blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
June 18, 2025, 11:38:34 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2261740 Posts in 66596 Topics by 16984 Members
Latest Member: thomas_1
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  The Rail
| | |-+  A Grey Area
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] 2 Go Down Print
Author Topic: A Grey Area  (Read 3508 times)
snoopy1239
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 33034



View Profile WWW
« on: April 25, 2006, 04:05:16 PM »

If anyone has any comments or thoughts regarding the latest news item, then please leave your feedback here. I'd hate to write something controversial without giving readers the chance to reply.

So, if you agree/disagree with what I have said, or just have some pearls of wisdom to share... then please speak now.

A GREY AREA
« Last Edit: April 25, 2006, 04:07:42 PM by snoopy1239 » Logged
Foxy
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 335



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: April 25, 2006, 04:19:22 PM »

What did mr X have snoppy ? also ive recieved and email via poker heaven with an article you wrote are you working for them now ? police
Logged
snoopy1239
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 33034



View Profile WWW
« Reply #2 on: April 25, 2006, 04:28:56 PM »

What did mr X have snoppy ? also ive recieved and email via poker heaven with an article you wrote are you working for them now ? police


Mr X had Q-9 (queen high).

and that article... lol
Logged
londonpokergirl
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 2421


Team Busty Gang Capt winners BB1 & BB2


View Profile WWW
« Reply #3 on: April 25, 2006, 04:44:19 PM »

Snoops

If for example player C was all in, and players A & B were checking it down with no betting then I would make everybody reveal their hands, mainly because all players need the information with what they were calling with in the first instance

If there was no side pot and players A&B were trying to knock out an opponent however one of them had the stone cold nuts then I would issue a penalty against the person with the nuts

It also should be the dealer who does this, but I know that some dealers either don't know the full rules , not brave enough to take on the person, or by the time they had got the TD they could have already been onto the next hand,  and on the receiving end when I was dealing back in the good old days Wink I once cried because a certain individual thought it was necessary to be horrible to the dealer and not only throw cards at my head but was incredibly rude aswell.
Logged

Cardroom Supervisor at Gala Casino Leeds

Ex- Editor of PokerNews UK/Ireland Magazine
stallyon
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1210



View Profile
« Reply #4 on: April 25, 2006, 05:01:32 PM »

If its checked down to the river then everyone in the pot should show their cards, even if its the dealer that does it. I also get annoyed when a player shows just one card and not the other. I also get very annoyed when a guy with the losing hand shows his hand to a "mate" at his table and then mucks it. Its very hard though to force friends at a table to bet against each other when it is just the 2 of them in the pot. Its also very difficult to stop friends at a table from force betting an outside of the pot. I'd want a ruling in place which says quite simply -

Dont show one: show both, show all
Logged

 
 Click to see full-size image.
dik9
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 3025



View Profile WWW
« Reply #5 on: April 25, 2006, 07:14:29 PM »

OK , here are some of the rules about showdowns

http://www.poker1.com/mcu/rules/b_article11.asp

11.03 just for you Stallyon

11.08 Is what I think people are referring to. Let me just say that these rules are the most in depth I have seen so far, with alternative rules for different parts of the States/World. However this rule as stated goes "against tradition", and is the one rule throughout all the articles, I had problems with. My attitude is that if you have paid to "see" a hand, then this hand must be shown if requested. If someone is constantly calling raises to "see" what they are raising with, then he shouldn't be penalised for asking to see them as often as he calls.

Logged

Cardroom Manager, Genting International Casino, Resorts World Birmingham
Indestructable
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6482



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: April 25, 2006, 07:41:44 PM »

Perhaps they should have a governing body for players that can agree to the rules to be followed. Sure it was mentioned on the telly the other night.  Wink
Logged
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #7 on: April 25, 2006, 07:58:37 PM »

Perhaps they should have a governing body for players that can agree to the rules to be followed. Sure it was mentioned on the telly the other night.  Wink

Don't start, I'm in enough trouble already.....
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
pinnaclepoker
Newbie
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 13


View Profile
« Reply #8 on: April 25, 2006, 07:58:53 PM »

I stand by the old adage that its very bad poker etiquette to ask to see a losing hand.

If the TD thinks there is collusion going on then they should be the only ones with the power to turn over a losing hand.
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #9 on: April 25, 2006, 08:17:23 PM »

Here's how I'd do things.

Option #1 Showdown rule - The DEALER ensures ALL hands that go to showdown are exposed 100% of the time.

Option #2 No Showdown rule - No player may request to see a mucked hand at showdown.
If collusion is suspected, they may call over the TD who may choose to look at the mucked hand. At no time will it be shown to the players.

What do you think? No grey area in either of these.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
jezza777
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1499



View Profile
« Reply #10 on: April 25, 2006, 08:22:18 PM »

If there is to be a showdown then why not just insist that all players show their cards with left of the button showinng first and so on until all hands are exposed . The dealer then awards the pot.
Logged
ifm
If you're not part of the solution, you're a solid or a gas. Jimmy Carr
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 9259



View Profile WWW
« Reply #11 on: April 25, 2006, 08:29:56 PM »

There is no grey area if you read the rules concerning the place at which you are playing, simple innit?
You mention snoppy that hands are mucked online, this is not true as you can see any cards mucked at showdown.
I understand people not wanting to show the bag of spanners they are playing with (there was a bit of a spat between Camel and Rob Sherwood i believe a while back) but as this is the rule it should be obeyed.
The etiquette thing would not come into it if people just showed automatically, common practice then takes over.
Logged

Sometimes you have to suffer a little bit in your youth to motivate yourself to succeed in later life.
Do you think if Bill Gates got laid in high school, do you think there'd be a Microsoft?
Of course not.
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #12 on: April 25, 2006, 08:32:45 PM »

What would happen if, instead of submitting to show your cards, you simply ate them?
« Last Edit: April 25, 2006, 08:37:18 PM by thetank » Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
*****
Online Online

Posts: I am a geek!!



View Profile
« Reply #13 on: April 25, 2006, 08:33:45 PM »

Good point. Rules take precedence over etiquette.
Logged

All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
Dingdell
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 6619



View Profile
« Reply #14 on: April 25, 2006, 09:54:48 PM »

What would happen if, instead of submitting to show your cards, you simply ate them?

Obviously you would run out of cards pretty quickly - especially in a 9 handed table.
Logged
Pages: [1] 2 Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.157 seconds with 19 queries.