|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #75481 on: April 24, 2014, 08:02:01 PM » |
|
Believe me you dont want to see my arse
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #75482 on: April 24, 2014, 08:04:39 PM » |
|
I see our OP has been managing to fill the hours he'd otherwise spend ITT.
I just did a Google image search for "naked man covered in jaffa cakes". If the police ever confiscate this computer I'm toast. 4:15pm - 24 Apr 14
(Taking things outa context ftw)
Talking of the OP, I noticed he upset moneysaving Martin Lewis earlier too. I must admit to a smile at "Tomorrow piers morgan", copying in the man himself. O'Sullivan a bit wonky on his long potting tonight so far. Perry will give him a game tonight if he can get a chance or two.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #75483 on: April 24, 2014, 08:13:35 PM » |
|
Robbo has now hit four centuries to win his match against the fat dancer from Take That. Fair to say he's in form. Perry and Robertson are practice partners (or at least they were a few years ago, so I assume they still are) in Cambridge.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
horseplayer
|
|
« Reply #75484 on: April 24, 2014, 08:27:04 PM » |
|
If anyone was mad/stupid enough to back my Davis "tip" (see what i did there)
it appears to have scraped home
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #75485 on: April 24, 2014, 08:31:07 PM » |
|
Go on then, MLBers.
Yankees pitcher Michael Pineda given a 10 game ban for "pine tar incident"
Discuss.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
tikay
|
|
« Reply #75486 on: April 24, 2014, 08:41:07 PM » |
|
Go on then, MLBers.
Yankees pitcher Michael Pineda given a 10 game ban for "pine tar incident"
Discuss.
Not his first time, either, it seems. Just seems to be a serial cheat.
|
|
|
Logged
|
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link - http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY (copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #75487 on: April 24, 2014, 09:01:23 PM » |
|
Ronnie losing 4-1 now to Perry. Prices on betfair (back/lay):
Ronnie 1.41/1.42 Perry 3.25/4
When does Perry become a favourite, first to 13?
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #75488 on: April 24, 2014, 09:02:35 PM » |
|
6-1 when he is in the balls to go 7-1 up imo
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Tal
|
|
« Reply #75489 on: April 24, 2014, 09:07:05 PM » |
|
6-1 when he is in the balls to go 7-1 up imo
Half a million quid matched on this match and the back/lay on Perry was a point apart a minute ago. Am I right in saying that means all the money is on/against Ronnie? Perry is an unfashionable player but he's much better than he was a few years back and...has just left Ronnie in the balls. Marv. Anyway, my point is I think your line is what the market seems to say, but it looks really harsh to me on Perry. Ronnie's saving grace is they aren't playing to a finish tonight.
|
|
|
Logged
|
"You must take your opponent into a deep, dark forest, where 2+2=5, and the path leading out is only wide enough for one"
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #75490 on: April 24, 2014, 09:10:36 PM » |
|
All the action is always done on the fav in running. If you want to back Perry you just lay Ronnie. If you fancy ronnie you just back Ronnie. The liquidity is always put in the fav side either way and punters make their choice.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
edgascoigne
|
|
« Reply #75491 on: April 24, 2014, 09:17:57 PM » |
|
All the action is always done on the fav in running. If you want to back Perry you just lay Ronnie. If you fancy ronnie you just back Ronnie. The liquidity is always put in the fav side either way and punters make their choice.
If x-matching is turned on it's all the same thing anyway.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Allez!!
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #75492 on: April 24, 2014, 09:19:10 PM » |
|
Yes apart from bf taking a small chunk for themselves when it suits.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
edgascoigne
|
|
« Reply #75493 on: April 24, 2014, 09:20:47 PM » |
|
Yes apart from bf taking a small chunk for themselves when it suits.
Do you know I honestly never knew about that, a tad embarrassing!! How does that come about?
|
|
|
Logged
|
Allez!!
|
|
|
arbboy
|
|
« Reply #75494 on: April 24, 2014, 09:28:47 PM » |
|
For example if you put up a lay at 1.5 for £500 there will obviously be a back for the other guy appear at 3.0 for £250 which is the reciprocal price effectively. Bf cant squeeze anything out of that for themselves because it involves a true inverse. However when there are effectively rounding errors on the reciprocal function they put up the next price available and keep the change for themselves. For example you lay a player at 1.01 for £5000 (£50 liab) then the cross match will put up £50 at 110.0 and if someone lays that 110.0 your £5k at 1.01 gets matched but they keep the additional £450 potential win for themselves. They cant put up 100.0 because its 99/1 and not the true inverse of the 1/100 you are offering laying at 1.01 so they have to go to the next price up which is in ten spot intervals above 100/1 on bf which is 110/1.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|