blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 06:21:27 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262354 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  Value bet the river?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: 1 [2] Go Down Print
Author Topic: Value bet the river?  (Read 2353 times)
boldie
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22392


Don't make me mad


View Profile WWW
« Reply #15 on: December 15, 2007, 09:00:53 PM »

Well, I think I'm against AQ or a FD. I am betting to extract value. If I bet too much they fold and I win nothing. If they have a big hand, I'm getting re-raised with 2 hearts on the board.

----- RIVER ----- [ three clubs ][]
sayenda: checks
RichEO: checks
----- SHOW DOWN -----
sayenda: shows [ ] (A Pair of Aces, King high)
RichEO: shows [ ] (Three of a kind, Jacks, Ace high)
RichEO collected $117 from Main pot
----- SUMMARY -----
Total pot $120 Main pot $117 Rake $3


Really gald a club didn't come. I was paying that off, and another reason to bet bigger on the turn Wink

That's truly astonishingly awful.It's beyond belief for me how poor you played this hand..surely you should have played it a lot more agressively.You took 50$ of this guy and could have had his stack. The check on the river is too bad to be a good play here and I can not believe people are actually advocating a check here.

I'm with Lloyd and Longy on this..you have lost more money here than you've won. If I was at your table I might actually note you down as playing scared money...
Logged

Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
RichEO
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493



View Profile
« Reply #16 on: December 15, 2007, 11:43:19 PM »


That's truly astonishingly awful.It's beyond belief for me how poor you played this hand..surely you should have played it a lot more agressively.You took 50$ of this guy and could have had his stack. The check on the river is too bad to be a good play here and I can not believe people are actually advocating a check here.

I'm with Lloyd and Longy on this..you have lost more money here than you've won. If I was at your table I might actually note you down as playing scared money...

It's obviously easy in hindsight. Are your comments supposed to be constructive in some way? I think I missed it if so.

So you bet it bigger and win nothing when he folds A10 and AQ? What hands are we hoping he comes along with when he bet bigger, are we just hoping he overcalls with a flush draw?

As played, putting him on a range of hands that he was calling with, how many of those hands actually call a river value bet when the flush has also hit? The hands I can put him on are A10, AQ, AK, A3 or flush draw. It's likely a set of threes or AJ would re-raise. How many of these hands call me on the river? Not many I don't think. Hence, is the check on the river THAT bad?

Now, if we had bet bigger, we can say the FD should have folded and we are commited.

Now, I'm regretting revealing his hand quite so soon. He had the hand that WOULD call a bigger bet on the flop and turn. A lot of players would have raised with his hand on the flop or turn (turn especially). This of course would have made it an easier hand for me.

Logged
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
*
Offline Offline

Posts: 10040


Go Ducks!


View Profile
« Reply #17 on: December 16, 2007, 12:21:34 AM »


That's truly astonishingly awful.It's beyond belief for me how poor you played this hand..surely you should have played it a lot more agressively.You took 50$ of this guy and could have had his stack. The check on the river is too bad to be a good play here and I can not believe people are actually advocating a check here.

I'm with Lloyd and Longy on this..you have lost more money here than you've won. If I was at your table I might actually note you down as playing scared money...

It's obviously easy in hindsight. Are your comments supposed to be constructive in some way? I think I missed it if so.

So you bet it bigger and win nothing when he folds A10 and AQ? What hands are we hoping he comes along with when he bet bigger, are we just hoping he overcalls with a flush draw?

As played, putting him on a range of hands that he was calling with, how many of those hands actually call a river value bet when the flush has also hit? The hands I can put him on are A10, AQ, AK, A3 or flush draw. It's likely a set of threes or AJ would re-raise. How many of these hands call me on the river? Not many I don't think. Hence, is the check on the river THAT bad?

Now, if we had bet bigger, we can say the FD should have folded and we are commited.

Now, I'm regretting revealing his hand quite so soon. He had the hand that WOULD call a bigger bet on the flop and turn. A lot of players would have raised with his hand on the flop or turn (turn especially). This of course would have made it an easier hand for me.



I know this reply is directed at Boldie but i really think you are making some incorrect assumptions generally here.

