poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 28, 2025, 12:01:10 AM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262527
Posts in
66609
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Poker Forums
The Rail
Mr Reed & The Barman
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
Author
Topic: Mr Reed & The Barman (Read 2766 times)
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #15 on:
January 28, 2008, 08:42:44 AM »
"I said 20 not that I would check it down". You're talking semantics here Snoops and you know it....you had played the check-it-down game for 50$ a few times already and you only changed the stake to 20. The checkin- it down was implied, wasn't it?
Would you do this in a live-game? If so remind me never to take your word for anything at the poker tabe, if not..then you know it's not right what you did and you would only do it online because you are hiding behind your pc.
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
snoopy1239
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 33034
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #16 on:
January 28, 2008, 01:25:46 PM »
Quote from: boldie on January 28, 2008, 08:42:44 AM
"I said 20 not that I would check it down". You're talking semantics here Snoops and you know it....you had played the check-it-down game for 50$ a few times already and you only changed the stake to 20. The checkin- it down was implied, wasn't it?
Would you do this in a live-game? If so remind me never to take your word for anything at the poker tabe, if not..then you know it's not right what you did and you would only do it online because you are hiding behind your pc.
Boldie. He broke the supposed agreement on a hand prior by folding pre-flop, I have the hand and chat history. He also didn't play his hand when I made it $52 instead of $50. Is that not semantics? If he doesn't keep to an agreement, then why should I owe him anything?
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #17 on:
January 28, 2008, 01:30:21 PM »
I don't see him folding any hands other than when you raised to 52 instead of 50.
anyways it doesn't matter to me..I would be interested though in whether you would do it this way live or not.
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
snoopy1239
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 33034
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #18 on:
January 28, 2008, 01:39:11 PM »
Quote from: boldie on January 28, 2008, 01:30:21 PM
I don't see him folding any hands other than when you raised to 52 instead of 50.
anyways it doesn't matter to me..I would be interested though in whether you would do it this way live or not.
I condensed the chat and cut out some of the crap. If I'd realised Judge Judy was watching I would have published the lot, but to be honest, it was just meant to be a fun post with some bizarre and hopefully, amusing chat. Didn't know I'd be on trial.
Would I do it live? If he'd already done it to me, yes, I'd use chat as a weapon and stick it up him, but please, don't take it out of context, and don't make assumptions unless you are sure of the details. There are a lot worse people than me worthy of your time, I promise you.
«
Last Edit: January 28, 2008, 01:40:53 PM by snoopy1239
»
Logged
boldie
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22392
Don't make me mad
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #19 on:
January 28, 2008, 01:52:21 PM »
yeah..It's a slow day up here in "high road land". Didn't mean to piss you off snoops, didn't realise you'd condensed the chat.
Sorry mate.
Logged
Give a man a gun and he can rob a bank, give a man a bank and he can rob the world.
ariston
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 3762
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #20 on:
January 28, 2008, 01:55:39 PM »
bad beagle tsk
i hear Men the Master is looking for new students and you could fit in well
Logged
ariston
better lucky than good
snoopy1239
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 33034
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #21 on:
January 28, 2008, 01:58:31 PM »
Quote from: boldie on January 28, 2008, 01:52:21 PM
yeah..It's a slow day up here in "high road land". Didn't mean to piss you off snoops, didn't realise you'd condensed the chat.
Sorry mate.
My fault I guess, I shouldn't have said it was condensed earlier.
Actually, hiding behind the pc is true in a sense, because even if he was completely drunk and had done it to me previously (if only pre-flop), then I would not stick it up him so to speak on that last hand. I'd get a beating, whether I was justified or not, and I'm too pretty for that. Well, that's what mumsy says.
Logged
Snatiramas
Loving London
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 2941
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #22 on:
January 28, 2008, 02:45:09 PM »
fight fight fight fight fight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fightfight fight fight fight
IMHO just log the guys name and details and let him go.......don't tap the aquarium............enjoyed the subsequent verbal joust on the thread though
Logged
The most insidious of rules are those that aren't rules at all.
They are the limitations that we invent for ourselves
redsimon
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 8631
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #23 on:
January 28, 2008, 07:15:01 PM »
Why is it called grimming?..did look a bit dodgy snoops...hows the taxman challenge?
Logged
Success has many parents but failure is an orphan
http://www.organdonation.nhs.uk
byronkincaid
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 5024
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #24 on:
January 28, 2008, 07:24:18 PM »
named after grimstarr who agreed to a 5K flip and then folded his garbage hand. then went on 2p2 and basically told everyone to F off
Logged
Rhu
Jr. Member
Offline
Posts: 78
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #25 on:
January 30, 2008, 09:40:46 PM »
He bet 20 and you went all in? That's not the same as folding pre-flop.
I may be wrong but at no point does he do anything like that to you. I think it was out of line if that's true.
Logged
snoopy1239
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 33034
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #26 on:
January 30, 2008, 10:12:19 PM »
Quote from: Rhu on January 30, 2008, 09:40:46 PM
He bet 20 and you went all in? That's not the same as folding pre-flop.
I may be wrong but at no point does he do anything like that to you. I think it was out of line if that's true.
I disagree. I don't think the amount in the pot is relevant.
Logged
Royal Flush
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 22690
Booooccccceeeeeee
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #27 on:
January 31, 2008, 03:27:38 PM »
Pretty low snoops, your word is only worth £10?
Logged
[19:44:40] Oracle: WE'RE ALL GOING ON A SPANISH HOLIDAY! TRIGGS STABLES SHIT!
GreekStein
Hero Member
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 20728
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #28 on:
January 31, 2008, 09:49:18 PM »
i gotta agree that it was pretty out of order, when u made it 52 he probably just folded by mistake or out of sheer drunkenness. its not like he had any fear, and doing it in previous hands with 7 high show that. he kept a gentlemanly agreement and checked it down with u when he flopped the nuts. Imagine if u had flopped top two in that hand and he moves in. are you not calling against this guy?
imo thats just poor form, its a shame he didnt wake up with aces and stack you for the lot! lol
Logged
@GreekStein on twitter.
Retired Policeman, Part time troll.
snoopy1239
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 33034
Re: Mr Reed & The Barman
«
Reply #29 on:
February 01, 2008, 02:17:10 AM »
Quote from: GreekStein on January 31, 2008, 09:49:18 PM
i gotta agree that it was pretty out of order, when u made it 52 he probably just folded by mistake or out of sheer drunkenness. its not like he had any fear, and doing it in previous hands with 7 high show that. he kept a gentlemanly agreement and checked it down with u when he flopped the nuts. Imagine if u had flopped top two in that hand and he moves in. are you not calling against this guy?
imo thats just poor form, its a shame he didnt wake up with aces and stack you for the lot! lol
No, he folded because he didn't want to play the hand, he said, "Not this time, next one" or something similar in the chatbox. As I said earlier, he also folded pre-flop on one hand even though he'd agreed to check it down. Up until that point, I had played by his drunken rules, so I really don't think I owed him anything. If he doesn't play by the rules, then why should I?
«
Last Edit: February 01, 2008, 02:21:00 AM by snoopy1239
»
Logged
Pages:
1
[
2
]
3
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...