blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 18, 2025, 06:12:12 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262307 Posts in 66604 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  was I cheating or not ???
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: was I cheating or not ???  (Read 3335 times)
Newmanseye
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6390


I defy you, stars!


View Profile
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2006, 10:37:16 AM »

Who was the accuser newmans?

He was one one of the punters from the riverboat.  What really annoyed me was the accusation of cheating, I took great offence at this especialy from a player not in the hand.


Cheers for the replys guys, glad to see it was not me, I just could not understand how check raising the flush draw was cheating.


thanks again

Billy
Logged

"And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer."

Hans Gruber - Die Hard
BigTomatoes
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1146


play your part


View Profile
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2006, 11:20:15 AM »

 Maybe in a bar in 1960's texas playing 5 stud i could understand this but not in the 21st century in a modern casino its just ridiculous. What you did is part and parcel of poker and if the guy doesnt understand that he is as well sticking to blackjack.
Logged

is it cold in his shadow ?
M3boy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5785



View Profile WWW
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2006, 11:25:34 AM »

This is no different in "over betting" a pot with a HUGE all in when you have the nuts - cos now and again SOMEONE will call as you are not supposed to bet in this way with the nuts.

Sticky Beak he is! 
Logged
lazaroonie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3108


Your a dead man Den Watts !!


View Profile
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2006, 11:31:06 AM »

whats really annoying about it is that it wasnt someone in the hand who was doing the complaining.

the whole object of poker is to get the maximum payoff for a hand. that is where the skill lies.
Logged

The blog of my friend Colchester Kev
http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2006, 11:37:59 AM »

If it was from a player not involved in the hand, then it was from a player still in the tournament.

Perhaps he was playing his own game, trying to put the chip leader newmanseye off his stride by lambasting him till he felt the need to explain his actions.

Didn't work, Billy's the champ 
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1499



View Profile
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2006, 02:19:45 PM »

Nothing wrong here at all m8 except him accusing you of cheating.
Logged
allym
Full Member
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 144



View Profile
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2006, 03:05:10 PM »

Was the accuser half cut?
Just to get the facts right; opponent bets pre-flop with JQ, one caller, was you who had . Correct so far?
Flop comes Q J somthing. 2 Hearts! Hes 1st to act and raises, you mull over the decision and decide 2 reraise all-in with middle pair and the flush draw. Sure enough hes got the Q. On the turn a Heart comes! At this point you get accused of cheating by trying to induce a call! When you tried to induce a call, allegedly, you suspected you were behind and you were right! At this point (after the flop) I think the opponent is the marginal favourite (forgive me if I'm wrong, odds knowledge somewhat suspect)! And you were accused of cheating!
To make matters worse the accuser wasn't even involved in the hand. It's laughable really! He/she was obviously half cut and/or a diddy! You were perfectly correct and you were the one stackin the chips!
Logged
Triple X
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 472


View Profile
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2006, 03:52:47 PM »

The title of this post is "Was I cheating or Not"

ABSOLUTELY NOT - never in a million years

I think it is ballsy and risky play by you on a semi-bluff which we all do. 

He didnt have to call - its not like he had the nuts and as someone said with 9 hearts, 3 jacks, and 3 4's you are both 50-50 to win at this point.

Nice play and if someone played it on me even with the dwell i would say well played and good luck....

Logged
Bazzaboy
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3668



View Profile
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2006, 04:41:16 PM »

I hope you told him where to go.  Honestly some of the crap people come out with is unreal.
Logged
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2006, 06:15:22 PM »


NOT cheating, just playing poker properly.

Checking the nuts on the river when last to speak IS cheating, & I see that often enough. Thats a different kettle of fish entirely.

Check-raising with the nuts? Happy Days!
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Gryffles
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 98


View Profile
« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2006, 06:42:26 PM »

Don't i remember something about barry greenstein getting the hump with Aces trumper over something similar?

Here's what barry said.



"I'm fourth in chips with about $45,000 or so,'' Greenstein begins. "I hadn't been raising that many hands before the flop, and I picked up K-K-J-10, spades and clubs. A couple people limped in and I raised the pot to make it $1,650. Two people called, so the pot was a little over $5,000. I got a good flop: Q-J-6 with two spades, so I had an overpair, straight draw and the second-nut flush draw. I bet $4,500, almost the size of the pot. One guy called, Simon Trumper. Now the pot is a little under $15,000.

"The turn is the ace of clubs, which gives me the nuts and the second-nut flush draw. I don't know if he's flopped a set. He checked to me on the button, and I bet $12,000. He thought for 10 seconds and called. So, at this point, he's supposed to have either the nut-flush draw or some straight draws. He doesn't know I have the absolute nuts, so he might think his straight draws are good. He probably thinks I have a set of aces or queens, unless he somehow has them.

"Whatever his call is, he's probably not getting the right odds. He doesn't know I have the nuts. If he has a spade draw, I have two spades out of the deck. If he has a set, I've got one of the cards. He's probably not getting full odds for his call.

