poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 27, 2025, 05:21:31 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262476
Posts in
66609
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
[
1
]
2
Author
Topic: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world? (Read 2543 times)
JungleCat03
Insidious underminer
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4270
DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
on:
February 02, 2007, 08:34:31 AM »
Gillett set to complete Reds deal
Liverpool have agreed a deal with American tycoon George Gillett and his takeover of the club will be completed early next week, BBC Sport understands.
It is believed that another US ice hockey club owner Tom Hicks is also backing the deal.
Until earlier this week, Dubai International Capital had been expected to buy out the Anfield club for £450m.
But DIC pulled out of talks after Liverpool said they wanted to consider a rival bid from Gillett.
The Gillett offer is understood to be more lucrative for shareholders but chief executive Rick Parry has insisted that money was not the motive for considering an alternative to DIC.
It also includes a commitment to finance a new stadium, thus ruling out the possibility of a ground-share with Everton.
Gillett, who owns the National Hockey League side Montreal Canadiens, has impressed Liverpool with his proposals and the speed at which he completed due diligence - the process of investigation by potential investors - in three days.
The 68-year-old American has also stressed his experience in running successful sporting operations.
However, the Independent has claimed that Gillett's business empire collapsed in 1992, leading to a £33.7m personal bankruptcy.
Hicks owns rival NHL franchise Dallas Stars as well as the Texas Rangers baseball team.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/football/teams/l/liverpool/6323037.stm
Logged
"In darker days Jason Robinson found God. But that was after God found Jason Robinson."
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #1 on:
February 02, 2007, 09:44:19 AM »
I know I would have preffered Sheikh Mohammed to have taken over.
You either get people on board who pay a fair price and have proven to be truly interested in funding top sporting achievements and top operations..or you get someone who pays you a bit more but you have no idea where you are when it comes to the transfer window and their future plans for the club.
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 34178
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #2 on:
February 02, 2007, 11:13:37 AM »
How immature am I ?
I cant stop giggling at
Dic withdrawal
&
Dic pulls out
Logged
Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done
http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/
kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
The Baron
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9558
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #3 on:
February 02, 2007, 02:07:01 PM »
Quote from: boldie on February 02, 2007, 09:44:19 AM
I know I would have preffered Sheikh Mohammed to have taken over.
You either get people on board who pay a fair price and have proven to be truly interested in funding top sporting achievements and top operations..or you get someone who pays you a bit more but you have no idea where you are when it comes to the transfer window and their future plans for the club.
I agree Boldie.
Good news for shareholders, bad news for us generally.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #4 on:
February 06, 2007, 03:03:03 PM »
The new owners have been making all the right noises so far.
Got to look at this in a positive light...
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #5 on:
February 06, 2007, 03:33:32 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on February 06, 2007, 03:03:03 PM
The new owners have been making all the right noises so far.
Got to look at this in a positive light...
With these guys you have to wait and see...With DIC you knew where you were. I also though DIC were willing to pay more...or was I misinformed?
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #6 on:
February 06, 2007, 03:41:51 PM »
Quote from: boldie on February 06, 2007, 03:33:32 PM
Quote from: kinboshi on February 06, 2007, 03:03:03 PM
The new owners have been making all the right noises so far.
Got to look at this in a positive light...
With these guys you have to wait and see...With DIC you knew where you were. I also though DIC were willing to pay more...or was I misinformed?
DIC offered less. There was also talk (unfounded rumours probably) that Moores wasn't happy about DIC's long-term plan, which is why the deal wasn't accepted in the end and he preferred the Gillett offer.
I'
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
NoflopsHomer
Malcontent
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20204
Enchantment? Enchantment!
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #7 on:
February 06, 2007, 03:48:27 PM »
This thread should've been called: Gillett - The best a man can get?
Logged
http://www.justgiving.com/ChrisKPHall
dan
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3055
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #8 on:
February 06, 2007, 04:05:49 PM »
what was good/bad with DICs offer. the reason i ask is that i have heard that they may put a deal together to bid for arsenal.
