set over set? hand 2

[doubleup]

dealt to dubbleup [ ]
dubbleup: raises to £6
_skippy_: calls £6
Zlatan70: raises to £18
dubbleup: calls £12
SKIPPY FECKING CALLS, TANK
----- FLOP ----- [ ]

Zlatan70: bets £53
dubbleup: calls £53
_skippy_: raises to £208.38 and is all-in
Zlatan70: is all-in £126.49

Call or fold?

[thetank]

Was this game 3 handed?

I call call call still.

Zlatan could very easily have overpair.
Skippy might have the set, might also have big draw, or simply AQ.

How come skippy got to see the flop without calling Zlatan's raise? 

[doubleup]

I generally agree with your analysis, so I can't see a fold here

The pf raiser has AA KK or QQ so he has me crushed 20% of the time and will catch up another 8.5%.

The allin player has a big draw or a set of

His credible drawing hands are JcTc KcQc AcQc

Overall I win the hand about 24% of the time, so with only 112 to call into a 550 pot it is a call - but with larger stacks or in a tournament, I think this could be a fold.

As a matter of interest what would you do with  instead of bottom set?

[thetank]

SKIPPY FECKING CALLS, TANK

Fair enough, thought it might have been some new wierd cheat mode I might be interested in.

With AA I'd be likely to re-raise Zlatan all-in on a flop like that which contains a few draws.

[doubleup]

Fair enough, thought it might have been some new wierd cheat mode I might be interested in.

I can cut and paste the entire hand history, but to prefer to edit it down to the relevant points.

M y point about AA was not to play it in such a way that you had no decision, but to get you to consider whether you would call when faced by 2 allins.  I could easily fold in a tournament.

[thetank]

Just being pedantic and sarcastic. It's my way, sorry.

[Gryffles]

Hmmm do I spy bad beats posted in the hand analysis section to avoid contributing the 50ps?
^_^

[doubleup]

Hmmm do I spy bad beats posted in the hand analysis section to avoid contributing the 50ps?
^_^

Asked and answered in the other thread -