poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
September 28, 2024, 09:21:59 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2274191
Posts in
66765
Topics by
16956
Members
Latest Member:
indianrenters
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
Vs Nick Hicks.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: Vs Nick Hicks. (Read 3686 times)
rfgqqabc
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5483
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #15 on:
October 08, 2013, 03:44:15 PM »
Quote from: SuuPRlim on October 08, 2013, 12:31:57 PM
no reiterate my point, I think raising the flop is significantly better than calling.
Why? Nick has a fairly strong range and a lot of heart. Why not try and realise our equity with the weaker range in the middle? We can't really bluff every if we flat the flop would be one convincing point.
Logged
[21:05:17] Andrew W: you wasted a non spelling mistakepost?
[21:11:08] Patrick Leonard: oll
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10536
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #16 on:
October 09, 2013, 11:50:52 AM »
800 big blinds deep in a limped pot OOP what the hell is he gonna do here without K8/88/44 and even K8 is gonna have a rough time after some pressure, plus we have decent equity vs all those hands. He can't 3bet the NFD and we can take him off that hand and/or hit a Q or a J and he'll be stabbing, imo, reasonably wide here, primarily for protection, prolly just has a naked K a lot. He just gonna cling on the whole way with KT?
also ensures it's very likely to be HU to the turn.
I think its the best way to play the pot, makes you much harder to play and gives you much more chance of winning the pot.
Logged
http://lildaveslife.blogspot.com/
www.thefirmpoker.com
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 584
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #17 on:
October 09, 2013, 02:50:22 PM »
I'm with Dave here for sure.
Logged
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Nit Tendencies
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 584
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #18 on:
October 09, 2013, 02:58:17 PM »
also, I feel like this hand is being thought about in the wrong kind of way post flop.
I don't feel like enough attention is getting paid to how Nick has to perceive the situation. He has led multi way and got 2 callers. He has to assume that one of them has a flush draw a decent % of the time. SO on the river he knows that a large part of his two opponents ranges are going to at least bet, and some of it (the flushes) probably won't fold. He definitely doesn't expect us to fold a flush here, and considering he is the only person who can have a boat, I think we have to fold.
He's just targeting the flush part of your range with the check/raise. You have to fold in my humble opinion.
Logged
Is this some kind of hilarious practical joke?
cambridgealex
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 14879
#lovethegame
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #19 on:
October 09, 2013, 05:53:04 PM »
Agree with Jamie and Dave, think it's a reasonably standard fold, though an annoying one admittedly.
Logged
Poker goals:
[ ] 7 figure score
[X] 8 figure score
WotRTheChances
MinRaiseFTW, WotRTheChances, Quelles_Sont
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1012
#Team_Eureka
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #20 on:
October 09, 2013, 06:23:07 PM »
Quote from: Nit Tendencies on October 09, 2013, 02:58:17 PM
also, I feel like this hand is being thought about in the wrong kind of way post flop.
I don't feel like enough attention is getting paid to how Nick has to perceive the situation. He has led multi way and got 2 callers. He has to assume that one of them has a flush draw a decent % of the time. SO on the river he knows that a large part of his two opponents ranges are going to at least bet, and some of it (the flushes) probably won't fold. He definitely doesn't expect us to fold a flush here, and considering he is the only person who can have a boat, I think we have to fold.
He's just targeting the flush part of your range with the check/raise. You have to fold in my humble opinion.
All of this sounds pretty spot on.
Logged
NoCardDSC
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 382
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #21 on:
October 10, 2013, 08:28:05 AM »
Quote from: Nit Tendencies on October 09, 2013, 02:58:17 PM
also, I feel like this hand is being thought about in the wrong kind of way post flop.
I don't feel like enough attention is getting paid to how Nick has to perceive the situation. He has led multi way and got 2 callers. He has to assume that one of them has a flush draw a decent % of the time. SO on the river he knows that a large part of his two opponents ranges are going to at least bet, and some of it (the flushes) probably won't fold. He definitely doesn't expect us to fold a flush here, and considering he is the only person who can have a boat, I think we have to fold.
He's just targeting the flush part of your range with the check/raise. You have to fold in my humble opinion.
After reading this, I think it is an easier fold than I first thought,
Logged
Rexas
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1963
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #22 on:
October 10, 2013, 03:58:02 PM »
Quote from: Nit Tendencies on October 09, 2013, 02:58:17 PM
also, I feel like this hand is being thought about in the wrong kind of way post flop.
I don't feel like enough attention is getting paid to how Nick has to perceive the situation. He has led multi way and got 2 callers. He has to assume that one of them has a flush draw a decent % of the time. SO on the river he knows that a large part of his two opponents ranges are going to at least bet, and some of it (the flushes) probably won't fold. He definitely doesn't expect us to fold a flush here, and considering he is the only person who can have a boat, I think we have to fold.
He's just targeting the flush part of your range with the check/raise. You have to fold in my humble opinion.
*sigh* lol I ended up flicking it in and getting shown the
, and spending the next orbit understanding why he's a sicko :p
Logged
Quote from: verndog158 on June 29, 2014, 07:49:39 PM
humour is very much encouraged, however theres humour and theres not.
Quote from: cambridgealex on November 04, 2014, 05:40:09 PM
I disrepectfully agree with Matt
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10536
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #23 on:
October 10, 2013, 04:07:43 PM »
very high chance we win this pot if we raise the flop...
Logged
http://lildaveslife.blogspot.com/
www.thefirmpoker.com
FredW
Full Member
Offline
Posts: 213
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #24 on:
October 10, 2013, 04:14:41 PM »
Jam river as a bluff imo
Logged
Redbull
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 1961
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #25 on:
October 10, 2013, 04:30:18 PM »
V good analysis by Jamie, Dan and Dave.
Tough fold for you though considering how ool I was this session. Only sicko thing is amount of wine consumed that evening :-)
Logged
SuuPRlim
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10536
Re: Vs Nick Hicks.
«
Reply #26 on:
October 10, 2013, 05:30:57 PM »
only way to beat nick is to out drink him
Logged
http://lildaveslife.blogspot.com/
www.thefirmpoker.com
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...