I didnt really take much notice of all the details.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #9 on:
February 06, 2007, 04:25:51 PM »
Quote from: dan on February 06, 2007, 04:05:49 PM
what was good/bad with DICs offer. the reason i ask is that i have heard that they may put a deal together to bid for arsenal.
I didnt really take much notice of all the details.
Not really known - all speculation and rumour.
Talk that they had a short-term focus and wanted to sell the club on in 7 years or something. Whatever it was, it spooked Moores enough for him to go the deal that he thought was originally second best. Moore, for all his critics, certainly has Liverpool at heart and the reason it's taken so long for Liverpool to secure an investor is because he wanted what was best for the club.
Saying that, whoever DIC invest in will have an investor with potentially bottomless funds. Both the DIC and Gillett deal had positive and negative aspects. Both exciting and scary at the same time. I guess in ideal world it wouldn't have had to happen. But football is BIG money now, and times have changed. I'm sure Arsenal are a very attractive option for investors (second only to Liverpool...
).
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
The Baron
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9558
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #10 on:
February 06, 2007, 06:16:12 PM »
Quote from: dan on February 06, 2007, 04:05:49 PM
what was good/bad with DICs offer. the reason i ask is that i have heard that they may put a deal together to bid for arsenal.
I didnt really take much notice of all the details.
A DIC spokesman has already ruled out a bid for another club as the DIC owners were huge Liverpool fans. This was only last week.
Logged
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #11 on:
February 06, 2007, 06:38:28 PM »
Quote from: The Baron on February 06, 2007, 06:16:12 PM
Quote from: dan on February 06, 2007, 04:05:49 PM
what was good/bad with DICs offer. the reason i ask is that i have heard that they may put a deal together to bid for arsenal.
I didnt really take much notice of all the details.
A DIC spokesman has already ruled out a bid for another club as the DIC owners were huge Liverpool fans. This was only last week.
They also said that they were investing in Liverpool for the long-term, but there are people who'd dispute that.
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
JungleCat03
Insidious underminer
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 4270
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #12 on:
February 06, 2007, 06:54:18 PM »
The Gilette deal has been confirmed.
A spokesman for lliverpool had the following to say...
"The board are confident the gillette deal is a good move for the club. We are
bristle-ing
with contentment at the outcome of the negotiations. We expect this to be a good deal for the club. No more
stubble-ing
towards the title, or close shaves in europe, mach my words."
So, what does everyone think about this!
US pair agree Liverpool takeover
George Gillett and Tom Hicks
Gillett and Hicks will be co-chairmen of Liverpool
American tycoons George Gillett and Tom Hicks have reached an agreement to take over Liverpool.
Hicks and Gillett will be co-chairmen but will leave existing chief executive Rick Parry to run the club.
Liverpool chairman David Moores, who will become an honorary life president, said: "This is a great step forward for its shareholders and its fans."
The pair, who each own NHL ice hockey teams, beat off competition from Dubai International Capital.
Interview: Tom Hicks and George Gillett
Interview: Former Liverpool defender Mark Lawrenson
Their offer is worth £5,000 per share, valuing the club at £174.1m, and along with the club's £44.8m debt it values the club at £218.9m.
But the pair are also believed to have guaranteed to invest over £200m in the club, but they refused to discuss figures.
They confirmed they will make funds available, both for team strengthening and the building of the club's new stadium in Stanley Park and denied they had secured the club on borrowed money.
606: DEBATE
I'm happy with the takeover, although a bit wary, as I guess all fans probably are at first
FG
606: Have your say
"We have purchased the club with no debt on the club," said Gillett. "We believe in the future of the club, the future of the league, the new TV contracts are outstanding and we are proud to be a part of it.
"This is truly the largest sport in the world, the most important sport in the world, and this is the most important club in the most important sport in the world.
"What a privilege we have to be associated with it and we hope that with the good graces of Rick and his team that we will have on-the-pitch success and economic success."
They said the club would consider selling the naming rights to the new stadium.
Gillett added: "If the naming rights are worth one great player a year in transfer spending, we will certainly look at that as a serious option."
