Spelling and grammar

[b4matt]

HEY EVERYONE LOOK AT ME......




I just became a full member...... cool...

The sad thing is i'm really chuffed

[ifm]

No offense Dingdell but what a load of pish!
You seem to be over analysing a tad here, basically saying Bolt uses odd wording because he has a small willy, while it may be true it was not the subject matter (well i think not anyway).
My own objections were against people saying things like "use capital letters", "use paragraphs", "insert a few commas and full stops" etc. etc.
People have been "attacked" over these things and it is irrelevent, folks should not be intimidated by the odd person or two with a superiority complex.

[charmaine]

Congratulations Matt .......... Its the little things in life that are more pleasing lol


 

[b4matt]

Thankyou Char...

But i'm no longer little... oh no.... i'm now fullll x

[Dingdell]

I wonder if you retain the ability to see the paradox in writing a thirty five line post on being the centre of attention.

Absolutely I see the paradox! I was aware of it when writing but I wrote it in simple english and with paragraphs so I hope it was fairly understandable, and passed the complicated post test!   

Regarding quoting the 'many studies' I decided it wasn't required (and would be gilding the lilly a little) as this is not a clinical psychology forum and I didn't think that it would interest the majority of readers here, therefore I chose to omit it. I think that quoting the studies, including sorce notes etc would be over egging the pudding and unneccessary - that would be the action of someone definitely looking to impress, which wasn't my aim.

My intention was to inform people of my opinion in a way they would understand which I think I achieved. 

[RED-DOG]

I wonder if you retain the ability to see the paradox in writing a thirty five line post on being the centre of attention.

Absolutely I see the paradox! I was aware of it when writing but I wrote it in simple english and with paragraphs so I hope it was fairly understandable, and passed the complicated post test!   

Regarding quoting the 'many studies' I decided it wasn't required (and would be gilding the lilly a little) as this is not a clinical psychology forum and I didn't think that it would interest the majority of readers here, therefore I chose to omit it. I think that quoting the studies, including sorce notes etc would be over egging the pudding and unneccessary - that would be the action of someone definitely looking to impress, which wasn't my aim.

My intention was to inform people of my opinion in a way they would understand which I think I achieved. 

I love it when you talk dirty

[Dingdell]

You seem to be over analysing a tad here, basically saying Bolt uses odd wording because he has a small willy, while it may be true it was not the subject matter (well i think not anyway).
My own objections were against people saying things like "use capital letters", "use paragraphs", "insert a few commas and full stops" etc. etc.
People have been "attacked" over these things and it is irrelevent, folks should not be intimidated by the odd person or two with a superiority complex.

Well - I have no personal knowledge about his willy - nor do  I want any!

I agree with IFM that people should be allowed to post exactly how they want to - and no one should be intimidated about posting, that's not what this forum is about. I'm merely posting about why I choose not to read difficult to read posts and what I think causes these posts to be made by some people. In no way is this about anyone on this forum unless the cap fits, I have never met or made any psychological evaluations on anyone on this site!  

Ding

[bolt pp]

I wonder if you retain the ability to see the paradox in writing a thirty five line post on being the centre of attention.

Absolutely I see the paradox! I was aware of it when writing but I wrote it in simple english and with paragraphs so I hope it was fairly understandable, and passed the complicated post test!   

Regarding quoting the 'many studies' I decided it wasn't required (and would be gilding the lilly a little) as this is not a clinical psychology forum and I didn't think that it would interest the majority of readers here, therefore I chose to omit it. I think that quoting the studies, including sorce notes etc would be over egging the pudding and unneccessary - that would be the action of someone definitely looking to impress, which wasn't my aim.

My intention was to inform people of my opinion in a way they would understand which I think I achieved. 

Fair enough, but if i really was a person of the aforementioned inclination imagine how badly your post would've made me feel?
And for what? using a few obscure and colourful words.
not very nice, especialy if i was that emotionaly fragile.

[Dingdell]

I wonder if you retain the ability to see the paradox in writing a thirty five line post on being the centre of attention.

Absolutely I see the paradox! I was aware of it when writing but I wrote it in simple english and with paragraphs so I hope it was fairly understandable, and passed the complicated post test!   

Regarding quoting the 'many studies' I decided it wasn't required (and would be gilding the lilly a little) as this is not a clinical psychology forum and I didn't think that it would interest the majority of readers here, therefore I chose to omit it. I think that quoting the studies, including sorce notes etc would be over egging the pudding and unneccessary - that would be the action of someone definitely looking to impress, which wasn't my aim.

My intention was to inform people of my opinion in a way they would understand which I think I achieved. 

I love it when you talk dirty

Egging the pudding....egging the pudding....egging the pudding......now go and lay down in a dark room.

Ding

[bolt pp]

No offense Dingdell but what a load of pish!
You seem to be over analysing a tad here, basically saying Bolt uses odd wording because he has a small willy, while it may be true it was not the subject matter (well i think not anyway).
My own objections were against people saying things like "use capital letters", "use paragraphs", "insert a few commas and full stops" etc. etc.
People have been "attacked" over these things and it is irrelevent, folks should not be intimidated by the odd person or two with a superiority complex.

I have a small willy irrespective of my useage of modern english, ty

[Dingdell]

I wonder if you retain the ability to see the paradox in writing a thirty five line post on being the centre of attention.

Absolutely I see the paradox! I was aware of it when writing but I wrote it in simple english and with paragraphs so I hope it was fairly understandable, and passed the complicated post test!   

Regarding quoting the 'many studies' I decided it wasn't required (and would be gilding the lilly a little) as this is not a clinical psychology forum and I didn't think that it would interest the majority of readers here, therefore I chose to omit it. I think that quoting the studies, including sorce notes etc would be over egging the pudding and unneccessary - that would be the action of someone definitely looking to impress, which wasn't my aim.

My intention was to inform people of my opinion in a way they would understand which I think I achieved. 

Fair enough, but if i really was a person of the aforementioned inclination imagine how badly your post would've made me feel?
And for what? using a few obscure and colourful words.
not very nice, especialy if i was that emotionaly fragile.

I'm not going to have a discussion based on whats and wherefore, imagine this imagine that. I can only work on fact and as stated before my post was to explain why I don't read certain types of posts. I wasn't talking about you in particular, merely posts that are difficult to read due to their content and layout it's irrelevant. If you recognise yourself from the descriptions I have given then that speaks for itself but this post is not about you.

If you recognise yourself from the descriptions of personality types I have given then so be it.

[Dingdell]

End of discsussion from me - don't want to feed anyones ego....

[bolt pp]

End of discsussion from me - don't want to feed anyones ego....

I was using "me" as an example of however the person to whom the post was directed might feel.
I'm also sure that whomever it is your addresing dose'nt know you well enough to give you the credibility of being able to inflate their ego.

[b4matt]

Ding.... giz a smile ...I'll be round i n five minutues with the massage oil get your dressing gown on

 

[Dingdell]

Ding.... giz a smile ...I'll be round i n five minutues with the massage oil get your dressing gown on

 

Blimey - I was excited then dissapointed - I didn't want to keep my dressing gown on........