1. Alot of players call you with aq, a10 on this turn, if what you say is true two things are happening
(a) Your table selection is pretty poor and you are playing with a bunch of nits/good players.
(b) Your image is far too nitty that someone knows you couldn't possibly double barrell this turn without a super strong hand.

2. His range is wider than you think ak,aq,aj,a10,a8,ac xc, 33, hearts, random weird clubs (kj,qj etc).

3. Of this range hearts bet here at least 50% of the time, i actually think its more. As he doesn't bet we can say that hearts is half as likely as it was before but the rest of the range is still about as likely. If we bet half the pot on the river he will be getting 3 to 1 on whatever hand he has and will call with a considerable amount of his range.

If you don't believe me, I would suggest dropping down a level if you don't like the varience of playing aggressive poker. Start making thin value bets on the river (this hand is not a thin value bet imo), you will be shocked by the stuff you get called by. By making thin value bets opponents will open their calling ranges allowing you to bet more hands.
Logged
RichEO
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 1493



View Profile
« Reply #18 on: December 16, 2007, 01:46:11 AM »



It's obviously easy in hindsight. Are your comments supposed to be constructive in some way? I think I missed it if so.

So you bet it bigger and win nothing when he folds A10 and AQ? What hands are we hoping he comes along with when he bet bigger, are we just hoping he overcalls with a flush draw?

As played, putting him on a range of hands that he was calling with, how many of those hands actually call a river value bet when the flush has also hit? The hands I can put him on are A10, AQ, AK, A3 or flush draw. It's likely a set of threes or AJ would re-raise. How many of these hands call me on the river? Not many I don't think. Hence, is the check on the river THAT bad?

Now, if we had bet bigger, we can say the FD should have folded and we are commited.

Now, I'm regretting revealing his hand quite so soon. He had the hand that WOULD call a bigger bet on the flop and turn. A lot of players would have raised with his hand on the flop or turn (turn especially). This of course would have made it an easier hand for me.



I know this reply is directed at Boldie but i really think you are making some incorrect assumptions generally here.

1. Alot of players call you with aq, a10 on this turn, if what you say is true two things are happening
(a) Your table selection is pretty poor and you are playing with a bunch of nits/good players.
(b) Your image is far too nitty that someone knows you couldn't possibly double barrell this turn without a super strong hand.


Yes, I know a lot of players call with A10 and AQ here and that's what I was putting him on TBH. But if I bet bigger (as suggested) do I push most players off these hands?

Quote

2. His range is wider than you think ak,aq,aj,a10,a8,ac xc, 33, hearts, random weird clubs (kj,qj etc).


I figured AJ and 33 would raise back. Random clubs should be out. How did A8 make it to the turn? I do consider my oppo to be tight, he has a Vpip of 18%

Quote

3. Of this range hearts bet here at least 50% of the time, i actually think its more. As he doesn't bet we can say that hearts is half as likely as it was before but the rest of the range is still about as likely. If we bet half the pot on the river he will be getting 3 to 1 on whatever hand he has and will call with a considerable amount of his range.

If you don't believe me, I would suggest dropping down a level if you don't like the varience of playing aggressive poker. Start making thin value bets on the river (this hand is not a thin value bet imo), you will be shocked by the stuff you get called by. By making thin value bets opponents will open their calling ranges allowing you to bet more hands.

I probably knew I should be betting the river. Which is why there was so much doubt as soon as I checked.

Anyway, bet bigger, bet the river. Will see how that goes.
Logged
Smart Money
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 384



View Profile WWW
« Reply #19 on: December 17, 2007, 12:34:51 AM »


----- SHOW DOWN -----
sayenda: shows [ ] (A Pair of Aces, King high)
RichEO: shows [ ] (Three of a kind, Jacks, Ace high)
RichEO collected $117 from Main pot
----- SUMMARY -----
Total pot $120 Main pot $117 Rake $3


Really gald a club didn't come. I was paying that off, and another reason to bet bigger on the turn Wink


You'd have to be a genius to put him on "[something like] AQ. Perhaps AcXc."

Tongue
Logged

Pages: 1 [2] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.159 seconds with 21 queries.