blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 28, 2024, 06:33:28 AM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272608 Posts in 66755 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
| | |-+  England in South Africa
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 ... 22 Go Down Print
Author Topic: England in South Africa  (Read 33790 times)
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7804



View Profile
« Reply #150 on: December 29, 2015, 06:52:59 PM »

Finn takes wickets and key ones at that

kind of essential that

really good again today should be fine tomorrow


Was just pulling Mr verns leg. Been watching finn since he was 13. Genuine test bowler and love seeing him do so well
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
horseplayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10601



View Profile
« Reply #151 on: December 30, 2015, 08:51:04 AM »

Magic moen
Logged
horseplayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10601



View Profile
« Reply #152 on: December 30, 2015, 10:38:12 AM »

The Indian series was not just the pitch

Skittled out for 170 on a flattening pitch is embarrassing a captain who does not want to be a captain.

Already announced a 13 man squad for both the tests

Well done lads great performance especially first morning at 50/3
Logged
horseplayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10601



View Profile
« Reply #153 on: December 30, 2015, 10:47:53 AM »

South African selectors gone above amla and added two players to the squad
Logged
muckthenuts
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1693


View Profile
« Reply #154 on: December 30, 2015, 01:49:16 PM »

Great game. Probably 0% chance of dropping Stokes for the next test i imagine, but i really feel strongly about him being a passenger in this side.
Logged
buzzharvey22
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1443



View Profile
« Reply #155 on: December 30, 2015, 01:52:47 PM »

Great game. Probably 0% chance of dropping Stokes for the next test i imagine, but i really feel strongly about him being a passenger in this side.

I completely agree. I think Woakes is a better bowler and there's probably not much difference between their batting at the moment.
Logged
TightEnd
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #156 on: December 30, 2015, 02:01:06 PM »

but Stokes can change a game when he comes off with the bat its dramatic, quick runs scoring heavily

he is also great with the old ball at reverse swing. saw that in the west indies and the Ashes. takes wickets in clusters too

Absolutely should not be dropped, he lengthens the batting line up a lot and provides the fifth bowler

Anderson will be back in for Woakes as long as Finn can play back to back test matches at the moment
Logged

My eyes are open wide
By the way,I made it through the day
I watch the world outside
By the way, I'm leaving out today
horseplayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10601



View Profile
« Reply #157 on: December 30, 2015, 02:10:26 PM »

Stokes is 24

His record for an all rounder of that age is good/very good

Mad to drop him

Really impressed with woakes looks 5mph quicker this tour would not mind unchanged myself
Logged
muckthenuts
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1693


View Profile
« Reply #158 on: December 30, 2015, 03:30:53 PM »

but Stokes can change a game when he comes off with the bat its dramatic, quick runs scoring heavily

he is also great with the old ball at reverse swing. saw that in the west indies and the Ashes. takes wickets in clusters too

Absolutely should not be dropped, he lengthens the batting line up a lot and provides the fifth bowler

Anderson will be back in for Woakes as long as Finn can play back to back test matches at the moment

If you could choose it's much more preferable to have someone who could potentially bat out a whole day over someone who could score quick runs in a test match. Stokes will rarely score a hundred or take a 5 for. That's what changes a game much more often than 40 off 50 balls. His average of 27.72 over a good 36 innings is not number 6 standard.  

With regards to his bowling his stats speak for themselves: 46 wickets at 40.67 at test level. Even at FC level he's only averaging 30.56. Not good enough.

I mean i'm not saying he's totally worthless - but the problem is that you have Moeen with very similar limitations who is also in the side. There shouldn't be any room for both in one team. I would rather have a batting number 6 all day over Stokes and only pick him on the odd occasion a pitch warrants 4 seamers. He may become a decent ODI player, but never any more than a jack of all trades at test level.

Logged
horseplayer
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 10601



View Profile
« Reply #159 on: December 30, 2015, 03:57:26 PM »

Only England

Just hammered the number one test side and side still not good enough

Moen just the 7 wickets again just lucky again I guess
Logged
Tal
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 24352


"He's always at it!"


View Profile
« Reply #160 on: December 30, 2015, 04:50:57 PM »

Only England

Just hammered the number one test side and side still not good enough

Moen just the 7 wickets again just lucky again I guess

That's another thing. We're fifth in the rankings. South Africa first but without a 100 partnership all year. Lost two greats to boot. If they lose the series, they could finish up fourth. Silly system.
Logged

"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7804



View Profile
« Reply #161 on: December 30, 2015, 05:04:01 PM »

Tend to agree there's not a lot between Stokes and Woakes at the moment but Woakes hasn't shown himself capable of being better by a distance so good to stick with Stokes for the medium term. Occasionally games may play out such that you could swap Stokes and Bairstow in the order but it's not very broken at the moment.

Moeen - can't believe anyone still questions his ability. Front line spinner and batting where he does is just great for this team at the moment.

Obviously a bit early in his test career but when this team/squad was picked the only person I felt had a lot to prove was Hales - the other newer (re) inclusions like Taylor/Bairstow/Compton just obviously have it whatever happens to them temporarily
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
fatcatstu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 744


View Profile
« Reply #162 on: December 30, 2015, 05:23:22 PM »

Woakes is the very definition of bog standard.

Stokes has taken vital wickets at times when the team has needed a break through, can change the impetus of an innings with the bat and is probably the best fielder in the team!

Woakes has to be the one to be dropped for Anderson IMO, his bowling is not good enough for test level, he wont take wickets often enough as he doent possess great pace, and doesnt seem to swing it much unless the conditions are perfect for him.
Logged
Tommo
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 29


View Profile
« Reply #163 on: December 30, 2015, 09:16:00 PM »

Stokes can and has been already a match winning player for England, he can take 5 for in a burst or score 80 or 90 in a session. Woakes I just can not see doing this at international level. He is a neat and tidy bowler and solid with the bat but doesn't have that extra to change a game in my opinion.
Logged
fatcatstu
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 744


View Profile
« Reply #164 on: December 31, 2015, 12:49:10 PM »

South Africa have called up a man called Hardus Viljoen to their squad for the next test as Abbott is carrying a niggle.

What a fantastically South African name.
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 7 8 9 10 [11] 12 13 14 15 ... 22 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.164 seconds with 21 queries.