|
|
|
|
|
Colchester Kev
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: July 26, 2006, 12:36:14 AM » |
|
STT 2 im down to 112 chips after My JQ fails to hit v mateys 88
Dave, you could be closer to the reason for lack of success than you think ... why are you losing a shit load of chips with JQ ? |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
raab11
|
|
« Reply #3 on: July 26, 2006, 12:37:55 AM » |
|
STT 2 im down to 112 chips after My JQ fails to hit v mateys 88
Dave, you could be closer to the reason for lack of success than you think ... why are you losing a shit load of chips with JQ ? you could be on to something kev gl dave |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"poker is like sex, everyone thinks they are the best but most don't know what they're doing"
Dutch Boyd
|
|
|
|
Scottish Dave
|
|
« Reply #4 on: July 26, 2006, 12:49:14 AM » |
|
STT 2 im down to 112 chips after My JQ fails to hit v mateys 88
Dave, you could be closer to the reason for lack of success than you think ... why are you losing a shit load of chips with JQ ? ahh but i had lost 300 the hand before with A10 v AQ and was down to 700 and tangled with the other short stack with the JQ. im out that tourney in 10th place! ---------------------- STT3 im out of too, when my QK ran into 88 on a Q88 flop! ------------ STT 1 im up to 3000 chips ----------------- STT4 im on 1500 the problem with these STT is the starting stack is only 1000 chips, if you lose the first hand your screwed! |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
| Click to see full-size image. |
 |
|
|
|
Bongo
|
|
« Reply #5 on: July 26, 2006, 12:50:46 AM » |
|
You still lost 588 chips more than you needed to with JQ.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Do you think it's dangerous to have Busby Berkeley dreams?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #8 on: July 26, 2006, 01:01:41 AM » |
|
You still lost 588 chips more than you needed to with JQ.
since he pushed all im i fancied he had a pair lower than JJ therefore it was a race, and i missed! that call is a big loser in the long run |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wardonkey
|
|
« Reply #9 on: July 26, 2006, 01:03:06 AM » |
|
and the short run apparently....
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
EEEEEEEEEE-AAAAAAAAWWWWW
|
|
|
|
Graham C
|
|
« Reply #10 on: July 26, 2006, 01:05:59 AM » |
|
First few levels in these stt's you only need to play premium hands only. No need to get involved with muck like QJ. Happy experimenting, I'm sure you'll find success  |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Woodsey
|
|
« Reply #11 on: July 26, 2006, 01:07:17 AM » |
|
and the short run apparently....
Well just generally...... |
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Newmanseye
|
|
« Reply #12 on: July 26, 2006, 01:07:33 AM » |
|
well its not that its a bad call, if dave had a decent read, he had 2 live cards firstly and he's only 3 -4 % behind, given he is low on chips its an easy race to double up.
Hell it's not like he did it against aces, then that would be a shocking play.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
"And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer."
Hans Gruber - Die Hard
|
|
|
|
Wardonkey
|
|
« Reply #13 on: July 26, 2006, 01:10:53 AM » |
|
You are not going to beat STTs at any level calling for most of you chips with QJ in the first 2 levels.
Silo is right, even A,10 should be dumped in most circumstances.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
EEEEEEEEEE-AAAAAAAAWWWWW
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author