blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
April 20, 2024, 01:33:33 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2272540 Posts in 66754 Topics by 16946 Members
Latest Member: KobeTaylor
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Community Forums
| |-+  The Lounge
| | |-+  Which PM would have handled COVID19 best?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Down Print
Author Topic: Which PM would have handled COVID19 best?  (Read 3647 times)
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« on: March 21, 2020, 08:45:28 AM »


If we restrict it to the last, say, 55 years, which Prime Minister might have handled this virus crisis, & the subsequent huge economic consequences which will surely follow, best?

Wilson

Heath

Callaghan

Thatcher

Major

Blair

Brown

Cameron

May

Johnson




Think, for me, Thatcher would be head & shoulders above the rest, with Blair maybe second best.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
bookiebasher
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1381



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2020, 08:54:07 AM »

Thatcher .

Had the courage of her own convictions .

Strong and positive .

A leader not a follower .
Logged
Doobs
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 16575


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2020, 09:06:30 AM »

Not having Thatcher.  She was too stubborn, so if she decided early that we weren't going to close everything, that is what we would do until it was too late.

I'd go for Major, Blair, Brown or Cameron ahead of her, and probably ahead of Johnson too. I was too young to have a view of Wilson and Heath.  May and Callaghan nope, though both were unlucky in their timing, as is Johnson.

Can we pick Moon Jae-in?   
Logged

Most of the bets placed so far seem more like hopeful punts rather than value spots
bookiebasher
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1381



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: March 21, 2020, 09:16:52 AM »

Not having Thatcher.  She was too stubborn, so if she decided early that we weren't going to close everything, that is what we would do until it was too late.

I'd go for Major, Blair, Brown or Cameron ahead of her, and probably ahead of Johnson too. I was too young to have a view of Wilson and Heath.  May and Callaghan nope, though both were unlucky in their timing, as is Johnson.

Can we pick Moon Jae-in?  

She would have been the first to close borders and restrict travel to save UK lives.

Can’t imagine for a second she wouldn’t take decisive action to protect the UK.
Logged
Pokerpops
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1423


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: March 21, 2020, 09:31:24 AM »

It can only be Thatcher for me.

Thatcher had a science background and the balls to act on her belief. Sadly, if the outbreak occurred post ‘84 we might have had even more difficulty imposing any lockdown. She was a tad divisive...


Given that she is unavailable now, I’ll take Boris over any of the alternatives. Including Blair.
Logged

"More than at any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly."
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: March 21, 2020, 09:50:45 AM »


I’d be looking for who is the most intelligent. I’d go Brown, Blair, Major, Thatcher, in that order. As I say all
the time , I think intelligence is directly correlated to the ability to change your mind and be flexible, that will be key here. Brown had experience of playing a leading role in response to a global crisis, it seems outside of the U.K. most agree that he was excellent.

The problem with Boris is that for the average person, who is not interested in Coronavirus or politics, if you heard him say something significantly outside of the norm, you would assume (quite reasonably on all evidence) that he was lying or that he was joking. It’s hard to imagine anything less desirable in this spot.
Logged
Woodsey
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15846



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: March 21, 2020, 11:15:07 AM »

Thatcher
Logged
Karabiner
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22737


James Webb Telescope


View Profile
« Reply #7 on: March 21, 2020, 11:20:11 AM »

I must admit that my first thoughts were Thatcher then Blair.

Wilson and Heath were both far too weak imo.
Logged

"Golf is deceptively simple and endlessly complicated. It satisfies the soul and frustrates the intellect. It is at the same time maddening and rewarding and it is without a doubt the greatest game that mankind has ever invented." - Arnold Palmer aka The King.
nirvana
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 7804



View Profile
« Reply #8 on: March 21, 2020, 11:53:45 AM »

Blair and Brown closely followed by Cameron and Boris. Thatcher after these, not sufficient empathy or flexibility in my book and a bit of tough, bit of kindness, and an ability to change views quickly needed in this spot I think.
Logged

sola virtus nobilitat
Pokerpops
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1423


View Profile
« Reply #9 on: March 21, 2020, 12:35:18 PM »


I’d be looking for who is the most intelligent. I’d go Brown, Blair, Major, Thatcher, in that order. As I say all
the time , I think intelligence is directly correlated to the ability to change your mind and be flexible, that will be key here. Brown had experience of playing a leading role in response to a global crisis, it seems outside of the U.K. most agree that he was excellent.

The problem with Boris is that for the average person, who is not interested in Coronavirus or politics, if you heard him say something significantly outside of the norm, you would assume (quite reasonably on all evidence) that he was lying or that he was joking. It’s hard to imagine anything less desirable in this spot.

I kind of disagree with this. Being able to change your mind is only of value if you change from a poor position to a better one.

As for Boris and the ‘average person’, I think you are seriously underestimating their intelligence. Sufficient numbers of them voted for the Conservatives, and by extension him very recently.



Logged

"More than at any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly."
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: March 21, 2020, 01:05:08 PM »


I’d be looking for who is the most intelligent. I’d go Brown, Blair, Major, Thatcher, in that order. As I say all
the time , I think intelligence is directly correlated to the ability to change your mind and be flexible, that will be key here. Brown had experience of playing a leading role in response to a global crisis, it seems outside of the U.K. most agree that he was excellent.