"I'm hoping for a small red card that doesn't pair. But a spade comes off (on the river). Now I'm afraid he's going to bet into me if he has the nut-flush draw. But he checks. Now, my question is, should I turn over the second nuts or should I bet it? It might be right to turn it over. It's a real big pot. At this point there's $39,000 in the pot, and I've only got about $27,000 left. So, I said I'll make a big enough bet so that if he raises, he'd almost have to have the nuts. So, I grabbed some chips and bet $17,500.

"And he went in the tank - this is with less than a half-hour to go in the tournament (for the night) - for way more than five minutes. People are thinking of calling the clock on him. It's the end of the night and people want to play. But he's just sitting there, sitting there, sitting there. I'm being courteous in not calling the clock on him. He's looking at me, he's looking at people. Everyone's waiting for him to act. People want him to do something.

"Finally, after 10 minutes, he says, "OK, I raise.'' My last $8,000 or $9,000. At this point, I'm saying the raise only makes sense if he's got the nuts, because I've represented a strong hand. I thought I was beat, but I looked at what I had left and it wouldn't be much if I fold, and it's going to be a pot of $90,000 or so.''

At this point. Greenstein says he's pretty sure he beaten, but he has a specific reason for not wanting to fold: He wanted to confirm that Trumper would sit there for that long - look, three minutes of indecision at a poker table seems like forever --and waste everyone's time when he was holding the nuts all along and not trying to run a bluff with, say, a lower flush than Greenstein held.

"I said I would hate to condemn someone to be a (naughty word) for taking 10 minutes of everyone's time at the end of the night and somehow be mistaken,'' Greenstein said. "So, I called. Of course he had the nuts.

"That's something that real poker players would never do, because then you get everyone doing stuff like that. It's kind of an accepted thing that you don't cheat, you don't certain things, because if some people do it, then everyone now feels they're forced to combat it by doing the same type of thing. You don't slow-roll because then everyone else slow-rolls.

"But when you play in tournaments, you play with people who really don't have a concept of this. I'm not saying everyone, but a lot of these people. These people should be, frankly, eliminated from the sport, so we would have a cleaner sport. People like this shouldn't be allowed to play. That's how severe it is. These are the same types of people who, when they go to a new table and see it's their big blind, they walk to a different table so they don't have to take the big blind. It's this type of behavior that, frankly, shouldn't be allowed. These people aren't real poker players, is all I can say about it. Very irritating to deal with people like that.

"I got up and left. Everyone at the table looked at me like they knew what a jerk he was. Now, when I talk to people - I'm letting people know this is what this guy does; it's important to get the word out when people do stuff like this - and what I've gotten from people is, 'Everyone knows he's a (naughty word). You just didn't know.' His name is Simon 'Aces' Trumper and apparently he has a website.

"Ten minutes isn't what was necessary. He could've taken 15 seconds to give a hint of doubt to me about whether he did have the nuts. There's poker; I understand it. But there's a certain amount of time that's right and certain amount of time that's wrong. No good players would ever do anything like this.''

But wait. It gets worse.

"Even when he turned his hand over,'' Greenstein said, "he turned over the 8 of spades, and then the ace of spades. He slow-rolled his hand.''

Greenstein was so worked up a day later, poker pro Thor Hansen said, that he marched over the to area where Trumper was playing the in the Pot Limit Omaha event and told him to his face that he should be thrown out.

"I've known Barry 11 years,'' Hansen said, "and I've never seen him like that.''
Logged
colipoo
Jr. Member
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 61


View Profile
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2006, 07:21:37 PM »

there wasa lot of fuss at the time over this but in subsequent days many players present said trumper took nothing like 10 mins. The many views i saw reckoned trumper took no more than 3 mins just enough to get greenstien to pay him off.
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #27 on: March 01, 2006, 02:19:33 PM »

I think Greenstein was more upset as himself than anything else. He knew he would not be raised without the nuts, yet he payed Simon off anyway.

His anger just manifested itself in ill feelings towards ACES.

« Last Edit: March 01, 2006, 08:51:46 PM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
vinni
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2175



View Profile
« Reply #28 on: March 01, 2006, 07:35:32 PM »

no you wasnt cheating ,you just ran into a bad loser.
Logged

i`v become cos`s bitch
Splash
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 670


WonkyJim / Donkeyjim


View Profile WWW
« Reply #29 on: March 01, 2006, 10:10:19 PM »


NOT cheating, just playing poker properly.

Checking the nuts on the river when last to speak IS cheating, & I see that often enough. Thats a different kettle of fish entirely.

Check-raising with the nuts? Happy Days!


Ummm i did this with a st8 flush yesterday... the board paired on the flop and I made my st8 on the turn and caught my flush on the river... I missed that the river made my st8 flsh... that what playing 2k hands a day does sometime.   Sad 
Logged

".....and Buckley ponders how to play Aces to lose the maximum."
Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.195 seconds with 20 queries.