poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 21, 2025, 10:18:05 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262358
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
Poker Hand Analysis
Interesting hand from Amsterdam
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
Author
Topic: Interesting hand from Amsterdam (Read 2627 times)
The Baron
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9558
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #15 on:
November 13, 2006, 11:59:20 PM »
Before reading Kieth's 2nd post my thought was to play this aggressively for a few reasons:
I don't want to play the rest of the hand out of position after I make a pretty obvious check call.
I don't want to call off 4k in chips only to be reraised behind.
I have absolutely no idea what he has and hitting the flush may cost me most of my stack.
If I want to play this hand I really want it heads up. Playing vs two people will most likely mean my draw is worthless.
On reflection I would go with tikay's suggestion on just passing to the 4k bet. I think check-calling is the worst move.
Logged
SupaMonkey
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 985
Allin!
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #16 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:09:41 AM »
I agree with Pab.
Logged
tikay
Administrator
Hero Member
Online
Posts: I am a geek!!
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #17 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:11:22 AM »
Quote from: SupaMonkey on November 14, 2006, 01:09:41 AM
I agree with Pab.
!!
Logged
All details of the 2016 Vegas Staking Adventure can be found via this link -
http://bit.ly/1pdQZDY
(copyright Anthony James Kendall, 2016).
totalise
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2620
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #18 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:16:41 AM »
would everyone check here in this spot?
I'd check here about 0 times out of 100! Much prefer the bet/3-bet allin line then the c/r given this stack/position
Logged
Newmanseye
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6390
I defy you, stars!
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #19 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:23:02 AM »
Quote from: totalise on November 14, 2006, 01:16:41 AM
would everyone check here in this spot?
I'd check here about 0 times out of 100! Much prefer the bet/3-bet allin line then the c/r given this stack/position
Lemme check, you would bet out, check the raise the turn, and if not already, push on the river?
Logged
"And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer."
Hans Gruber - Die Hard
SupaMonkey
Sr. Member
Offline
Posts: 985
Allin!
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #20 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:23:50 AM »
Quote from: tikay on November 14, 2006, 01:11:22 AM
Quote from: SupaMonkey on November 14, 2006, 01:09:41 AM
I agree with Pab.
!!
Pab was reading the thread when i posted that, i thought he was going to post. So much for trying to be clever, eh.
Totalise/Baron, what hands reraise you here if you call.
Also, the raiser doesn't necessarily need to have something here, everyone has demonstrated weakness. He knows you know that, probably saw your reraise as a draw (i.e. resteal with outs) and thought he was miles ahead.
I think his move would have worked if you had only made it 16k or so Keith. Was he quick to go allin.
Logged
totalise
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2620
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #21 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:32:50 AM »
Quote from: Newmanseye on November 14, 2006, 01:23:02 AM
Quote from: totalise on November 14, 2006, 01:16:41 AM
would everyone check here in this spot?
I'd check here about 0 times out of 100! Much prefer the bet/3-bet allin line then the c/r given this stack/position
Lemme check, you would bet out, check the raise the turn, and if not already, push on the river?
maybe, I'd be hoping that someone would put in a raise "to see where they are at" or other such drivel, and then you can put the hammer down and stack off... something like, lead for 3k, they raise to 12k/15k with 35k behind, you slam it in, maybe they fold, maybe they dont. You aren't gonna be in terrible shape either way.
If someone just calls it gets tricky, which is the downside to leading, but if it does get called, then you are seeing the turn for the same price as if you had check/called, it sniffs out the potential snakes in the grass, given your relative position against the field, and it gives you leeway to keep firing if you "smell weakness" or you can sneak in a sexy check/raise on the turn to (hopefully) end it. Or you can check fold.
Thats what goes through my head when I have reasonable draws with 50bb effective stacks in tournies, it may or may not be sensible.
Logged
Newmanseye
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 6390
I defy you, stars!
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #22 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:36:56 AM »
its kind of similar to Mike the mouth's three bullets but with a nifty checkraise.
Logged
"And when Alexander saw the breadth of his domain, he wept, for there were no more worlds to conquer."
Hans Gruber - Die Hard
The Camel
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 17074
Under my tree, being a troll.
Re: Interesting hand from Amsterdam
«
Reply #23 on:
November 14, 2006, 01:57:16 AM »
Quote from: totalise on November 14, 2006, 01:32:50 AM
Quote from: Newmanseye on November 14, 2006, 01:23:02 AM
Quote from: totalise on November 14, 2006, 01:16:41 AM
would everyone check here in this spot?
I'd check here about 0 times out of 100! Much prefer the bet/3-bet allin line then the c/r given this stack/position
Lemme check, you would bet out, check the raise the turn, and if not already, push on the river?
maybe, I'd be hoping that someone would put in a raise "to see where they are at" or other such drivel, and then you can put the hammer down and stack off... something like, lead for 3k, they raise to 12k/15k with 35k behind, you slam it in, maybe they fold, maybe they dont. You aren't gonna be in terrible shape either way.
If someone just calls it gets tricky, which is the downside to leading, but if it does get called, then you are seeing the turn for the same price as if you had check/called, it sniffs out the potential snakes in the grass, given your relative position against the field, and it gives you leeway to keep firing if you "smell weakness" or you can sneak in a sexy check/raise on the turn to (hopefully) end it. Or you can check fold.
Thats what goes through my head when I have reasonable draws with 50bb effective stacks in tournies, it may or may not be sensible.
I did briefly consider leading out. By my image at the table was so strong at this time, I doubt anyone would raise me without the real goods. And then the move in option would lead to a call and I may well be drawing thin.
If I got action, it would almost certainly be call(s) and if a blank arrives on the turn, what do I do then?
The check raise means I may win a nice pot on the flop.
Logged
Congratulations to the 2012 League Champion - Stapleton Atheists
"Keith The Camel, a true champion!" - Brent Horner 30th December 2012
"I dont think you're a wanker Keith" David Nicholson 4th March 2013
Pages:
1
[
2
]
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...