poker news
blondepedia
card room
tournament schedule
uk results
galleries
Welcome,
Guest
. Please
login
or
register
.
July 23, 2025, 06:36:40 PM
1 Hour
1 Day
1 Week
1 Month
Forever
Login with username, password and session length
Search:
Advanced search
Order through Amazon and help blonde Poker
2262395
Posts in
66606
Topics by
16991
Members
Latest Member:
nolankerwin
blonde poker forum
Community Forums
Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
omg walthamstow to close
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
« previous
next »
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
Author
Topic: omg walthamstow to close (Read 8286 times)
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #30 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:08:28 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:04:41 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:02:13 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 06:54:50 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 06:49:26 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 06:41:40 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 06:18:49 PM
Quote from: inthebelly on May 16, 2008, 04:46:49 PM
this leaves as far as im aware wimbledon as the only surviving london track
crayford
level?
no level. it being a track and being in London it kinda fits the criteria of a surviving London track
The county of greater London maybe but not london town
Bexley is in the London Borough of Bexley, Walthamstow is in the London Borough of Waltham Forest, both are towns in Greater London
crayford is different than bexley, crayford is kent, it might be in the county of london but it doesnt have a london postcode
Crayford does not have a London postcode as the nearest sorting office is just down the road in Dartford, just across the border into kent. Crayford dog track sits probably 400 metres from this border but is most definitely in London. The Dartford postcodes actually stretch cover quite a large area of what is in fact SE London
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #31 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:11:27 PM »
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:08:28 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:04:41 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:02:13 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 06:54:50 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 06:49:26 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 06:41:40 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 06:18:49 PM
Quote from: inthebelly on May 16, 2008, 04:46:49 PM
this leaves as far as im aware wimbledon as the only surviving london track
crayford
level?
no level. it being a track and being in London it kinda fits the criteria of a surviving London track
The county of greater London maybe but not london town
Bexley is in the London Borough of Bexley, Walthamstow is in the London Borough of Waltham Forest, both are towns in Greater London
crayford is different than bexley, crayford is kent, it might be in the county of london but it doesnt have a london postcode
Crayford does not have a london postcode
as the nearest sorting office is just down the road in Dartford, just across the border into kent. Crayford dog track sits probably 400 metres from this border but is most definitely in London. The Dartford postcodes actually stretch cover quite a large area of what is in fact SE London
Then it's not in London, it's in kent!
do you live in the south east?
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #32 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:14:12 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:11:27 PM
Then it's not in London, it's in kent!
do you live in the south east?
not if it's in London it's not.
I was born and grew up about a mile and a half from the track, I know where it is and it aint in Kent
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #33 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:15:19 PM »
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:14:12 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:11:27 PM
Then it's not in London, it's in kent!
do you live in the south east?
not if it's in London it's not.
I was born and grew up about a mile and a half from the track, I know where it is and it aint in Kent
well we better come up with a third answer then cos it's not london
portsmouth?
Logged
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 34178
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #34 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:35:03 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:15:19 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:14:12 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:11:27 PM
Then it's not in London, it's in kent!
do you live in the south east?
not if it's in London it's not.
I was born and grew up about a mile and a half from the track, I know where it is and it aint in Kent
well we better come up with a third answer then cos it's not london
portsmouth?
Portsmouth is in London ...
Logged
Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done
http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/
kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #35 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:37:33 PM »
Quote from: Colchester Kev on May 16, 2008, 07:35:03 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:15:19 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:14:12 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:11:27 PM
Then it's not in London, it's in kent!
do you live in the south east?
not if it's in London it's not.
I was born and grew up about a mile and a half from the track, I know where it is and it aint in Kent
well we better come up with a third answer then cos it's not london
portsmouth?
Portsmouth is in London ...
It's closer than crayford
Logged
Colchester Kev
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 34178
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #36 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:40:39 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:37:33 PM
Quote from: Colchester Kev on May 16, 2008, 07:35:03 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:15:19 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:14:12 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:11:27 PM
Then it's not in London, it's in kent!
do you live in the south east?
not if it's in London it's not.
