Seat 1: Threeaces (2635 in chips)
Seat 2: John18048 sits out
Seat 3: Whoshot (8771 in chips)
Seat 5: Margy001 (5220 in chips)
Seat 6: Flushy (3485 in chips)
Seat 7: Horsehair (4230 in chips)
Seat 8: Tere05011 (7108 in chips)
Seat 9: Shades23 (8765 in chips)
Seat 10: ezrider (2305 in chips)
Margy001: posts small blind 50
Flushy: posts big blind 100
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to Flushy [

]
Horsehair: calls 100
Tere05011: folds
Shades23: folds
ezrider: folds
Threeaces: folds
John18048: folds
Whoshot: folds
Margy001: calls 50
Flushy: checks
----- FLOP ----- [As

]
Margy001: checks
Flushy: checks
Horsehair: checks
----- TURN ----- [As

][

]
Margy001: bets 100
Flushy: folds
Horsehair: calls 100
----- RIVER ----- [As

][

]
Margy001: bets 300
Horsehair: raises to 1200
Margy001: calls 900
----- SHOW DOWN -----
Horsehair: shows [

Ah] (A Full House, Aces full of Nines)
Margy001: shows [

] (A Full House, Aces full of Fours)
Did he really play this so badly??
To be honest I probably would have played it exactly the same.
You flop the full house with only 1 other ace out there...go allin and everyone will fold...so milk it.
Turn brings a diamond...small bet to make it cheap enough for the flush chaser.
River brings a king..no flush but keep it cheap so he will call with a 9 or K.
Hold onnnn...hes raised...so what has he got...44, 99, KK Ax (presuming hes trapping too) so im up... but A9 AK and im fkd so I would have called too.
Plan B go allin on the flop...matey boy sucks you out with his 9 and u r left with less than 1k.
Can we have some more opinions on this please.
Flushy and Horneris I know are winning players so im curious as to why they think this hand was played so badly.