equity win tie pots won pots tied
Hand 0: 55.843% 54.73% 01.11% 23300 472.50 { KdKs }
Hand 1: 44.157% 43.05% 01.11% 18325 472.50 { TT+, 77, 33-22, AsQs, AsJs, AsTs, As9s, As7s, As3s, As2s, KsQs, KsJs, QsJs, JsTs, 8s7s, 5s4s }
roughly correct? if you put 88 and 99 in I'm 63%.
I think that running ranges like this in this spot is slightly misleading as each possible hand shoved into pokerstove is deemed equally likely whereas I would be thinking he has a big spade draw or pr and fd much more often than many of the other hands such as smaller overpairs.
For instance, how often at the tables do you see a hand like TT just pushing a massive overbet like this into the pot? Probably not too often. Also given that he will re-raise rather than just flat call preflop with KK QQ JJ TT a certain % of the time, this slightly reduces the probablity of these hands being in his range.
Equally i would think smaller fds would turn up far less often than combo fds like 45s or A5s which you are a dog to. Running correct ranges, weighted appropriately, to show your equity, I would guess you are usually the the wrong side of a coin flip against a standard player and I think you would need to know your opponent's habits quite well to call correctly here.
(PS Also I noticed that KJs and KQs are in your opponent's range in the example you ran which seems unlikely as you have the Kx
)