I was born and grew up about a mile and a half from the track, I know where it is and it aint in Kent
well we better come up with a third answer then cos it's not london
portsmouth?
Portsmouth is in London ...
It's closer than crayford
it must be, i heard some woman shouting Rickkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkaaaaaaaaaaaaayyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy earlier, Portsmouth is more London than Walford FACT!
Logged
Sleep don't visit, so I choke on sun
And the days blur into one
And the backs of my eyes hum with things I've never done
http://colchesterkev.wordpress.com/
kevshep2010@hotmail.co.uk
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #37 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:47:00 PM »
lolz, gotta love your argument on this one, ignoring the fact that it's physically situated in London and just using the fact that it has a Dartford postcode.
the DA15 postcode stretches as far as parts of Greenwich and I'm pretty sure even you can't claim Greenwich is not in London.
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #38 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:51:03 PM »
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:47:00 PM
lolz, gotta love your argument on this one, ignoring the fact that it's physically situated in London and just using the fact that it has a Dartford postcode.
the DA15 postcode stretches as far as parts of Greenwich and I'm pretty sure even you can't claim Greenwich is not in London.
I'm not using any argument other than it's in Kent because it's in kent because crayford dog track is in kent and it's not in london because it's in kent alright?
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #39 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:51:33 PM »
now dartfords in greenwich yeah?
Logged
Nem
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9494
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #40 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:52:29 PM »
This is extremely sad news.
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #41 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:54:31 PM »
Quote from: Nemesis on May 16, 2008, 07:52:29 PM
This is extremely sad news.
what that Dartfords in greenwich? i know, all these kent bods living in S E London, DONT need that!
Logged
gatso
Ninja Mod
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 16192
Let's go round again
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #42 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:55:05 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:51:03 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:47:00 PM
lolz, gotta love your argument on this one, ignoring the fact that it's physically situated in London and just using the fact that it has a Dartford postcode.
the DA15 postcode stretches as far as parts of Greenwich and I'm pretty sure even you can't claim Greenwich is not in London.
I'm not using any argument other than it's in Kent because it's in kent because crayford dog track is in kent and it's not in london because it's in kent alright?
a brilliant argument, the only thing letting you down is the facts
Logged
If you get to the yeasty clunge you've gone too far
Nem
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 9494
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #43 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:55:52 PM »
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:54:31 PM
Quote from: Nemesis on May 16, 2008, 07:52:29 PM
This is extremely sad news.
what that Dartfords in greenwich? i know, all these kent bods living in S E London, DONT need that!
no that 'stow is closing.
Logged
bolt pp
Hero Member
Offline
Posts: 10906
Re: omg walthamstow to close
«
Reply #44 on:
May 16, 2008, 07:57:15 PM »
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:55:05 PM
Quote from: bolt pp on May 16, 2008, 07:51:03 PM
Quote from: gatso on May 16, 2008, 07:47:00 PM
lolz, gotta love your argument on this one, ignoring the fact that it's physically situated in London and just using the fact that it has a Dartford postcode.
the DA15 postcode stretches as far as parts of Greenwich and I'm pretty sure even you can't claim Greenwich is not in London.
I'm not using any argument other than it's in Kent because it's in kent because crayford dog track is in kent and it's not in london because it's in kent alright?
a brilliant argument, the only thing letting you down is the facts
I dont need facts, look how many times i said it!
Logged
Pages:
1
2
[
3
]
4
« previous
next »
Jump to:
Please select a destination:
-----------------------------
Poker Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Rail
===> past blonde Bashes
===> Best of blonde
=> Diaries and Blogs
=> Live Tournament Updates
=> Live poker
===> Live Tournament Staking
=> Internet Poker
===> Online Tournament Staking
=> Poker Hand Analysis
===> Learning Centre
-----------------------------
Community Forums
-----------------------------
=> The Lounge
=> Betting Tips and Sport Discussion
Loading...