POKER IQ TEST-------really good and worth doing.

[Zebediah]

120
Pocket pairs my lowest scores.
Bet I lost points for refusing to lay down second set lol, just feel in a real game I wouldn't. Negraneu def wouldn't lol.

[Claw75]

lol - I could have scored higher if I had guessed!  I am now revelling in my low score - it means no one will be able to read me!!

[Wardonkey]

123

There is no tiltabilty category.

[sofa----king]

Your Computational Speed score of 90% is exceptionally higher than your average percentile score.This score is better than 99.62% of all persons taking this test.

 
i was quite pleased with my speed .,.,that was about it 129.,.,lol

[SupaMonkey]

121, my speed, blind play and play with big pairs lets me down but my tournament play is better than 98.5% of the people taking the test. Apparently i could be a low-mid stakes pro, but i'm a tournament monkey.

[matt674]

Apparently i could be a low-mid stakes pro, but i'm a tournament monkey.

all the best players are!!

[Canuck]

112

[jakally]

113 - I am officially useless (well average , but in these things they always tell the crap ones they are average to make them feel better).

[Canuck]

113 - I am officially useless (well average , but in these things they always tell the crap ones they are average to make them feel better).

112

lol, thanks

[jakally]

113 - I am officially useless (well average , but in these things they always tell the crap ones they are average to make them feel better).

112

lol, thanks

Sorry Canuck - no offence (.......although if you did score less than me you should be worried!).

When the profile at the end of the test talks about profitability , the thing it doesnt (and probably can't) factor in, is game selection.
For me, this is as important a contributor to profitability as any other factor. (It's the old chestnut about being the 9th best player in the world, but if you only ever play against the top 8 you will lose money).

Therefore, if anyone scores less than 90, please can you PM me your screen name, the sites you play, limits played at, and times you normally play.......................

Jak.

[Canuck]

113 - I am officially useless (well average , but in these things they always tell the crap ones they are average to make them feel better).

112

lol, thanks

Sorry Canuck - no offence (.......although if you did score less than me you should be worried!).

When the profile at the end of the test talks about profitability , the thing it doesnt (and probably can't) factor in, is game selection.
For me, this is as important a contributor to profitability as any other factor. (It's the old chestnut about being the 9th best player in the world, but if you only ever play against the top 8 you will lose money).

Therefore, if anyone scores less than 90, please can you PM me your screen name, the sites you play, limits played at, and times you normally play.......................

Jak.

If you are interested I play 100-200 NL on Stars, maybe you should go play there....not offended honest lol  lol

[lazaroonie]

most interesting statistic was that I scored 32% for logic. I just call it mixing it up a bit.....