kinboshi
|
 |
« on: January 24, 2008, 04:08:51 PM » |
|
Anyone else going to be watching them? The ladies has it's attractions: Sharapova v Ivanovic.  Whilst Tsonga (who knocked Murray out in the first round) has proved he's no fluke by battering Nadal to reach the final - where surely he'll be facing Federer?
|
|
|
Logged
|
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
|
|
|
vegaslover
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: January 24, 2008, 04:42:36 PM » |
|
Beating Nadal wasn't particularly unexpected, he is less successful in this tourney than any other. Think if it's Federer he plays he'll make a lot of unforced errors and Federer will pounce on his inconsistency. Saying that Tsonga looks some player and defo one for the future.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
boldie
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: January 24, 2008, 04:51:37 PM » |
|
Future?..After Federer there will be nothing but emptyness..a great gaping abyss completely void of talent and flair.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
|
|
|
Longy
Professional Hotel Locator.
Learning Centre Group
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10040
Go Ducks!
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: January 24, 2008, 05:05:07 PM » |
|
Future?..After Federer there will be nothing but emptyness..a great gaping abyss completely void of talent and flair.
Lol thats a bit strong Boldie, im sure tennis will still move on post federer. Having said that he is the best Tennis player I have ever seen, clearly better than Sampras imo who was quite 1 dimensional compared to Federer.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Bazzaboy
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: January 24, 2008, 05:16:50 PM » |
|
Has there ever been a finer looking quartet to make it to the semi finals of a grand slam than Sharapova, Ivanovic, Jankovic and Hantuchova? We usually have a beast or two in there but this time we had 4 beauties 
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
scotty2hatty
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: January 24, 2008, 07:00:01 PM » |
|
Anyone seen any of the 3 match exhibition series between Federer and Sampras?
I believe Federer said that Sampras would still be able to beat the top 5 players in the world on the American hardcourts.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kinboshi
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: January 25, 2008, 10:30:32 AM » |
|
Federer is getting humped in the semi. He'll need to dig out his best tennis to come back in this one.
|
|
|
Logged
|
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
|
|
|
kinboshi
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: January 25, 2008, 11:21:00 AM » |
|
Three sets. Who'd have funk it?
|
|
|
Logged
|
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
|
|
|
Nem
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: January 25, 2008, 11:59:47 AM » |
|
Gutted.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
CrestOfaWave
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: January 25, 2008, 05:32:05 PM » |
|
wow - you would have got got odds on this final.
Djokovic has been threatening for a while... refreshing to see.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
Horneris
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: January 26, 2008, 05:53:24 AM » |
|
Anyone else going to be watching them? The ladies has it's attractions: Sharapova v Ivanovic.  Whilst Tsonga (who knocked Murray out in the first round) has proved he's no fluke by battering Nadal to reach the final - where surely he'll be facing Federer?nh. imo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
kinboshi
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: January 26, 2008, 09:09:44 AM » |
|
Anyone else going to be watching them? The ladies has it's attractions: Sharapova v Ivanovic.  Whilst Tsonga (who knocked Murray out in the first round) has proved he's no fluke by battering Nadal to reach the final - where surely he'll be facing Federer?nh. imo. It was a question - hence the question mark? I didn't see you post anything before the match, so I guess you were in agreement?
|
|
|
Logged
|
'The meme for blind faith secures its own perpetuation by the simple unconscious expedient of discouraging rational inquiry.'
|
|
|
boldie
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: January 26, 2008, 10:37:06 AM » |
|
Anyone else going to be watching them? The ladies has it's attractions: Sharapova v Ivanovic.  Whilst Tsonga (who knocked Murray out in the first round) has proved he's no fluke by battering Nadal to reach the final - where surely he'll be facing Federer?nh. imo. It was a question - hence the question mark? I didn't see you post anything before the match, so I guess you were in agreement? Don't be silly. He knew all along that Federer never stood a chance and would lose in 3 sets. that's why he backed Federer to lose for all his money.
|
|
|
Logged
|
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
|
|
|
Horneris
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: January 26, 2008, 06:55:44 PM » |
|
Time of bet: 24/01/2008 01:27:21 Event Date Event Selections Odds E/W Terms Result 1 27/01/2008 2008 Australian Open - Mens
(To Win Outright.) Novak Djokovic 7/2 None To Run
Stake: 15.00 Returns: 67.50
lol owned. imo. Saying that, Tsonga is abs electric, so ill probs get re lolowned v soon imo.
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
vegaslover
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: January 26, 2008, 07:29:36 PM » |
|
Easy trade there then!
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|