blonde poker forum
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
July 21, 2025, 01:50:29 PM

Login with username, password and session length
Search:     Advanced search
2262351 Posts in 66606 Topics by 16991 Members
Latest Member: nolankerwin
* Home Help Arcade Search Calendar Guidelines Login Register
+  blonde poker forum
|-+  Poker Forums
| |-+  Poker Hand Analysis
| | |-+  HU - Crap Call or Inspired Read?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Print
Author Topic: HU - Crap Call or Inspired Read?  (Read 1405 times)
Junior Senior
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4628



View Profile
« on: June 01, 2006, 01:43:26 PM »

Playing Heads Up ($50 1 on 1 game) and we have been going for about 25 minutes - its already a long game and the chips are just in my favour. - I have been behind alot of the game but am starting to get on top now.  This hand comes up and i am still gob smacked at his call here! (I am playing as thecharge)


My questions are:

Does my bluff suck?  Is this a crap call by him or an inspired read?


PokerStars Game #5117545354: Tournament #25721613, $50.00+$2.50 Hold'em No Limit
- Match Round I, Level III (25/50) - 2006/06/01 - 08:22:02 (ET)
Table '25721613 1' 2-max Seat #2 is the button
Seat 1: tytewad (1175 in chips)
Seat 2: thecharge (1825 in chips)
thecharge: posts small blind 25
tytewad: posts big blind 50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to thecharge [ ]
thecharge: raises 100 to 150
tytewad: calls 100
*** FLOP *** [As Two Clubs]
tytewad: checks
thecharge: bets 150
tytewad: calls 150
*** TURN *** [As Two Clubs] []
tytewad: checks
thecharge: checks
*** RIVER *** [As Two Clubs ] []
tytewad: checks
thecharge: bets 200
tytewad: calls 200
*** SHOW DOWN ***
thecharge: shows [ ] (a pair of Sixes)
tytewad: shows [ ] (a pair of Tens)
tytewad collected 1000 from pot


He check/called me with just a pair of 10's with no spade! - I can't beleive he called without a big spade in his hand! - unreal!..... thoughts.

I won the game btw  Cheesy
Logged
Bongo
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 8824



View Profile
« Reply #1 on: June 01, 2006, 01:55:05 PM »

My initial thought: If you had a spade surely you'd bet the turn?

And he's getting 4:1 on the call.
Logged

Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
SupaMonkey
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 985


Allin!


View Profile
« Reply #2 on: June 01, 2006, 02:08:11 PM »

In your oppo's shoes i would see; your flop bet after my check is meaningless, it's a standard play (actually i would have reraised you, but that's me). I think your turn check is very weak here and therefore i would expect a big bet from you on the end if you actually had the flush. I think there would be enough doubt in my mind to call you with a semi decent hand.
Logged
thetank
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 19278



View Profile
« Reply #3 on: June 01, 2006, 02:19:55 PM »


he's getting 4:1 on the call.


That's the key point for me, I look you up here.
Logged

For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
Royal Flush
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 22690


Booooccccceeeeeee


View Profile
« Reply #4 on: June 01, 2006, 02:43:56 PM »

Insta call for me!
Logged

[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
Junior Senior
Hero Member
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 4628



View Profile
« Reply #5 on: June 01, 2006, 02:58:43 PM »

all good points - thanks!

too weak on the turn and too obvious on the river coupled with too small-a bet.
Logged
Highstack
Sr. Member
****
Offline Offline

Posts: 515



View Profile
« Reply #6 on: June 01, 2006, 03:33:47 PM »

I would have called you too, but then h/u, I would have put a decent bet in on the flop and turn. No free cards. I know its h/u but T is not like A or K where you can perhaps allow some catch up.
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Print 
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.21 | SMF © 2015, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.105 seconds with 19 queries.