But both Gillett and Hicks vowed to safeguard the legacy of the club and leave Parry and manager Rafa Benitez to do their jobs.
George Gillett, Rick Parry and Tom Hicks
Existing chief executive Rick Parry will be left to run the club
A club statement earlier confirmed that a deal had finally been done after a three-year search for new owners.
It said: "Liverpool FC today announced that the board have agreed the terms of an offer for the club from Mr George Gillett and Mr Tom Hicks.
"The board are unanimously recommending that the club's shareholders accept this offer."
Moores was not present at the official announcement, with Parry saying it was probably "the worst day of his life" and the "biggest decision".
But in a statement he said: "This club is my passion and forms a huge part of my life. After much careful consideration, I have agreed to sell my shares to assist in securing the investment needed for the new stadium and for the playing squad.
"I urge all my fellow shareholders to do the same and to support the offer. By doing so, I believe you will be backing the successful future of Liverpool.
"I am also delighted to accept the offer from the Hicks and Gillett families to continue my involvement in the club by becoming honorary life president."
Parry added: "This is great for Liverpool, our supporters and the shareholders - it is the beginning of a new era for the club.
Hicks, who owns the Dallas Stars ice hockey club as well as the Texas Rangers baseball team, joined forces with Gillett to gazump rival bidders DIC last week. "They are bringing to the table tremendous and relevant experience, a passion for sport, real resources and a strong commitment to the traditions of Liverpool.
"We know that George and Tom want a long-term relationship with Liverpool and that they also understand the importance of investing in our success both on and off the field.
"They have made clear their intention to move as quickly as practicable on the financing and construction of our proposed new stadium at Stanley Park and also to support investment in the playing squad."
Both Parry and Gillett said the addition of Hicks last month had been crucial in sealing the deal.
The Hicks family and the Gillett family are extremely excited about continuing the club's legacy and tradition
Joint statement from Hicks and Gillett
But Gillett dismissed reports that said he had planned to groundshare with neighbours Everton, saying that Parry had warned him off such a suggestion at their first meeting.
Gillett, owner of Montreal Canadiens, has impressed Liverpool with his proposals and the speed at which he completed due diligence - the process of investigation by potential investors - in three days.
The 68-year-old American has also stressed his experience in running successful sporting operations.
It is thought to be the first time that two owners of rival sports clubs in one league have combined to purchase a club in another.
Liverpool will become the third Premiership side to come under the control of American owners, following the takeovers of Manchester United and Aston Villa in recent years.
A joint statement from Gillett and Hicks said: "Liverpool is a fantastic club with a remarkable history and a passionate fanbase.
"We fully acknowledge and appreciate the unique heritage and rich history of Liverpool and intend to respect this heritage in the future.
"The Hicks family and the Gillett family are extremely excited about continuing the club's legacy and tradition.
"We are particularly pleased that David Moores and Rick Parry will have a continuing involvement in the club. For us continuity and stability are keys to the future."
Logged
"In darker days Jason Robinson found God. But that was after God found Jason Robinson."
kinboshi
ROMANES EUNT DOMUS
Administrator
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 44239
We go again.
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #13 on:
February 06, 2007, 07:00:17 PM »
The press conference was good - and they made all the right noises. Still a bit uneasy, but also excited at the same time...
Logged
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: DIC withdrawal not the end of the world?
«
Reply #14 on:
February 06, 2007, 09:21:53 PM »
Quote from: kinboshi on February 06, 2007, 07:00:17 PM
The press conference was good - and they made all the right noises. Still a bit uneasy, but also excited at the same time...
I watched it and am happy with it..the only bit that slightly concerned me was the "Gillett added: "If the naming rights are worth one great player a year in transfer spending, we will certainly look at that as a serious option.""
But I get the feeling that a new stadium would have a tough time being called Anfield anyways...it'd just be different and somehow not right. (New Anfield sounds even worse) and if they sign someone like Ronaldhino or Messi with that money I don't think many people will complain for long.
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
Pages:
[
1
]
2
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...