The problem with Boris is that for the average person, who is not interested in Coronavirus or politics, if you heard him say something significantly outside of the norm, you would assume (quite reasonably on all evidence) that he was lying or that he was joking. It’s hard to imagine anything less desirable in this spot.

I kind of disagree with this. Being able to change your mind is only of value if you change from a poor position to a better one.

As for Boris and the ‘average person’, I think you are seriously underestimating their intelligence. Sufficient numbers of them voted for the Conservatives, and by extension him very recently.


The theory is that you change your mind to a greater or lesser extent once more information becomes available, it’s like an iteration to gradually improve quality of thought/level of understanding.

There’s just so much we don’t know about perception of Boris, it won’t be much more than 25% of the population that voted Conservative, plenty of those imo would vote for him because they like the fact that he’s a clown.
Logged
MintTrav
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3401


View Profile
« Reply #11 on: March 22, 2020, 10:32:02 AM »

Hearing Brown being interviewed about this on Thursday morning, it was like he was on a different level of understanding than we have been seeing (as was David Miliband the previous day), so I’d have to go with Brown. After that, I find it hard to chose between Major, Blair and Cameron, but I guess it would be Blair.

Logged
Pokerpops
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1423


View Profile
« Reply #12 on: March 22, 2020, 03:33:01 PM »


I’d be looking for who is the most intelligent. I’d go Brown, Blair, Major, Thatcher, in that order. As I say all
the time , I think intelligence is directly correlated to the ability to change your mind and be flexible, that will be key here. Brown had experience of playing a leading role in response to a global crisis, it seems outside of the U.K. most agree that he was excellent.

The problem with Boris is that for the average person, who is not interested in Coronavirus or politics, if you heard him say something significantly outside of the norm, you would assume (quite reasonably on all evidence) that he was lying or that he was joking. It’s hard to imagine anything less desirable in this spot.

I kind of disagree with this. Being able to change your mind is only of value if you change from a poor position to a better one.

As for Boris and the ‘average person’, I think you are seriously underestimating their intelligence. Sufficient numbers of them voted for the Conservatives, and by extension him very recently.


The theory is that you change your mind to a greater or lesser extent once more information becomes available, it’s like an iteration to gradually improve quality of thought/level of understanding.

There’s just so much we don’t know about perception of Boris, it won’t be much more than 25% of the population that voted Conservative, plenty of those imo would vote for him because they like the fact that he’s a clown.

I understand the iterative process, but I’m going to disagree with your view of intelligence out of sheer bloody mindedness. Or because it makes no sense.

You equate being able to ‘change your mind’ with being ‘intelligent’. They aren’t at all the same, unless, when you say ‘change your mind’ you actually mean ‘learn something new’. Which is a very different kettle of fish.

Logged

"More than at any other time in history, mankind faces a crossroads. One path leads to despair and utter hopelessness. The other, to total extinction. Let us pray we have the wisdom to choose correctly."
EvilPie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 14253



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: March 22, 2020, 03:36:39 PM »

Hearing Brown being interviewed about this on Thursday morning, it was like he was on a different level of understanding than we have been seeing (as was David Miliband the previous day), so I’d have to go with Brown. After that, I find it hard to chose between Major, Blair and Cameron, but I guess it would be Blair.



It's really easy to be interviewed about this when it doesn't matter one jot what you actually say.

Boris has to be so careful, one wrong word and he's screwed.

Brown and Milliband can say wtf they like with literally zero consequence.

Logged

Motivational speeches at their best:

"Because thats what living is, the 6 inches in front of your face......" - Patrick Leonard - 10th May 2015
kukushkin88
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3892



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: March 22, 2020, 03:52:53 PM »


I’d be looking for who is the most intelligent. I’d go Brown, Blair, Major, Thatcher, in that order. As I say all
the time , I think intelligence is directly correlated to the ability to change your mind and be flexible, that will be key here. Brown had experience of playing a leading role in response to a global crisis, it seems outside of the U.K. most agree that he was excellent.

The problem with Boris is that for the average person, who is not interested in Coronavirus or politics, if you heard him say something significantly outside of the norm, you would assume (quite reasonably on all evidence) that he was lying or that he was joking. It’s hard to imagine anything less desirable in this spot.

I kind of disagree with this. Being able to change your mind is only of value if you change from a poor position to a better one.

As for Boris and the ‘average person’, I think you are seriously underestimating their intelligence. Sufficient numbers of them voted for the Conservatives, and by extension him very recently.


The theory is that you change your mind to a greater or lesser extent once more information becomes available, it’s like an iteration to gradually improve quality of thought/level of understanding.

There’s just so much we don’t know about perception of Boris, it won’t be much more than 25% of the population that voted Conservative, plenty of those imo would vote for him because they like the fact that he’s a clown.

I understand the iterative process, but I’m going to disagree with your view of intelligence out of sheer bloody mindedness. Or because it makes no sense.

You equate being able to ‘change your mind’ with being ‘intelligent’. They aren’t at all the same, unless, when you say ‘change your mind’ you actually mean ‘learn something new’. Which is a very different kettle of fish.


This explains it better than I ever could. It‘s a long read but is completely backed rigorous science and well worth reading:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/02/27/why-facts-dont-change-our-minds?fbclid=IwAR0Qz_CsVFebSavTyQJdhTBov8m9kWIvVHtuc6WUlu4eNfcZwkihCh2ipiM
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 3 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.225 seconds with 20 queries.