smithy69
|
 |
« on: March 29, 2007, 01:01:27 PM » |
|
I finished work late last night, and decided about 6pm to play in the £10 rebuy at rileys snooker club in ipswich.
About 3 hands in this happened - what is the correct decision
A shorty goes all in and 2 bigger stacks call - with obviously the option of playing a side pot. Check check after the flop, and check check after the turn.
The river is then dealt and 1 of the lads who still has chips and can build a sidepot turns over his cards and announces Straight!!!! (he was 1st to act|)
The other guy in the hand mucks his hand.
IT IS ONLY THEN POINTED OUT THAT HE DOESNT HAVE A STRAIGHT!!!!!
The guy who mucked as he was told his opponent had a straight - would have won the hand.
What happens
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thought I had better put a pic of me on here, so you knew what my ugly mug was really like
|
|
|
RED-DOG
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: March 29, 2007, 01:03:37 PM » |
|
The mucked hand is dead.
|
|
|
Logged
|
The older I get, the better I was.
|
|
|
thetank
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: March 29, 2007, 01:04:56 PM » |
|
Mucked is mucked, nothing can be done.
Player with fuffed straight wins side pot, and plays off against the all-in chap for the main pot.
The player who tossed away the winning hand hopefully learns from this.
|
|
|
Logged
|
For super fun to exist, well defined parameters must exist for the super fun to exist within.
|
|
|
dan
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: March 29, 2007, 01:05:15 PM » |
|
the guy who mucked his hand is now out of it and its a showdown between the all in guy and the guy that cant read his hand
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
TightEnd
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: March 29, 2007, 01:07:18 PM » |
|
Has the mucked hand touched other cards? if not, it can be retrieved and is still live.
|
|
|
Logged
|
My eyes are open wide By the way,I made it through the day I watch the world outside By the way, I'm leaving out today
|
|
|
smithy69
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: March 29, 2007, 01:12:15 PM » |
|
when the guy said straight he threw his cards in the middle!!!
Obviously when people pointed out he didnt have a straight he grabbed them back. Shouldnt the player who miss called his hand be penalised
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thought I had better put a pic of me on here, so you knew what my ugly mug was really like
|
|
|
kinboshi
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: March 29, 2007, 01:15:30 PM » |
|
Did he reveal his cards before the end of the betting?
|
|
|
Logged
|
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
|
|
|
smithy69
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: March 29, 2007, 01:16:14 PM » |
|
he called straight when the river was dealt- there was still betting ot be done
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thought I had better put a pic of me on here, so you knew what my ugly mug was really like
|
|
|
portfolio
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: March 29, 2007, 01:17:20 PM » |
|
rileys cant run snooker never mind poker imo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
smithy69
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: March 29, 2007, 01:20:14 PM » |
|
in fairness it is a well run game - no complaints from me
|
|
|
Logged
|
Thought I had better put a pic of me on here, so you knew what my ugly mug was really like
|
|
|
matt674
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: March 29, 2007, 01:24:36 PM » |
|
Monkeys golden rules of poker:
(6)ii - Never trust a poker player
|
|
|
Logged
|
sponsored by Fyffes
|
|
|
Digger
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: March 29, 2007, 01:27:51 PM » |
|
I'm no expert, but would have thought the pot would be won buy the only player that hasn't mucked/revealed hand before the end of the betting round?
|
|
|
Logged
|
'Some people think football is a matter of life and death....I can assure them it's more important than that' - Bill Shankley 'I am the greatest' - Ali
|
|
|
Rod Paradise
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: March 29, 2007, 01:31:16 PM » |
|
I'm no expert, but would have thought the pot would be won buy the only player that hasn't mucked/revealed hand before the end of the betting round?
You're making sense - but the the qusestion arises - what happens to the side pot - as the 2 players involved have managed to in one case reveal the hand while betting is still to take place, or muck?
|
|
|
Logged
|
May the bird of paradise fly up your nose, with a badger on its back.
|
|
|
RED-DOG
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: March 29, 2007, 01:35:02 PM » |
|
I'm no expert, but would have thought the pot would be won buy the only player that hasn't mucked/revealed hand before the end of the betting round?
You're making sense - but the the qusestion arises - what happens to the side pot - as the 2 players involved have managed to in one case reveal the hand while betting is still to take place, or muck? Revealed hand stands, but can't bet, mucked hand is dead.
|
|
|
Logged
|
The older I get, the better I was.
|
|
|
matt674
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: March 29, 2007, 01:37:51 PM » |
|
from my understanding there wasnt a side pot. There was the option of creating one but the player first to speak after the river was dealt turned his cards over before the betting action could commence. However the other person who was involved with potentially building a side pot - instead of saying that his opponent had revealed his cards before betting had taken place instead decided to muck his hand, meaning his hand was dead and he was no longer involved in the pot. This meant that now a showdown occured between the all in short stack and the player who declared "straight" but in fact had nothing. The chips should be given to whoever had the best hand of these two (the non-straight player may still have had the best hand) (monkeys rules of poker - work in jungleville  )
|
|
|
Logged
|
sponsored by Fyffes
|
|
|
|