99 vs unknowns...

[MANTIS01]

I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams.

Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!!

Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class.

Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who.

Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum.

I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters.

You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different.

When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though.

Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think. I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e. Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think. What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you

[EvilPie]

Mantis is my hero.

[GreekStein]

I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams.

Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!!

Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class.

Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who.

Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum.

I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters.

You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different.

When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though.

1)Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think.

2)I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e.

3) Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think.

4) What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you

1) Actually I welcome it. You seem to think this because I've critisized your posts. Not without good reason though - a lot just contain complete rubbish. If I genuinely didn't like the discussion or criticism I would have pm'd you and told you to fuck off by now but that's not the case. As someone who dishes it out I fully expect to take it sometimes too.

2) Not in this scenario. If said cheats had mentioned what they were doing to several people and this had got round it doesn't mean it's possible to prove or that it's untrue.

3) A little different when it concerns legal matters. If you don't see that then you are thick.

4) I sure did say that. I'm glad I entertain you, generally you have the opposite effect on me but I'll say exactly the same stuff in person so your last post is just drivel.

5) Evilpie - don't start on your future brother-in-law!

6) Rooks - all in.

[faireycakes]

 

[MANTIS01]

I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams.

Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!!

Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class.

Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who.

Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum.

I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters.

You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different.

When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though.

1)Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think.

2)I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e.

3) Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think.

4) What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you

1) Actually I welcome it. You seem to think this because I've critisized your posts. Not without good reason though - a lot just contain complete rubbish. If I genuinely didn't like the discussion or criticism I would have pm'd you and told you to fuck off by now but that's not the case. As someone who dishes it out I fully expect to take it sometimes too.

2) Not in this scenario. If said cheats had mentioned what they were doing to several people and this had got round it doesn't mean it's possible to prove or that it's untrue.

3) A little different when it concerns legal matters. If you don't see that then you are thick.

4) I sure did say that. I'm glad I entertain you, generally you have the opposite effect on me but I'll say exactly the same stuff in person so your last post is just drivel.

5) Evilpie - don't start on your future brother-in-law!

6) Rooks - all in.

I like to discuss and debate this sort of stuff as well so I hope you don't pm me and tell me to fuck off. It does creep me out a bit when people do that numbered breaking down of posts type response thou, so try and avoid that if you can. You seem to think my angst stems from your criticism of my posts, but that's not it. I'm not even slightly bothered about that buddy. I don't like unprovoked flaming of fellow members because it contributes to the decline in attitude on a forum I enjoy using. I feel the same about the flaming of any member. I don't take this posting stuff as personally as you seem to. Yeah I was entertained pulling your strings about the I say what I think nonsense. I don't get what the special personality skill is. Who wouldn't say what they think? You are simply saying you have the courage of your convictions and mean what you say. Isn't that just normal behaviour for anybody?

Normal behaviour also includes not saying exactly what you think on a phone-in show in case you get into trouble. If you propose that the special skill in yourself is you fearlessly speak out what's on your mind I will debate that you are actually just normal. It seems that this special skill boils down to the fact you wouldn't be afraid to bowl up to me at the poker table and say "Mantis your posts on that Blonde poker are rubbish". Errr, good special skill Greekstein. Fwiw I don't really think my posts are like the works of Shakespeare. I was joking about that. I think they could be like Picasso thou.

[GreekStein]

I remember this kid at school who thought Shakespeare was waffle. He dropped down a year and needed special help to understand how to pass his exams.

Pls don't tell me you're trying to make an analogy between your posts and Shakespeare!!

Btw I always did really well at school, especially in the 'Say what everything thinks, but not many say' class.

Yes, I noticed on that poker show you said you were never afraid to say stuff. Then you spent the whole show saying how people cheat us all at poker but you weren't prepared to say who.

Obviously you didn't listen too carefully, I was told beforehand I wasn't allowed to mention names and then during the show Jesse made sure I kept schtum. I've hardly made it secret on the forum.

I also didn't say they cheat us all. It's just sites like betfair with shite security that the nosebleeds have been targetted by cheaters.

You are right. I didn't listen too carefully. I just thought that it was a good opportunity for somebody who isn't afraid to speak out to speak out. But of course if Jesse said not to that's different.

When you could get sued for something you can't prove (even though many people know the truth) it stops being about being able to speak out as I more or less gave big clues to who they were anyway but more about common sense. Reading mosts of your posts you probably wouldn't know about that though.

1)Dude, for someone who takes pride in this say what you think quality you don't seem to like it if somebody else says what they think.

2)I reckon if many people know a truth then it would be easy to prove that truth, but w/e.

3) Lets get it straight thou, you're not afraid to say what you think...unless somebody tells you not to....or there is a risk of comeback...then you wont say what you think.

4) What you're saying is you're happy to take pot shots at people on a poker forum and insinuate stuff on a poker show. That quality isn't quite so impressive/fearless but it entertains me so gl to you

1) Actually I welcome it. You seem to think this because I've critisized your posts. Not without good reason though - a lot just contain complete rubbish. If I genuinely didn't like the discussion or criticism I would have pm'd you and told you to fuck off by now but that's not the case. As someone who dishes it out I fully expect to take it sometimes too.

2) Not in this scenario. If said cheats had mentioned what they were doing to several people and this had got round it doesn't mean it's possible to prove or that it's untrue.

3) A little different when it concerns legal matters. If you don't see that then you are thick.

4) I sure did say that. I'm glad I entertain you, generally you have the opposite effect on me but I'll say exactly the same stuff in person so your last post is just drivel.

5) Evilpie - don't start on your future brother-in-law!

6) Rooks - all in.

I like to discuss and debate this sort of stuff as well so I hope you don't pm me and tell me to fuck off. It does creep me out a bit when people do that numbered breaking down of posts type response thou, so try and avoid that if you can. You seem to think my angst stems from your criticism of my posts, but that's not it. I'm not even slightly bothered about that buddy. I don't like unprovoked flaming of fellow members because it contributes to the decline in attitude on a forum I enjoy using. I feel the same about the flaming of any member. I don't take this posting stuff as personally as you seem to. Yeah I was entertained pulling your strings about the I say what I think nonsense. I don't get what the special personality skill is. Who wouldn't say what they think? You are simply saying you have the courage of your convictions and mean what you say. Isn't that just normal behaviour for anybody?

Normal behaviour also includes not saying exactly what you think on a phone-in show in case you get into trouble. If you propose that the special skill in yourself is you fearlessly speak out what's on your mind I will debate that you are actually just normal. It seems that this special skill boils down to the fact you wouldn't be afraid to bowl up to me at the poker table and say "Mantis your posts on that Blonde poker are rubbish". Errr, good special skill Greekstein. Fwiw I don't really think my posts are like the works of Shakespeare. I was joking about that. I think they could be like Picasso thou.

zzZ

[boldie]

lol @ this entire thread.