blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 19, 2025, 11:14:45 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262325 Posts in 66605 Topics by 16990 Members
Latest Member: Enut
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  William Hill Grand Prix semi final...Tuesday 10pm
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Down Print
Author Topic: William Hill Grand Prix semi final...Tuesday 10pm  (Read 3750 times)
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #30 on: March 08, 2006, 04:06:02 PM »

Im afraid Lucy falls into the same bad habit that Roy Brindley does when he commentates. it becomes a breakdown of how THEY would have played the hand. Lucys style works well for her and I endless respect for her as a player but her way isnt the only way. That said, the HU play was very poor after the heat got off to such a cracking start.

Looking forward to the final
Logged
AndrewT
Global Moderator
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 15483



View Profile WWW
« Reply #31 on: March 08, 2006, 04:57:27 PM »

Im afraid Lucy falls into the same bad habit that Roy Brindley does when he commentates. it becomes a breakdown of how THEY would have played the hand. Lucys style works well for her and I endless respect for her as a player but her way isnt the only way. That said, the HU play was very poor after the heat got off to such a cracking start.

What other way is there for someone to commentate other than to give their opinions, based on their experience, which is the combined knowledge of how they have played similar hands.

What's the alternative?

"Well, he could raise here, or he could call or fold. Personally I would raise but there are arguments for calling and folding - there's no right answer" - I would tire of hearing this everytime someone got dealt cards other than AA.

Oddly, Roy did give the absolute spot-on answer as to why he was winning the HU battle - Barny didn't try and nick his blinds, whereas he did steal Barny's.
Logged
I KNOW IT
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3229


I'm the one the right ;)


View Profile
« Reply #32 on: March 08, 2006, 05:25:26 PM »

Im afraid Lucy falls into the same bad habit that Roy Brindley does when he commentates. it becomes a breakdown of how THEY would have played the hand. Lucys style works well for her and I endless respect for her as a player but her way isnt the only way. That said, the HU play was very poor after the heat got off to such a cracking start.

What other way is there for someone to commentate other than to give their opinions, based on their experience, which is the combined knowledge of how they have played similar hands.

What's the alternative?

"
/quote]
Thats why i like Howard Lederers style, as he explains the thought process behind plays if they differ from his. This i concede takes great knowledge to be able to do well.
Logged

You have to expect things of yourself before you can do them." "Heart is what separates the good from the great. '
  


"All money is good, just the quantity makes it better"
      My Dad


"Poker Players and Vultures are alike. They both live off the flesh of the weak"
         Tony Bolto
ruthless1
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 731



View Profile
« Reply #33 on: March 08, 2006, 05:56:20 PM »

Jesse may and the Irish fellor Prad..Parkerson!!!!sorry cant spell his name but im sure you know who i mean, are think they do well together, always have me in stitches Cool
Logged
AdamM
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 5980



View Profile
« Reply #34 on: March 09, 2006, 02:11:43 AM »

Jesse may and the Irish fellor Prad..Parkerson!!!!sorry cant spell his name but im sure you know who i mean, are think they do well together, always have me in stitches Cool

definitely the best pairing.

Andrew, for me a commentators job is to a) describe the action as it's happening and, b) give an insight to that players probable reasoning. I hate to hear a constant critique of someones play by someone with a different style and seemingly a belief that their way is the right way.

Logged
Nem
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9494



View Profile
« Reply #35 on: March 09, 2006, 12:02:17 PM »

definitely the best pairing.
Andrew, for me a commentators job is to a) describe the action as it's happening and, b) give an insight to that players probable reasoning. I hate to hear a constant critique of someones play by someone with a different style and seemingly a belief that their way is the right way.


  party

Logged
Pages: 1 2 [3] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.1 seconds with 19 queries.