Palace/Stoke/Newcastle signings this summer are all evidence of this.

In turn this doesn't make the top teams relatively more competitive against the Spanish giants.  The big two in Spain mop up virtually all the tv money under their tv deal.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.103 seconds with 20 queries.